Hosted by gatnerd
This is intended for people interested in the subject of military guns and their ammunition, with emphasis on automatic weapons.
Latest 13:20 by schnuersi
Latest 13:12 by stancrist
Latest 12:27 by stancrist
Latest 27-May by gatnerd
Latest 27-May by gatnerd
Latest 27-May by autogun
Latest 26-May by roguetechie
Latest 26-May by schnuersi
Latest 21-May by nincomp
Latest 21-May by Barnowlgreen
Latest 20-May by Apsyda
Latest 20-May by Farmplinker
Latest 20-May by ramosausust
Latest 20-May by Mr. T (MrT4)
Latest 19-May by schnuersi
Latest 14-May by Farmplinker
Latest 14-May by autogun
Latest 13-May by Petrus_Optim
Latest 13-May by Mr. T (MrT4)
Latest 12-May by graylion
Latest 12-May by gatnerd
Latest 9-May by DavidPawley
Latest 9-May by taschoene
Latest 9-May by gatnerd
Latest 29-Apr by mpopenker
28-Jan
Both rounds have about 600ft lbs from a 16 inch barrel.
given slow propellants and a 24 inch barrel, they will stretch to 750lbs or so.
28-Jan
28-Jan
If the Marines go in on the "Infantryman MOS", you're going to find the same people get issued the same weapons, despite what doctrine says.
28-Jan
NGSW-FC article by Popular Mechanics. Archived to bypass paywall:
This stood out to me; we may see the M4A1 also fitted with the NGSW-FC.
The Army has stated it will only procure about 100,000 of the new rifles and automatic rifles, but the new NGSW-FC contract is for up to 250,000 optics, meaning the Army will now buy more new rifles or will backfit the optic to the M4A1.
28-Jan
Thank you for the article. That's exactly my forecast about this program: A degree of retrofit implementation of its new technologies with a more cautious approach towards the ultimate goal of fully replacing the current crop.
28-Jan
Maybe the chamber alignment problem precluded Textron's adoption. Who knows
I really would like to know how was possible to offer such a defective proposal after more than 20 years of testing.
28-Jan
I really would like to see confirmation from either Textron or the Army that Textron is no longer in the competition.
I found nothing to that effect on Textron's news page, or on the CT weapons page. CT Weapons | Textron Systems
28-Jan
The Army has stated it will only procure about 100,000 of the new rifles and automatic rifles, but the new NGSW-FC contract is for up to 250,000 optics, meaning the Army will now buy more new rifles or will backfit the optic to the M4A1.
Hmm. Does "up to" 250,000 optics mean that exact number definitely will be purchased, or does it mean that the buyer has the option to purchase any quantity from 1-250,000 at the contract price?
28-Jan
poliorcetes said:I really would like to know how was possible to offer such a defective proposal after more than 20 years of testing
The G11 provides an excellent example. The technology was extremely promising, resulting in continued funding for 30 years, even though after 30 years it still didnt work.
The US SPIW/ACR efforts with Flechettes offers a similar example. US worked with flechettes and or hyperburst flechettes from 60's to 90's, because the technology looked really promising...ACR trials showed they didnt work either. In fact, the leader of that flechette effort - AAI - went on to be absorbed by Textron and head up the LSAT/NGSW program...
28-Jan
stancrist said:the option to purchase any quantity from 1-250,000 at the contract price?
I think its the option. But its interesting that they are considering that option; it implies they are considering either buying more then 100k NGSW's or retrofitting M4's with FC's. Either of which is worth note.