Opinion polls on all subjects. Opinions? Heck yes, we have opinions - but we're *always* nice about it, even when ours are diametrically opposed to yours. Register your vote today!
21332 messages in 979 discussions
Latest 3/17/20 by Showtalk
2863 messages in 220 discussions
5641 messages in 300 discussions
6617 messages in 435 discussions
2969 messages in 237 discussions
6222 messages in 142 discussions
1098 messages in 540 discussions
966 messages in 94 discussions
3578 messages in 216 discussions
2895 messages in 126 discussions
7088 messages in 593 discussions
1822 messages in 96 discussions
8204 messages in 415 discussions
12823 messages in 639 discussions
793 messages in 21 discussions
Yes, hard working and over achieving.
Doesn’t everyone who has one want a happy and healthy family?
I used to look at the person before the party. But today politics is so polarized, it doesn't make sense to consider individuality. Because a self thinking representative in search of finding compromise for moving forward, is no longer respected. We are now stuck in a bad marriage that we can't get out of.
I think both sides feel that way. My area is pretty mixed politically and if you can even have a halfway civil discussion in it, you find everyone is confused.
I always vote in the other party's primary, then in the party of preference in the general election.
Why the other primary? Is there a reason or just something you have always done?
Under normal circumstances in this brutally gerrymandered state, the candidate for the party of preference is obvious or even unopposed in state and local elections. I vote in the opposition's party in an effort to increase the vote for the candidate who is not the favored candidate in hopes of creating a run-off. That's when the politics become expensive and down and dirty. If my party of preference had two equally competent candidates running neck and neck, I would vote in that primary. You do not have to be registered with a party to vote in a primary.
Of course, in the general election, there is no need for those tactics.
That is a good idea, but you said cross-party. In some states, there can be two opposing candidates from the same party and none from the opposing party in the general election. Also, they make it almost impossible to vote in the other party primary.