680 messages in 35 discussions
Latest 6/26/19 by Cstar1
25 messages in 8 discussions
Latest Jul-3 by laddeep
84 messages in 26 discussions
86 messages in 2 discussions
868 messages in 37 discussions
772 messages in 119 discussions
453 messages in 55 discussions
546 messages in 90 discussions
485 messages in 79 discussions
146 messages in 47 discussions
750 messages in 78 discussions
1886 messages in 117 discussions
42 messages in 13 discussions
I totally agree with him - but is there a plan for reform. IIRC, California and some other states have tried to form nonpartisan commissions for redistricting.
It would be nice. Gerrymandering is crooked.
"Gerrymandering is crooked"
Not to go way off topic, but you do realize you just made a joke - not exactly a pun, but still funny.
From Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Redistricting
In 28 states, the state legislature has primary responsibility for creating a redistricting plan, in many cases subject to approval by the state governor. To reduce the role that legislative politics might play, twelve states (Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Hawaii, Idaho, Missouri, Montana, New Jersey, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Washington) determine congressional redistricting by an independent or bipartisan redistricting commission. Five states: Maine, New York, Rhode Island, Vermont, and Virginia give independent bodies authority to propose redistricting plans, but preserve the role of legislatures to approve them. Seven states have only a single representative for the entire state because of their low populations; these are Alaska, Delaware, North Dakota, South Dakota, Vermont, and Wyoming.
Redistricting has to follow certain criteria to be accepted.
I actually did know i was making a sort of joke... ;)
EIP: North Carolina is no longer classified as a democracy - "North Carolina does so poorly on the measures of legal framework and voter registration, that on those indicators we rank it alongside Iran and Venezuela."#unhackthevotehttps://t.co/wMgqcss1lQ pic.twitter.com/glQVo4Fs9k— Bryan Dawson (@BryanDawsonUSA) December 31, 2017
The ruling was the first time that a federal court had blocked a congressional map because the judges believed it to be a partisan gerrymander.