Hosted by autogun
This is intended for people interested in the subject of military guns and their ammunition, with emphasis on automatic weapons.
Latest 10-Apr by larrikin2
Latest 25-Dec by renatohm
Latest 10-Apr by DavidPawley
Latest 10-Apr by hobbes154
Latest 8-Apr by Farmplinker
Latest 8-Apr by tidusyuki
Latest 6-Apr by poliorcetes
Latest 4-Apr by roguetechie
Latest 3-Apr by roguetechie
Latest 3-Apr by gatnerd
Latest 31-Mar by larrikin2
Latest 28-Mar by DavidPawley
Latest 27-Mar by stancrist
Latest 26-Mar by Mr. T (MrT4)
Latest 24-Mar by Mustrakrakis
Latest 24-Mar by poliorcetes
Latest 19-Mar by Refleks
Latest 19-Mar by Wessels3
Latest 18-Mar by Red7272
Latest 16-Mar by DavidPawley
Latest 15-Mar by Mr. T (MrT4)
Latest 15-Mar by mpopenker
Latest 13-Mar by larrikin2
Latest 12-Mar by netsync11
Latest 11-Mar by autogun
23-Dec
From those numbers it looks like the 55 would have the time-of-flight advantage to maybe 300m, and then the 77 would negate the difference.
I wonder if those principles would apply to something like the 4.85x49, if you gave it, say, a 63grain.
23-Dec
smg762 said:From those numbers it looks like the 55 would have the time-of-flight advantage to maybe 300m, and then the 77 would negate the difference.
Out to 400 metres all these rounds perform similarly. The M855 has a BC of about .156 and the mod 262 about .2. The current Russian round is the 7N10bis .176 at 900 mps. The generally low performance of the 5.56x45 is due to the lack of room for projectiles. Increasing the OAL by 5 mm or using a 40 mm case based on the 6.8 SPC are the solutions to that issue.