Latest Dec-4 by kseesar1
Latest Mar-19 by genesmith201
Latest Mar-19 by Pablo0618
Latest Mar-19 by Ganguy
Latest Mar-19 by Joe (jscjr)
Latest Mar-18 by JoeRunde
Latest Mar-16 by gooilers1
Latest Mar-12 by rmbeau
Latest Mar-12 by DMOSS3
Latest Mar-12 by DMOSS3
Latest Mar-11 by DMOSS3
Latest Mar-11 by apba66nyslp
Latest Mar-11 by Windsor Greg (thomvan)
Latest Mar-9 by Windsor Greg (thomvan)
Latest Mar-4 by DMOSS3
Latest Mar-4 by Windsor Greg (thomvan)
Latest Mar-3 by Windsor Greg (thomvan)
Latest Mar-1 by mtdobrow
Latest Mar-1 by CHUB92000
Latest Feb-27 by bogert53
Latest Feb-23 by CHUB92000
Latest Feb-23 by DMOSS3
Latest Feb-23 by JC676
Latest Feb-22 by fuzzy522
Latest Feb-21 by dadoffive01
Latest Feb-21 by JoeRunde
Thanks, Greg. I appreciate your always prompt response! Ira
The best I can suggest is to use the Runner on 2nd & 3rd chart with the bases full for fly outs only, 7,8,9 and 17,18,19.
The runner on 1st always holds unless there's a throw to the plate with a runner running with risk.
I would actually stroke out the Bases Full on a Flyout to LF, CF, and RF. That's really too bad. I will have to come up with some kind of compensation once I get it all figured out.
I thought there may be a maturation process to the FAC deck. I'm glad you are thinking about it. If anyone can figure it out and make it simpler yet better it's you! :)
BTW...how is it intended to handle the 51,52 results on the FAC if an OUT is recorded (51&52). Reference the actual chart to get the OUT result?
Reference the chart. I think I might try to put a reference in to eliminate this chart reference.
Whatever you decide to do will be fair. For now, your suggestion to disregard the bases loaded results on outfield fly outs and use the results for 2nd & 3rd makes good sense. Thanks. Ira
I have been thinking about the FAC card theory. Right now they emulate the boards, but the number of FACs there are to work with means a lot more could be done. While there is only one board result, there are 9 FACs for each board result. D20-17 on the board has one result, a Fly out to LF, with the runners doing something specific to that board. However, with 9 FACs handling the same D20, rather than all saying the same thing it could go something like this:
Flyout LF - Bases Loaded
FAC1 - runner on 3rd scores, others hold
FAC2 - runner on 3rd scores, F! runner on 2nd to 3rd
FAC3 - runner on 3rd scores, F runner on 2nd to 3rd
FAC4 - S runner holds
FAC5 - S arm holds
FAC6 - F runner scores, F runner on 2nd to 3rd
FAC7 - W arm allows runner on 2nd & 3rd to advance
FAC8 - all hold
FAC9 - all hold
I think that’s the beauty of a FAC deck. It gives opportunity for addd detail without having to wade through a chart book or find the appropriate base situation.
I think you're on to the solution. I'm happy to make changes to my FACs. They are a work in progress--a good work. Ira
So here's the latest iteration of the new FAC idea. Let me know your suggestions and thoughts. I'm not sure ground outs should be changed, but I like this for fly outs.