Hosted by gatnerd
This is intended for people interested in the subject of military guns and their ammunition, with emphasis on automatic weapons.
Latest 13:23 by Mr. T (MrT4)
Latest 23-Nov by Refleks
Latest 5:41 by DavidPawley
Latest 5:09 by schnuersi
Latest 30-Jan by gatnerd
Latest 30-Jan by Guardsman26
Latest 30-Jan by Farmplinker
Latest 30-Jan by Farmplinker
Latest 29-Jan by graylion
Latest 27-Jan by gatnerd
Latest 27-Jan by stancrist
Latest 27-Jan by Farmplinker
Latest 26-Jan by gatnerd
Latest 26-Jan by graylion
Latest 26-Jan by autogun
Latest 25-Jan by schnuersi
Latest 24-Jan by ZailC
Latest 24-Jan by stancrist
Latest 24-Jan by renatohm
Latest 23-Jan by Apsyda
Latest 21-Jan by graylion
Latest 21-Jan by Farmplinker
Latest 20-Jan by Mr. T (MrT4)
Latest 18-Jan by nincomp
Latest 17-Jan by gatnerd
Latest 15-Jan by gatnerd
Latest 14-Jan by roguetechie
Latest 14-Jan by Refleks
Latest 13-Jan by EmericD
Latest 12-Jan by APFSDST
Latest 12-Jan by APFSDST
Latest 11-Jan by RovingPedant
Latest 8-Jan by wiggy556
Latest 7-Jan by roguetechie
Latest 6-Jan by roguetechie
Latest 6-Jan by autogun
Latest 5-Jan by autogun
Latest 3-Jan by stancrist
Latest 3-Jan by Mr. T (MrT4)
26-Oct
I think time fuse airburst would have been better for ground to ground anti personnel use.
The proximity was likely deemed the better choice for drones, which are small and may be difficult the laze accurately, and which may accelerate in unpredictable ways that could thwart time fuses.
Proximity would probably also be better for air to ground work by the Apache as well.
26-Oct
Refleks said:Yes I seem to recall the prox ammo being 30x173, they fired 30x113 against metal containers and they looked like HEDP
They did fire 30x113 prox ammo at quadcopters, so it's not impossible that the airbursts in question were 30x113 XM1211.
Hmm. It just occurred to me that the airbursts in question happened a few feet from the embankment behind the trench.
Is it possible (or probable?) for the proximity fuze to have sensed the dirt embankment, thereby initiating those airbursts?
8-Nov
More info, there are 2x types of airburst 30x113 being developed.
https://ndiastorage.blob.core.usgovcloudapi.net/ndia/2022/future/Tues_GM_PMMAS_Santamaria.pdf
Also development for x113 and x173mm airburst is prompting more development in fusing:
10-Nov
M789 HEDP was modified to include a percussion primer and self-destruct fuze feature to provide dual-purpose capability while reducing the threat of collateral damage and unexploded ordnance. XM1198 HEDP-SD provides hit-to-kill UAS capability while maintaining armor defeat, and XM1211 HEP provides proximity airburst against drones and personnel.
XM1198 was developed, tested and approved for an urgent materiel release to support an initial 2021 fielding. XM1211 has a single mode proximity fuze & is undergoing validation for UMR to field this year.
XM1223 is the developmental replacement for XM1198 & XM1211. It has a multimode proximity fuze with proximity airburst, gated proximity and point detonating functions to allow one round to be effective against uas, infantry in defilade, and vehicles. This matters because the LW30/M230/XM914E1 is a single feed chaingun. Swapping ammo natures is not possible on the fly.
source: https://asc.army.mil/web/news-incremental-advances/
Edit: there may be 3 30x113B proximity fuzed rounds - XM1206 HEDP-AB is in EMD this year for PM Apache and FMS. There are 2 30x173 AB rounds, MK310 programmable fuzed airburst was fielded via UMR in 2021, XM1182 HEAB-T is due for milestone C in 2023. The source is unclear whether these AB rounds are prox fuzed or time fuzed.
https://asc.army.mil/web/portfolio-item/ammunition-medium-caliber/
20x102 MP rounds are to be developed for FVL (FARA is still part of FVL portfolio) in 2023. Currently USArmy only has 1 fielded 20mm nature, M940 MPT-SD, presumably the development will involve removing the SD feature for a2g use and, perhaps, further aeroballistic optimisation.
https://www.gd-ots.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/20mm-M940-MPT-SD-2021.pdf
10-Nov
DavidPawley said:XM1223 is the developmental replacement for XM1198 & XM1211. It has a multimode proximity fuze with proximity airburst, gated proximity and point detonating functions to allow one round to be effective against uas, infantry in defilade, and vehicles.
Great info. So the XM1223 is really the ideal load then, and has the hoped for gated prox for ground to ground use.
Previously there had been concern about the frag effect of x113, and work to improve its lethality, possibly by introducing a fragmentation liner inside the shell. Or ideally creating a PFF design.
I wonder whether the XM1223 will also feature some frag optimization? That would be good not just for anti personel, but also help increase the chance of incapacitating drones.
10-Nov
Tony really called it in his article on the subject years ago suggesting the 30x113 could be the sweet spot for light armored vehicle and APC armament.
https://www.quarryhs.co.uk/CANNON2.pdf
10-Nov
The FVL ammunition is PGU28A/B. I guess the development is to qualify and type classify it for Army service.
10-Nov
DavidPawley said:The FVL ammunition is PGU28A/B
I'm still really surprised they are going with 20mm, especially in light of these new high performance 30x113 rounds.
10-Nov
gatnerd said:I'm still really surprised they are going with 20mm, especially in light of these new high performance 30x113 rounds.
For air-to-air and air-to-ground applications, the high MV of the 20 mm provides better hit probability.
10-Nov
Do helicopters get in much air to air fighting?
For air to ground, does the increased hit probability of the higher velocity 20mm overcome the greater lethal radius + airburst of the 30mm?
In terms of air to air, one of the things I've thought about since the iranian drones started showing up in Ukraine is that a Apache/other helicopter with airburst 30mm would actually make for a pretty decent mobile air defense against drones.