A Delphi forum for discussing breaking news, memes, various topics of interest. From the serious to the silly, we discuss the top stories in the news, on Twitter, and in your social media world. Every day, a different story.
6493 messages in 1017 discussions
Latest 7/10/19 by Cstar1
Latest Jan-6 by Showtalk
74 messages in 19 discussions
Latest 6/14/19 by Showtalk
106 messages in 17 discussions
Read the whole thread.
The law was broken by the ILLEGAL ALIENS not our government
Seeking asylum is not against the law.
Yes, taking the government to court for separating families. Unfortunately the line of the government is being sued for, and/or should be sued, puts immigrant kids very low on the court´s priority list.
Two wrongs to do not make a right. Your childish point is like when dad punishes one child, the other child says his brother did it also.
Two separate and individual casess both in law and morally.
Please stick to critizing the topic and not the poster.
Sorry, if it seems if I am critting the poster, I was not, as the poster was simply recycling the arguement that seems to justify the subject, e.g. it is OK to punish the kids, in an illegal way because they are here illegally, often through no fault of their own. The point of this thread is that it does not matter how they got here, what matters is how they are illegally being mistreate at this very moment. Saying that they are here illegally, is an immoral rationalization for what the U.S. is doing to them in the past, right now, in spite of the fact that our government has admitted that they wrong and have stopped doing so, which in fact is not true. This is already an old issue. No matter how bad the bookkeeping has been, if America accepted the immorality of this issue, every kid could have been but in contact with hes parents in less then a week. It is the post to which I was responding that was off topic.
“Your childish point of view” is directed to the poster and that is what I’m referring to when I warned you. Please do not argue with staff (me) at this forum.
Wrong again, it was not personal, it was directed at all childish persons who rationalize bad actions with facts they have not linked to their off topic crits.
This is merely an on topic opinion, not an argument. The only one who has sufficient status to object, is the person to whose post I was posting.
Your status in this site, as a censor of others posts, not addressed to you is not qualified. Any public post opens the poster to crits especially when he
post is off topic.