Opinion polls on all subjects. Opinions? Heck yes, we have opinions - but we're *always* nice about it, even when ours are diametrically opposed to yours. Register your vote today!
2057 messages in 969 discussions
Latest 7/3/21 by $1,661.87 in cats (ROCKETMAN_S)
2985 messages in 236 discussions
24846 messages in 1111 discussions
6313 messages in 320 discussions
6795 messages in 446 discussions
3075 messages in 246 discussions
6881 messages in 157 discussions
966 messages in 94 discussions
3742 messages in 226 discussions
3390 messages in 146 discussions
7274 messages in 605 discussions
1853 messages in 101 discussions
8657 messages in 427 discussions
13742 messages in 682 discussions
935 messages in 29 discussions
If those are all true, help!
If they're all true, we're beyond help.
But I do believe I remember reading a few of them way back when... 80's, 90's or there about!
Maybe they are smarter now than similar politicians were in the past.
Showtalk said...Maybe they are smarter now than similar politicians were in the past.
I'm not so sure about that!
An item about ridiculous questions supposedly asked of travel agents by “clueless” Congresspersons is yet another instance of an old bit of generic humor’s being modified to apply to contemporary politicians. We’ve collected examples of this list of howlers dating from as back as far as 1998, and those earlier versions failed to identify the geographically challenged as members of Congress, instead presenting them as ‘a client,’ ‘a secretary,’ ‘a man,’ ‘another man,’ and so forth. Those earlier versions also began with a preface that trumpeted the collection as “Actual stories from a variety of Travel Agents” rather than the politically repositioned "Actual stories provided by a retiring Washington, D.C. travel agent of 30+ years".
Snopes? You've got to be kidding me. They are about as liberal as it gets.
Which Congressperson paid them to say that?
Which makes me wonder... perhaps all of them were Democrats? (* CHUCKLE *)
Because if all of them were Republicans, Snopes would have never printed this!
Regardless of the factchecking source, surely you didn't think those were true but it would be plausible with some of our current Congress critters, mostly female.
EdGlaze said...surely you didn't think those were true but it would be plausible with some of our current Congress critters, mostly female.
All of them no... some of them yes...