Opinion polls on all subjects. Opinions? Heck yes, we have opinions - but we're *always* nice about it, even when ours are diametrically opposed to yours. Register your vote today!
8694 messages in 430 discussions
Latest 6/13/21 by $1,661.87 in cats (ROCKETMAN_S)
3373 messages in 336 discussions
28196 messages in 1197 discussions
6469 messages in 336 discussions
6919 messages in 455 discussions
3090 messages in 251 discussions
7027 messages in 169 discussions
2905 messages in 1411 discussions
1010 messages in 97 discussions
3874 messages in 230 discussions
4105 messages in 163 discussions
7409 messages in 615 discussions
1866 messages in 103 discussions
14525 messages in 719 discussions
986 messages in 34 discussions
Which is worse, whole plastic bags or millions of pieces
Depends on the size of the organisms that encounter it.
Whole plastic bags are a problem for larger animals, as are the big pieces as it first starts to disintegrate. Then millions of pieces becomes a problem for tiny insects and other things near the bottom of the food chain. The plastic accumulates and displaces nutrients, so critters that ingest the stuff eventually end up starving, if they can't excrete all of it.
The smaller bits might be ingested harmlessly by larger critters, but the smaller critters such as dung beetles could end up with problems from the bits of plastic mixed in the larger critters' feces that the beetles and other tiny things deal with.
Same with dead larger critters that have bits of plastic that have ended up in the flesh and organs in microscopic particles. This stuff probably bio-accumulates. They think everyone now has quite a bit of tiny plastic particles circulating in their bloodstream and in their lungs, and once they get inside they tend to stay.
So we are all victims of plastic. Help!
Indeed. I suspect that if one were to pee in a very clean jar, and then vacuum distill out most of the water, then run the rest through a mass spectrometer, you'd get a surprisingly strong indication of all sorts of microplastics..
That’s a cheery thought.
and if one is cremated after death and the combustion gases are analyzed, there are probably measurable amounts of common plastics that are burned out of the individual cells, that won't ever be excreted during one's lifetime.
Then the traditional burials, if a cemetery is excavated a thousand years from now, one could analyze the bones and teeth to pin down the exact time that person once lived. there will be radionuclides that are products of nuclear weapon tests for everyone who died after about 1945 and microplastics in everyone who died after the late 1980s to early 1990s - which means everyone alive now will have both of these substances in detectable amounts in their remains.
This is much like how you can examine teeth in European cemeteries and see a very distinct time line boundary where most skeletons have extensive tooth decay up to the present, and those skeletons prior to the early 1500s do not have tooth decay.
This is the historical boundary when extensive cheap sugar plantations sprang up in the Caribbean and was imported in such volume that even the poorest peasants could afford a high sugar diet. Prior to then, such tooth decay was only seen among the elites.
So all of us will leave behind remains that indicate we lived in the era after nuclear weapons and after the proliferation of plastics, as well as other chemical signatures of high fructose corn syrup and a few modern pharmaceuticals.
And don't forget the reduction in tooth decay after they started adding fluoride to the water too.
We tend to get used to what we are exposed to and adapt.
Showtalk said...We tend to get used to what we are exposed to and adapt.
How does one adapt when constantly exposed to false media lies and government corruption?
Just asking of course!
Fighting it or giving in. A lot of people just ignore it because it’s too crazy for them.