This is intended for people interested in the subject of military guns and their ammunition, with emphasis on automatic weapons.
Latest 27-Nov by roguetechie
Latest 27-Nov by gatnerd
Latest 27-Nov by EmericD
Latest 26-Nov by roguetechie
Latest 26-Nov by stancrist
Latest 25-Nov by autogun
Latest 23-Nov by Farmplinker
Latest 23-Nov by Refleks
Latest 22-Nov by stancrist
Latest 17-Nov by PRM2
Latest 17-Nov by TonyDiG
Latest 16-Nov by Mr. T (MrT4)
Latest 16-Nov by gatnerd
Latest 15-Nov by Mr. T (MrT4)
Latest 15-Nov by TarheelYank
Latest 14-Nov by JPeelen
Latest 13-Nov by DavidPawley
Latest 10-Nov by Lorrybaker
Latest 9-Nov by gatnerd
Latest 9-Nov by gatnerd
Latest 7-Nov by Mr. T (MrT4)
Latest 4-Nov by stancrist
Latest 1-Nov by roguetechie
Latest 1-Nov by gatnerd
Latest 28-Oct by autogun
Yes I'm not sure what to make of that.
I vote for your third option. To get the advertised 135gr @ 3000 fps, 6.8TV needs a long barrel.
I seem to recall that the concept for the TV round was that it ran at a lower pressure and used a longer barrel, hence the RM277 being a bullpup.
if you guys could design the perfect ACR for hit probability, what would it be like
Thanks. I had intended to say something to that effect, but it slipped my mind.
A follow-up note: Although the barrel looks unusually long in the pic that gatnerd posted, it may only be 20 inches, like the MARS-H 6.5 DMR
Simply going from FAL to AUG proved a solid boost in firepower and hit probability for the Austrians, and was ready by 1977.
How did the 5.56 MG-42 work for Spain? I have read not well.
I personally think they should have tried something else new rather then the jump from G3 to G11.
They actually did try something else. They went from G3 to G36.
Would depends on the context, but the goal of the ACR program was to "double" the hit probability versus the M16, and you can "double" Ph only if it's already below 50%.
For really increasing hit probability above 300 m, a FN FAL chambered for the .243 Winchester and using a 105 gr VLD bullet would have been a great improvement.
How did the 5.56 MG-42 work for Spain? I have read not well
I had read mixed reports.
Certainly looks pretty awesome and controllable in this video:
WAY more controllable than the M249 SAW.Recoil in almost non-existent.Extremely portable - I'm carrying the weapon, with an 80 rd belt of 5.56x45 mm.My AR-15...
Given the G11's 1967-1990 design timeline, vs the 1974-1981 design timeline for the Ameli, theres every reason to expect Germany could have produced a highly reliable 'Micro42' in less time then the G11.
They actually did try something else. They went from G3 to G36
Well, the G36 was done after the G11 was canceled/failed. And it was only adopted in the mid 1990's, after the Cold War had ended.
Had the Cold War gone hot (say in 1984), the moonshot delays of the G11 program would have resulted in the W. Germans fighting hordes of AK74 weilding Red's with G3 battle rifles.