Hosted by gatnerd
This is intended for people interested in the subject of military guns and their ammunition, with emphasis on automatic weapons.
Latest 6-Dec by Mr. T (MrT4)
Latest 15:41 by poliorcetes
Latest 14:00 by roguetechie
Latest 13:35 by Mr. T (MrT4)
Latest 10:28 by graylion
Latest 5:32 by poliorcetes
Latest 1:18 by gatnerd
Latest 2-Feb by roguetechie
Latest 1-Feb by roguetechie
Latest 1-Feb by gatnerd
Latest 1-Feb by autogun
Latest 31-Jan by DavidPawley
Latest 30-Jan by gatnerd
Latest 30-Jan by Guardsman26
Latest 30-Jan by Farmplinker
Latest 30-Jan by Farmplinker
Latest 27-Jan by stancrist
Latest 27-Jan by Farmplinker
Latest 26-Jan by gatnerd
Latest 26-Jan by autogun
Latest 25-Jan by schnuersi
Latest 24-Jan by ZailC
Latest 24-Jan by stancrist
Latest 24-Jan by renatohm
Latest 23-Jan by Apsyda
Latest 21-Jan by graylion
Latest 21-Jan by Farmplinker
Latest 20-Jan by Mr. T (MrT4)
Latest 18-Jan by nincomp
Latest 17-Jan by gatnerd
Latest 14-Jan by roguetechie
Latest 14-Jan by Refleks
Latest 13-Jan by EmericD
Latest 12-Jan by APFSDST
Latest 12-Jan by APFSDST
Latest 11-Jan by RovingPedant
Latest 8-Jan by wiggy556
Latest 7-Jan by roguetechie
Latest 6-Jan by roguetechie
Latest 6-Jan by autogun
Latest 3-Jan by stancrist
4-Dec
A very scary bit of kit was shown on SSD awhile back.
Its a Optic Detector, which is some type of system that allows a vehicles Remote Weapon System (RWS) to detect when an optic is pointed at the vehicle. Not just a laser, but optics - cameras, rifle scopes, binoculars, etc.
https://soldiersystems.net/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/tpl-poster-1366x2048.jpg
Anyone have an idea of how practical such a system would be in reality? And how it's able to detect essentially a piece of glass being aimed at it?
Curious whether I should be spending more time using iron sights for when the killer robots arrive.
5-Dec
Lens reflection, I would guess. Wonder if a KillFlash cover would render the system ineffective.
5-Dec
gatnerd said:Anyone have an idea of how practical such a system would be in reality? And how it's able to detect essentially a piece of glass being aimed at it?
A probably "similar" system was developped in France ~25 years ago, using a dual-power laser.
Low power was used to "scan" the area, detecting optics targeting your position, using lens surface reflexion ("cat's eye effect"), and once a scope was detected, you just needed to switch the laser to "high power" to burn the retina of the guy observing you with that scope.
This system saw limited operational use before the 1998 ban of blinding laser weapons.
A "kill flash" on the scope reduces the detection capability of such system, but also reduces the scope light transmission capability.
5-Dec
From what i know lens finding systems were first developed for finding submarine periscopes. And systems these days are precise enough to where they are filtering reflection from scopes, and other reflections, weeding out false returns. Its not considered an object of interest if there are not at least 2 lenses detected in the device. Kill flash doesn't hide the lens just greatly reduces the angle at which the detector can find it. But more than sniper scopes on the battlefield these things are useful for finding ATGM and vehicle optics. Till someone decides this is a real threat and develops a lens coating against it.
5-Dec
The TPL site lists a few such systems for sale
Appear to use a laser to get a lens reflection.
5-Dec
Farmplinker said:So monoculars for observing targets would be safe?
Only if your monocular is made of only one lens, like this one :
5-Dec
Reminds me of shining a flashlight at night and seeing the glow of animal eyes.
I wonder about double pane windows too.
Either way the thermal signature of the person holding the rifle is bound to be way larger than the reflective signature of the optic, and thermals are passive. Since this device emits to discover lenses, would probably start seeing detectors on the other end if they become prolific, and anything emitting is giving away its position too.
6-Dec
Refleks said:Either way the thermal signature of the person holding the rifle is bound to be way larger than the reflective signature of the optic, and thermals are passive.
Unfortunately, thermal can now be fooled using not very expensive materials.