This is intended for people interested in the subject of military guns and their ammunition, with emphasis on automatic weapons.
Latest 6:32 by RovingPedant
Latest 5:45 by gatnerd
Latest 5:34 by gatnerd
Latest 24-Jan by roguetechie
Latest 22-Jan by Mr. T (MrT4)
Latest 21-Jan by mpopenker
Latest 19-Jan by Alpen25
Latest 19-Jan by gatnerd
Latest 16-Jan by gatnerd
Latest 16-Jan by smg762
Latest 16-Jan by BruhMomento
Latest 14-Jan by David Finkel(ish) (mahjong54)
Latest 11-Jan by gatnerd
Latest 10-Jan by mpopenker
Latest 5-Jan by stancrist
Latest 31-Dec by smg762
Latest 27-Dec by bradys555
Latest 26-Dec by smg762
Latest 25-Dec by poliorcetes
Latest 25-Dec by autogun
Isnt the 6.8 fairly overbore? Im sure the LMG would have less barrel life than a 762 equivalent
Going back to the FCS on 6.8, i was surprised that all the guns have a recoiling barrel... if one wanted 700m precision shots, is this going to be a handicap...
surely its better to have a sensor on the barrel and a smart optic that reads the sensor
Actually, barrel life is well in hand.
As far as the recoiling barrel thing, the answer is no.
Does somebody know what is the source of this photo of a mockup that Drummond posted 4 years ago?
he also posted this...i dunno what the round on the far right is
I remember someone here claimed more info, basically the case was loaded with Rocket fuel and ran at 80-100k psi. Some of these proposals we are seeing... I wanted it scaled to 6mm or .257, but I am odd.
I would really like to know how thoroughly that round was tested. Was it fired only in test barrels, or were any machine guns and assault rifles converted?
I'm very skeptical that such a long, thin, un-tapered case would chamber and extract reliably in automatic weapons, especially after propellant residue has accumulated in the chamber.
I suspect it was tested just enough to get velocity readings... a slight taper should not have been impossible. perhaps with the new case designs we are seeing it could be revisited, though the comment I referred to earlier indicated the Propellant would have been hugely expensive.
For all the new case designs, I still think the one DTIC talked about years ago was very promising. It was an Aluminum head, thin stainless steel body.
It saved so much weight in the case that it was stated the loaded weight of the round was reduced enough to allow an extra round for IIRC every 5 rounds.
so 20% Cartridge savings.
With some of the high strength aluminum alloys, I wonder what pressures it could have handled, for the topic of this thread.
found some more recent information on the design. \ I forgot how much I liked NDIA
This particular presentation was about a .338 Norma case for the LW MMG concept. it is a little different from the previous one I had seen that was for 7.62x51mm.
now the aluminum head is on the outside, rather than being inside the stainless steel body. am I converting correctly, is 500 Mpa = 72518.9 PSI?