Hosted by Cindy Dulay (CindyDulay)|Horse-Races.Net
This is a place for friendly and civil discussion of horse racing of all types including handicapping. Hosted by HRN: Horse-Races.Net
Latest Dec-1 by SameSteve G
Latest Dec-1 by RAESFAN
Latest Nov-30 by SameSteve G
Latest Nov-29 by smartyslew
Latest Nov-28 by SameSteve G
Latest Nov-26 by TexSquared
Latest Nov-25 by SameSteve G
Latest Nov-20 by bisket513
Latest Nov-18 by TexSquared
Latest Nov-14 by TexSquared
Latest Nov-10 by ChiefsCrown
Latest Nov-8 by TexSquared
Latest Nov-7 by smartyslew
Latest Nov-7 by TexSquared
Latest Nov-7 by TexSquared
Latest Nov-7 by TexSquared
Latest Nov-6 by Gerh
Latest Nov-6 by bisket513
Latest Nov-5 by Wintertrian
Latest Nov-5 by Wintertrian
Latest Nov-5 by Wintertrian
Latest Nov-5 by Wintertrian
Latest Nov-4 by ChiefsCrown
Latest Nov-4 by ChiefsCrown
Latest Nov-4 by ChiefsCrown
Latest Nov-4 by Wintertrian
Latest Nov-4 by Pedigreestar
Latest Nov-4 by Pedigreestar
Latest Nov-4 by Northof64
Latest Nov-4 by PISTOL9
Latest Nov-3 by PISTOL9
Latest Nov-3 by PISTOL9
Latest Nov-3 by RAESFAN
Latest Nov-3 by Wintertrian
Latest Nov-3 by cubs.fan
Latest Nov-2 by PISTOL9
Latest Nov-2 by TexSquared
Jun-8
Jun-8
smartyslew said...
I'm sorry it upsets you, and it's a pet peeve I hope you retain something positive from it
even with its defects.
I hope you did not misunderstand. Your posting great data is not upsetting.
I meant that Baffert's horses, IMHO, don't really run to their breeding, and/or I don't trust it. So when I look at stats, I just remove those from my view until maybe the 3rd or 4th pass. Or in case of shortened race, I also delete those from my "view" when analyzing.
Its just my way of how my brain "sorts" data.
If I were posting stats for each horse/year, on a forum, like you are, I would of course, include them, and as you say, let the reader/end-user, apply whatever due dilligence to the data as they choose.
Was just pointing out how I assimilate and translate data, on a personal basis. :) Hoping it may be helpful to others.
Jun-8
Jun-8
|
Jun-8
all 9 contenders linebreeding are now listed on this thread
TAPIT SHOES C, 2020 DP = 4-11-12-1-0 (28) DI = 3.00 CD = 0.64,8h,Tapit 3o/Flower Alley 17b
|
Jun-8
Jun-8
I'm going to show Hit Shows splits from the derby and compare to the 3 belmont wire Jobs'.
I think he can rate behind National Treasure and anyone that goes with him and relax
and Go Slower than the Derby splits and be one of the canditates to the 1/8 pole 1st.
any feedbacks ?
Jun-9
TexSquared said...
30 years ago we'd call it the Lukas Program, same thing. How many young horses ruined.
So true.
But few about the breed itself, it's future, or the long term effects of this.
Gamblers just want to win their {short term} bet. Rarely do they talk about the TB breed itself and it's longevity, so no point in looking there.
These conversations do exist, but not on most horse racing boards.
I remember when Steve Roman bowed out. Instead of noticing the breed changing, they just blamed his "theory" and said "it doesn't work". Despite that the whole theory was built around what is truly the measure of CLASSIC distance breeding.
Off this topic, but I watched the KY Derby 14 times, while it's true his jockey moved early, I can still see Mage getting shakey legged at the end there. To me, that says he can't "run all day". Good thing he was not entered in the Belmont, that was a good decision on part of his connections.