Hosted by gatnerd
This is intended for people interested in the subject of military guns and their ammunition, with emphasis on automatic weapons.
Latest 28-Nov by Refleks
Latest 28-Nov by stancrist
Latest 28-Nov by Mr. T (MrT4)
Latest 28-Nov by Mr. T (MrT4)
Latest 28-Nov by gatnerd
Latest 28-Nov by gatnerd
Latest 27-Nov by renatohm
Latest 26-Nov by nincomp
Latest 25-Nov by stancrist
Latest 24-Nov by farmplinker2
Latest 24-Nov by farmplinker2
Latest 23-Nov by Mr. T (MrT4)
Latest 23-Nov by schnuersi
Latest 23-Nov by autogun
Latest 23-Nov by gatnerd
Latest 22-Nov by gatnerd
Latest 22-Nov by Mr. T (MrT4)
Latest 17-Nov by gatnerd
Latest 17-Nov by gatnerd
Latest 16-Nov by stancrist
Latest 11-Nov by stancrist
Latest 11-Nov by stancrist
Latest 11-Nov by schnuersi
Latest 11-Nov by smg762
Latest 9-Nov by smg762
Latest 9-Nov by smg762
Latest 7-Sep by EmericD
Latest 9-Nov by smg762
Latest 9-Nov by smg762
Latest 9-Nov by smg762
Latest 3-Nov by graylion
Latest 31-Oct by stancrist
22-Aug
how often do infantry have to carry GMPG ammo? does it weigh them down very much.
if the GMPG was mag-fed, with a polymer 6.5mm, would this be easier for people to carry and generally more practical?
assuming a side-mounted 33-38round magazine
25-Aug
GPMG will be belt-fed. How much ammo the rest of the squad carries will depend on the situation. Low chance of engagement, none. Decent chance of engagement, especially with a peer/near-peer enemy, it would depend. Some would carryaspare belt, but others would carry extra ammunition for RPG, Carl Gustav or grenade launchers. Some might be loaded down with LAAWs. Squad leaders, DMs, and "systems operators" would probably have extra comms.
25-Aug
smg762 said:if the GMPG was mag-fed, with a polymer 6.5mm, would this be easier for people to carry and generally more practical? assuming a side-mounted 33-38round magazine
No. A side-mounted magazine is less practical than belt feed. Such a feed system saw limited use by US forces in WW2, but was soon discontinued.
25-Aug
stancrist said:A side-mounted magazine is less practical than belt feed. Such a feed system saw limited use by US forces in WW2, but was soon discontinued.
Stan, do you know of any comparative testing of otherwise similar automatic rifles with side, bottom or top-mounted mags? On the face of it, each location has its plus and minus points. And then there was the butterfly twin-mag arrangement used in the WW1 Winchester...?
25-Aug
autogun said:do you know of any comparative testing of otherwise similar automatic rifles with side, bottom or top-mounted mags?
No, Tony. I do not.
30-Aug
Interesting point by Karl here
InRange is entirely viewer supported, please consider it:https://www.patreon.com/inrangetvThe SVD is a notorious Soviet era DMR, which has proven itself on t...
30-Aug
graylion said:Interesting point by Karl here
Perhaps, if by "interesting" you mean very dishonest.
- Different types of ammo (5.56 match vs 7.62 ball).
- Different types of guns.
- Different types of optics.
"In fact, if you're watching the footage, it's hit, hit. I'm already sending the second round before I even hear the shooter -- the caller -- call a hit."
ROFL. That is total BS. Almost every time, 1-2 seconds elapsed after a hit was called before Karl fired the second shot.
31-Aug
but surely a mag fed gun is more effiencent because you can easily carry a 33-36 mag in your pocket, wheareas a belt must be put in the rucksack or something similar?