This is the successor forum to the original Golf Equipment Aficionados forum or 4GEA
6566 messages in 554 discussions
Latest Jun-24 by Hammer Dog (jaime59)
610 messages in 59 discussions
1226 messages in 113 discussions
240 messages in 19 discussions
78 messages in 9 discussions
34 messages in 15 discussions
673 messages in 63 discussions
483 messages in 31 discussions
23 messages in 9 discussions
28 messages in 4 discussions
295 messages in 47 discussions
Briefly stated, the Gell-Mann Amnesia effect works as follows. You open the newspaper to an article on some subject you know well. In Murray’s case, physics. In mine, show business. You read the article and see the journalist has absolutely no understanding of either the facts or the issues. Often, the article is so wrong it actually presents the story backward-reversing cause and effect. I call these the “wet streets cause rain” stories. Paper’s full of them.
In any case, you read with exasperation or amusement the multiple errors in a story-and then turn the page to national or international affairs, and read with renewed interest as if the rest of the newspaper was somehow more accurate about far-off Palestine than it was about the story you just read. You turn the page, and forget what you know.
That is the Gell-Mann Amnesia effect. I’d point out it does not operate in other arenas of life. In ordinary life, if somebody consistently exaggerates or lies to you, you soon discount everything they say. In court, there is the legal doctrine of falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus, which means untruthful in one part, untruthful in all.
But when it comes to the media, we believe against evidence that it is probably worth our time to read other parts of the paper. When, in fact, it almost certainly isn’t. The only possible explanation for our behavior is amnesia.