Hosted by gatnerd
This is intended for people interested in the subject of military guns and their ammunition, with emphasis on automatic weapons.
Latest 30-Apr by EmericD
Latest 11:59 by EmericD
Latest 9:31 by Mr. T (MrT4)
Latest 6:48 by Mr. T (MrT4)
Latest 26-Sep by PRM2
Latest 26-Sep by stancrist
Latest 24-Sep by schnuersi
Latest 24-Sep by Mr. T (MrT4)
Latest 24-Sep by farmplinker2
Latest 23-Sep by schnuersi
Latest 22-Sep by Mr. T (MrT4)
Latest 22-Sep by Mr. T (MrT4)
Latest 20-Sep by Mr. T (MrT4)
Latest 20-Sep by Mr. T (MrT4)
Latest 20-Sep by gatnerd
Latest 19-Sep by stancrist
Latest 19-Sep by stancrist
Latest 19-Sep by smg762
Latest 18-Sep by JPeelen
Latest 17-Sep by graylion
Latest 17-Sep by schnuersi
Latest 16-Sep by gatnerd
Latest 14-Sep by smg762
Latest 8-Sep by gatnerd
Latest 7-Sep by EmericD
Latest 5-Sep by stancrist
Latest 4-Sep by renatohm
Latest 4-Sep by Mr. T (MrT4)
4/1/21
Or a pistol brace, or whatever. I cannot realise any serious use of such ridiculously long "two-handed pistol" or "broadpistol" or zweihander or whatever
4/1/21
poliorcetes said:Or a pistol brace, or whatever. I cannot realise any serious use of such ridiculously long "two-handed pistol" or "broadpistol" or zweihander or whatever
You know, calling that thing a montante is rather hilariously apt.
7/1/21
4-Jan
smg762 said:It's well known that anything above 50ft lbs is lethal so a 300ft lbs bullet is sufficient. Why add weight and recoil trying to increase that.
"It is? Show me some documentation please."
I seem to remember 50 foot pounds from a British study on artillery and what was the ideal fragment size. I think it was a World War II era study.
They wanted a fragment size that would generate at least 50 foot pounds of energy. If I remember correctly a fragment that generated that amount of energy and struck the torso would cause incapacitation per their studies. Probably not immediate incapacitation in most cases.
8/1/21
50ish ft/lbs is 'lethal' ie will penetrate 12" of ballistics gel, so long as the bullet is of sufficient mass and doesn't tumble.
The 50gr 00 buckshot (modern 'OO' is actually more like a real 0 due to the use of wads) is penetrating 12" of ballistic gel at ~700fps impact velocity. 50gr @ ~700fps being similar to a .25 ACP from a pocket pistol.
50gr x 700fps = 54 ft/lbs
That said, 'lethal' is not necessarily incapacitating. For example, a guy about to fire a gun gets tagged in the chest with a .25 ACP. He'll no doubt die or need serious medical attention - but will this occur before he's able to aim and fire his weapon?
For 'maximum effective range' I like to use Supersonic Velocity - 1125fps - as the cutoff.
Pretty much any FMJ bullet of 40gr or more at 1125fps will penetrate 12", and few shoulder fired weapons are accurate outside of their supersonic range. So its an easy, mostly universal metric, thats better then using a minimum energy figure.
12/1/21
So in my head I am using a shortened 6.5 Grendel with 1.5cc case capacity at 440 MPa with a case length of 25mm and a 65gr bullet with a hardened steel core and a copper "sabot" and an ogive length of 15mm, for a COAL of 40mm. E0 is ca 1500J.
Drop at 300m is 9,5", transsonic speed is reached at around 600 yds.
Given that the cartridge is a lot fatter than 5.7x28, I assume that the mag capacity would be somewhere around 30, but it would be thicker.
I would suggest an integrated moderator, swallowing a lot of bang and some of the recoil. Add a folding stock and call it a PDW ;)
This could be - with a bit of difficulty - carried in a thigh holster. Now I get that this is probably not for the US, since the M4 probably fills this role as long as there are billions of rounds of 5.56 available.
12/1/21
It would struggle to reach 1500j in a PDW barrel. The 300blackout has that energy in short barrels, but this is because theres more swept volume due to wider and far heavier bullets.
Slimmer caliber equals low short barrel energies.
If you did reach those energies you'd want a fairly hefty barrel for any controllability. The Sig rattler is a tiny 300black gun and it has a real heavy barrel.
You earlier mentioned ogive length. A 6. 5 round in a 40mm OAL will be very short-for-caliber in terms of bullet length. Whatever a ballistic calculator might be telling you, I can assure you that 300m would see a massive drop in retained energy.
Why not use an MP5 shape with reverse feeding or a mini bullpup. For a small reduction in clip size you could have a longer round. In a far smaller gun
12/1/21
He's using a sabot.
You could also use the 6.5 CBJ, for that matter.
Point is, PDW is somewhat loosely defined - the way I see it, PDW is something a non-rifleman (REMF) uses to fight his way to a rifle, so it has to be somewhat effective up to some 20 meters at most.
One must take into consideration the fact that REMF aren't trained well enough to consistently hit anything far away, so a handgun is as good as anything else.
M1 Carbine was a brilliant exception - for a multitude of reasons, including historical moment, it was actually much closer to an assault rifle than to a PDW - but don't expect other weapons to repeat that feat.
You mentioned the Rattler, and you're correct in one thing - a weapon that won't offer significantly better external ballistics from a significantly smaller package is doomed to fail just like the P90 and MP7 have (in the PDW role, that is).