>I don’t think that speciation is what is meant by macro-evolution.<
That is exactly what is meant by macro-evolution, as 'micro-evolution' is defined as minor phylogenic changes over time within a particular species. Like the famous 'black moth vs white moth' thing.
A new species is a new species. Species are defined as reproductively isolated groups of individual organisms. (which still is a fairly 'fuzzy' definition, for sure, as both ligers and tigons exist, and yet lions and tigers are still separate species, and 'species' is a bit harder to define for those organisms that reproduce asexually, like bacteria and fungi.) But regardless of the difficulties regarding the definition of 'species' all speciation events qualify as 'macro-evolution'.
Expecting an elephant to give birth to a hippopotamus is the sort of nonsense that only Creationists from the Discovery Institute would be demanding as 'proof' of evolution.
No, actually, evolution is happening all the time, and speciation events are fairly common. But a wheat plant doesn't magically turn into corn or barley, it might produce a different SPECIES of wheat, given the right conditions.
Some handy links for such conversations:
http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/macroevolution.html
http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/comdesc/
http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/faq-speciation.html
https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/science-sushi/evolution-watching-speciation-occur-observations/
N_J