Confused malcontents swilling Chardonnay while awaiting the Zombie Apocalypse.
Sounds like as usual even before the investigation is complete you spport the mother. Why is that? Were you there? what evidence did you have from a witness that the police action was excessive before posting this?
Sounds like, as usual, you are wrong.
Read post 2 in this thread.
I'm sure you will refuse to acknowledge you made a mistake, so let's not bother.
Could be the same rapists he defended here.
Wait, Goss has his own forum?
Is it nothing but macros?
Another wimp out passive aggressive tactic shirking responsibility for your statements. In this case you say "read [source x]" which I seldom do untill the person posting such a statement commits herself to what she believes I Will find there. So since you provide no evidence you can stand behind, this is a conversation stopper because If I do read it and say the evidence is not there, you have provided yourself with an out and the thread digression goes on indefinitely until you decide to forget it. Example of one of your many faults along this line where you post memes you can´t defend and hope they will go away is your statement that Scottish is not a race, while unable to define race in such a way to prove Scottish is not such.
Shouldn't be a problem. The old goose is not a protected species on here.
It seems he did defend those bastards (La Manada) in here too.
What's wrong with the old guy? I was expecting that from the 93-year-old RW (nameless) who's still partying like it's 1949!!!
So, you read post two, realised you made a mistake and had nothing to say.
Now that is what you so often accuse others of as cowardly.
Usual G=G+1 you refer to an unsourced, e.g. imaginary mistake, then accuse me of not admitting it.
Please read this entire thread until you get back here.
Then, if you make the same claim I will address it.
Until then, you are an unreliable witness to what has happened here.