He's still alive.

I'd take Harold over the other two any day.

At least Harold is unpredictable and has a wide range of topics.

SQUADDYB said:

Well lets face it; three of Delphi's most laughed at persona's have congregated here and are singing kumbaya.

Is there something I should know?

You have a small infestation of dingbats

Stephanie, Richard and Harold have had quite the reputation across the fora. A reputation for the nonsense that they post and their crude stubbornness, an example being, RGoss flipping us off when requested to stop his G replies, etc.

bml00 said:

Shit for brains numbnuts wants to waste more time the pedantic twat http://sights.seindal.dk/sight/179_Arch_of_Titus.html

Thankyou for proving my point - you've now posted the original version in Rome, rather than the replica you tried to pass off as the real thing.

And it is indeed very lacking in detail, with no discussion of why we're to think this is a "triumph" and not, for instance, a religious parade.

The arch is to celebrate the defeat of the Jews and the loot being taken to Rome 

It is breathless that the Arch would be a religious parade with a uniquely Jewish emblem 

The stupidity of this debate is mind blowing 

BM 

https://www.ancient.eu/article/499/

the arch of Titus is not a religious parade it is a celebration of the defeat of the Jews and display of the loot

There are innumerable historical descriptions of the Arch all giving similar explanations

Berry is a liar 

bm

Typical troll response from one with nothing to day. Correcting the spelling while ignoring the point is an indication of a loser.

Sure predictable because probably all of his subjects are off topic, and off the wall when it comes to facts -- it is nice that you identify with him - as in birds of a feather.

RGoss99 said:

Correcting the spelling while ignoring the point is an indication of a loser.

Sure thing.