Confused malcontents swilling Chardonnay while awaiting the Zombie Apocalypse.
Shouldn't be a problem. The old goose is not a protected species on here.
It seems he did defend those bastards (La Manada) in here too.
What's wrong with the old guy? I was expecting that from the 93-year-old RW (nameless) who's still partying like it's 1949!!!
So, you read post two, realised you made a mistake and had nothing to say.
Now that is what you so often accuse others of as cowardly.
Usual G=G+1 you refer to an unsourced, e.g. imaginary mistake, then accuse me of not admitting it.
Please read this entire thread until you get back here.
Then, if you make the same claim I will address it.
Until then, you are an unreliable witness to what has happened here.
Hahahahahaha! LMFAO! I luv ya!!!!!
NO, she is, like so many other people have done, kicking your sorry arse; left, right and center!!!!:>)
Yes, he sure seems to have an insufferable habit of defending men who have raped.
Silence from him.
Nobody likes to be wrong, but when I am - I own up to it.
Actually that is not true because often when I say you are wrong and ask for evidence you don´t own up to it, you either ignore the question, change the subject, or give an irrelevant answer. Example: what is your opinión on someone who calls "scottish" a race, and how do you justify it?
Or to put it another way, since I justified that Scottish a race using the primary, e.g. default definition of "race" how can you justify ignoring it?