Military Guns and Ammunition
Hosted by gatnerd
This is intended for people interested in the subject of military guns and their ammunition, with emphasis on automatic weapons.
- 3279
MEMBERS - 185992
MESSAGES - 11
POSTS TODAY
Discussions
From: poliorcetes
4/1/21
Or a pistol brace, or whatever. I cannot realise any serious use of such ridiculously long "two-handed pistol" or "broadpistol" or zweihander or whatever
From: graylion
4/1/21
poliorcetes said:Or a pistol brace, or whatever. I cannot realise any serious use of such ridiculously long "two-handed pistol" or "broadpistol" or zweihander or whatever
You know, calling that thing a montante is rather hilariously apt.
From: 17thfabn
7/1/21
From: graylion
4-Jan
smg762 said:It's well known that anything above 50ft lbs is lethal so a 300ft lbs bullet is sufficient. Why add weight and recoil trying to increase that.
"It is? Show me some documentation please."
I seem to remember 50 foot pounds from a British study on artillery and what was the ideal fragment size. I think it was a World War II era study.
They wanted a fragment size that would generate at least 50 foot pounds of energy. If I remember correctly a fragment that generated that amount of energy and struck the torso would cause incapacitation per their studies. Probably not immediate incapacitation in most cases.
From: gatnerd
8/1/21
50ish ft/lbs is 'lethal' ie will penetrate 12" of ballistics gel, so long as the bullet is of sufficient mass and doesn't tumble.
The 50gr 00 buckshot (modern 'OO' is actually more like a real 0 due to the use of wads) is penetrating 12" of ballistic gel at ~700fps impact velocity. 50gr @ ~700fps being similar to a .25 ACP from a pocket pistol.
50gr x 700fps = 54 ft/lbs
That said, 'lethal' is not necessarily incapacitating. For example, a guy about to fire a gun gets tagged in the chest with a .25 ACP. He'll no doubt die or need serious medical attention - but will this occur before he's able to aim and fire his weapon?
For 'maximum effective range' I like to use Supersonic Velocity - 1125fps - as the cutoff.
Pretty much any FMJ bullet of 40gr or more at 1125fps will penetrate 12", and few shoulder fired weapons are accurate outside of their supersonic range. So its an easy, mostly universal metric, thats better then using a minimum energy figure.
From: graylion
12/1/21
So in my head I am using a shortened 6.5 Grendel with 1.5cc case capacity at 440 MPa with a case length of 25mm and a 65gr bullet with a hardened steel core and a copper "sabot" and an ogive length of 15mm, for a COAL of 40mm. E0 is ca 1500J.
Drop at 300m is 9,5", transsonic speed is reached at around 600 yds.
Given that the cartridge is a lot fatter than 5.7x28, I assume that the mag capacity would be somewhere around 30, but it would be thicker.
I would suggest an integrated moderator, swallowing a lot of bang and some of the recoil. Add a folding stock and call it a PDW ;)
This could be - with a bit of difficulty - carried in a thigh holster. Now I get that this is probably not for the US, since the M4 probably fills this role as long as there are billions of rounds of 5.56 available.
From: smg762
12/1/21
It would struggle to reach 1500j in a PDW barrel. The 300blackout has that energy in short barrels, but this is because theres more swept volume due to wider and far heavier bullets.
Slimmer caliber equals low short barrel energies.
If you did reach those energies you'd want a fairly hefty barrel for any controllability. The Sig rattler is a tiny 300black gun and it has a real heavy barrel.
You earlier mentioned ogive length. A 6. 5 round in a 40mm OAL will be very short-for-caliber in terms of bullet length. Whatever a ballistic calculator might be telling you, I can assure you that 300m would see a massive drop in retained energy.
Why not use an MP5 shape with reverse feeding or a mini bullpup. For a small reduction in clip size you could have a longer round. In a far smaller gun