Hosted by gatnerd
This is intended for people interested in the subject of military guns and their ammunition, with emphasis on automatic weapons.
Latest 25-Jun by Murpat
Latest 25-Jun by graylion
Latest 25-Jun by Mr. T (MrT4)
Latest 22-Jun by roguetechie
Latest 22-Jun by graylion
Latest 19-Jun by stancrist
Latest 18-Jun by roguetechie
Latest 17-Jun by roguetechie
Latest 17-Jun by roguetechie
Latest 15-Jun by roguetechie
Latest 12-Jun by 17thfabn
Latest 11-Jun by autogun
Latest 10-Jun by stancrist
Latest 8-Jun by autogun
Latest 1-Jun by schnuersi
Latest 31-May by gatnerd
Latest 30-May by stancrist
Latest 27-May by gatnerd
Latest 27-May by autogun
Latest 26-May by roguetechie
Latest 26-May by schnuersi
20-Apr
stancrist said:Hmm. That picture makes me wonder -- if this were 500 BC, would schnuersi be arguing that infantry soldiers should not carry a sword as a secondary weapon?
No I would not...
but I would argue about the optimum size of the sword and length of the spear/pike. And the ratio of line breakers to pikemen.
:)
20-Apr
roguetechie said:Especially if you went down to a 10.5-12.5 inch barrel.
And what advantage would such a short barreled rifle offer over a PDW with similar barrel length but an even more compact design?
I think there is a point of dimishing returns.
The idea behind a rifle is accurate fire at ranges in the 300-500 m bracket. For this a certain size and power is needed. Shrinking a rifle down so it doesn't deliver this anymore really puts the concept of a rifle in question.
20-Apr
stancrist said:Why? Seems somewhat redundant. Also, 84mm HE > 40mm HE.
Because 84 mm are awefully large and heavy. The firing signature is excessive. Such power is not allways needed.
40 mm needs smaller weapons and a larger number can be carried. There are several scenarios in which launching salvos of 40 mm will be more effective than a single 84 mm.
IF a HE based squad structure would become reality IMHO it makes much sense to actually develope optimised weapons for this. Not to rely on legacy designs originally intended for a different purpose.
20-Apr
renatohm said:People have been suggesting just this - more HE, less KE - for some time now.
It also has been more or less a reality in the past.
While most soldiers carried rifles in the past their contribution to a firefight often was rather low. The decicive weapons have been the MG and the HE lobbers. Regardless if in the form of rifle grenades, grenade launchers or light mortars.
During WW2 the main weapons of the German infantry have been the MG, the rifle grenade, the mortar and the light infantry gun. Rifleman/SMgunners only really contributed in close combat situations. In most cases they only provided aditional eyes, ammo carrying capacity and replacement gunners/crews.
20-Apr
Just out of interest..... Is the 8.6 blackout a pistol (smg) or rifle caliber?
20-Apr
manimal87 said:Just out of interest..... Is the 8.6 blackout a pistol (smg) or rifle caliber?
Rifle