Hosted by gatnerd
This is intended for people interested in the subject of military guns and their ammunition, with emphasis on automatic weapons.
Latest 10:41 by smg762
Latest 6:55 by Jeff (Jefffar)
Latest 5:16 by schnuersi
Latest 1-Dec by EmericD
Latest 1-Dec by Mr. T (MrT4)
Latest 29-Nov by stancrist
Latest 29-Nov by Mr. T (MrT4)
Latest 28-Nov by gatnerd
Latest 28-Nov by gatnerd
Latest 27-Nov by renatohm
Latest 25-Nov by stancrist
Latest 24-Nov by farmplinker2
Latest 23-Nov by schnuersi
Latest 23-Nov by autogun
Latest 23-Nov by gatnerd
Latest 22-Nov by gatnerd
Latest 22-Nov by Mr. T (MrT4)
Latest 17-Nov by gatnerd
Latest 17-Nov by gatnerd
Latest 16-Nov by stancrist
Latest 11-Nov by stancrist
Latest 11-Nov by stancrist
Latest 11-Nov by schnuersi
Latest 11-Nov by smg762
Latest 9-Nov by smg762
Latest 9-Nov by smg762
Latest 9-Aug by farmplinker2
Latest 9-Nov by smg762
Latest 9-Nov by smg762
Latest 9-Nov by smg762
Latest 3-Nov by graylion
17/11/17
Spotted this on instagram. Apparently a new company called True Velocity is working on bringing a new style of Polymer Case ammo to market. Per the instagram chatter, seems like they were originally trying to reduce ammo weight for miniguns in aircraft, no idea if that is actually true.
https://www.instagram.com/p/BbiOYK_hGaC/?hl=en&taken-by=bat.defense
The company is opening up a 60,000 sq ft plant in Texas:
And has a whole bunch of patents:
http://www.freepatentsonline.com/9429407.html
What's interesting is that this ammo seems to use an internal metal base/primer pocket, which from the patents is Metal Injection Molded (MIM). This is substantially different then a normal polymer hybrid case, which uses a cut down standard brass or steel casehead with a polymer body:
The internal metal base should make for a lighter case, but beyond that I don't know. Still seemed like an interesting development. Between Shell Shock cases, these new Polymer hybrid cases, and LSAT, it does seem like lightweight ammo is almost a reality.
19/11/17
It will be interesting to see how this one works out.
Now we want to see Emeric's neckless polymer cases emerging to join in the tussle - they have certain advantages over the others (i.e. designed for use in unmodified existing weapons, but able to use low-drag bullets).
19/11/17
"Now we want to see Emeric's neckless polymer cases emerging to join in the tussle - they have certain advantages over the others (i.e. designed for use in unmodified existing weapons, but able to use low-drag bullets)"
Could you share some more info about the Neckless Cartridges? I recall reading about them here - but completely forgot everything but the name "neckless."
Meanwhile, google image search turns up:
20/11/17
gatnerd said...
Between Shell Shock cases, these new Polymer hybrid cases, and LSAT, it does seem like lightweight ammo is almost a reality.
I dunno. They've been working on polymer hybrid cases for over half a century.
Below: Left, 7.62 NATO from 1959. Right, .221 IMP from 1973. Look familiar? ;^)
.
20/11/17
"I dunno. They've been working on polymer hybrid cases for over half a century.
Below: Left, 7.62 NATO from 1959. Right, .221 IMP from 1973. Look familiar? ;^)"
Yeah, it's still uncertain to be sure. Though the construction of these Velocity cases does look a bit different, with the metal being internal and the polymer overmolding part of the base - possibly reducing the risk of case head separation?
Still, my $0.25 bet (most I'm willing to bet on anything other the Roulette) is on the Shell Shock hybrid AL/Steel cases being the most successful near-term solution.
20/11/17
https://www.google.com/patents/US9587919
However, there are no images as far as my google-fu is about
BTW, what a nice collection of patents, Emeric. I'm impressed
20/11/17
gatnerd said...
Could you share some more info about the Neckless Cartridges?
See page 114+ of this article.
20/11/17
Tell me if I have understood it correctly: in order to maintain compatibility, part of the body of the bullet would act as a neck in the chamber?
If it is the case, then there would be a small gap in the chamber, corresponding to the thickness and volume of cartridge neck, right?
20/11/17
poliorcetes said...
Tell me if I have understood it correctly: in order to maintain compatibility, part of the body of the bullet would act as a neck in the chamber?
If it is the case, then there would be a small gap in the chamber, corresponding to the thickness and volume of cartridge neck, right?
Right.
The bullet is potentially unsupported during a much longer "freebore", so there is a need to mitigate unwanted consequences, but it's not significantly different from a CT round.