Hosted by gatnerd
This is intended for people interested in the subject of military guns and their ammunition, with emphasis on automatic weapons.
Latest 4:52 by gatnerd
Latest 4-Jun by gatnerd
Latest 4-Jun by Mr. T (MrT4)
Latest 4-Jun by Mr. T (MrT4)
Latest 11-Apr by DavidPawley
Latest 3-Jun by stancrist
Latest 2-Jun by gatnerd
Latest 1-Jun by Mr. T (MrT4)
Latest 1-Jun by gatnerd
Latest 1-Jun by gatnerd
Latest 1-Jun by gatnerd
Latest 31-May by Mr. T (MrT4)
Latest 28-May by Mr. T (MrT4)
Latest 24-May by stancrist
Latest 24-May by stancrist
Latest 23-May by gatnerd
Latest 23-May by TonyDiG
Latest 22-May by farmplinker2
Latest 20-May by gatnerd
Latest 20-May by stancrist
Latest 18-May by farmplinker2
Latest 16-May by graylion
Latest 16-May by graylion
Latest 16-May by taber10
Latest 15-May by gatnerd
Latest 14-May by Mr. T (MrT4)
Latest 13-May by graylion
Latest 12-May by Harrison Beene (harrisonbeen)
Latest 12-May by farmplinker2
Latest 7-May by EmericD
8-Jan
And this is why I have zero slick sides even though they look kinda cool sometimes.
14-Jan
schnuersi said:poliorcetes said: AFAIK nobody usually uses some of them connected because of the added bulkiness. This is not true. German soldiers use the connectors all the time. As mentioned above you can carry just the rifle with two reloads in a nice and conventient package without donning any of your other gear. That is super practical for all troops who need to have their rifle close by while they perform other tasks.
I said AFAIK - what I can know about is the practices of the Spanish Armed Forces. And they never use the connectors because of weight and bulkiness. Actually in some units they directly cut the connectors in order to carry better the magazines inside the pouchs
Actually G-36 was evaluated worse than either Galil, SiG and AUG during Spanish contest by the evaluators. Industrial reasons of the time precluded Galil adoption, SiG was too expensive and I cannot develop why the chosen one, AUG, was not chosen. The change from the ill-fated CETME L was welcome, but it was not the better option
15-Jan
In Spain, the G-36E was proposed to be purchased in a different color finish to reduce the thermal signature. Extra expenses and the lack of "martial" looks on parade killed the idea. Fast forward a few years and coyote tan and the likes became the all rage...
15-Jan
In fairness to the G36, it did well in this review:
Watch latest videos, sometimes even early releases! Sign up for the newsletter: http://eepurl.com/hkbJYn [or] slateblackindustries (dot) com NewsletterWat...
It also faired well in the infamous 'mud test' done by Forgotten Weapons / Inrange; this same mud killed my beloved AUG and has stopped a number of other rifle designs.
In this video we mud test the infamous G36. Technically this is is a Tommy Built T36, American receiver and mostly German parts (enough American parts to m...
3-Feb
Actually parades were part of the decision and "hasta aquí puedo leer" (this is as far as I can read). In retrospect, the G-36 was not the best decision for the Kingdom's Army.
5-Feb
So the Court ruling against Haenel affect , CR223 manufactured-in-the-period-of-january-2014-to-may-2018 .
I has under an impression that the holes in breach of the HK patent were on the bolt carrier , but no it seems they are drain holes on the buffer tube.
HAENEL is obligated by the Regional Court (LG) in Düsseldorf by a patent law judgement dated the 16.11.2021 (Case No. 4a O 68/20, confirmed by the Higher Regional Court of Düsseldorf, Case No. I-15 U 59/21) to recall the CR223 rifles marketed since 01.01.2014.
The court found that these rifles infringe a HECKLER & KOCH patent specific to the holes in the locking catches and at the bottom of the buffer tube so that water can drain from the tube quickly.
Since the last press reporting presents the facts in a way that is misleading and incomprehensible to the public, HAENEL would like to explain the situation in more detail below:
Most of the CR223 rifles currently in use are not affected by the ruling and are therefore in no need to be recalled.
Most of our customers are using a CR223 model that was manufactured as of June 2018 and has an altered version of the buffer tube which does not have the said holes that the LG and now the OLG have ruled on.
Background:
This recall only affects specific rifles of the CR223 series (2014/2018) delivered from 2014 until May 2018. A small number of rifles may have been delivered in June 2018. The models affected by the recall can be recognised by the presence of several holes in the locking catches and at the bottom of the buffer tube. Three off-centre holes at the bottom of the buffer tube are particularly noticeable and easily recognisable.
2-Mar
The balancedrecoil buffer i mentioned has now been unveiled on IWA show. Part is designed as a drop-in component for a standard ar15 buffer tube ,like counterbalanced Ak uses rack and pinion drive ,
2-Mar
That looks extremely cool man, thanks for sharing.
Look forward to seeing how it performs, and if its legit and makes it to the US, I plan on buying one.
2-Mar
A friend of mine that developed it had it running for almost a year before he patented and launched it . Will likely be availible trough his US webshop https://usa-shop.armanov.com/
Initaly it was developed for PCCs ,but now also for other AR15 formats.