Opinion polls on all subjects. Opinions? Heck yes, we have opinions - but we're *always* nice about it, even when ours are diametrically opposed to yours. Register your vote today!
14528 messages in 719 discussions
Latest Dec-2 by Showtalk
3397 messages in 339 discussions
28269 messages in 1199 discussions
6474 messages in 337 discussions
6937 messages in 455 discussions
3090 messages in 251 discussions
7028 messages in 169 discussions
2930 messages in 1423 discussions
1010 messages in 97 discussions
3879 messages in 230 discussions
4126 messages in 164 discussions
7411 messages in 615 discussions
1866 messages in 103 discussions
8694 messages in 430 discussions
986 messages in 34 discussions
If everybody stuck to facts and truth in their reporting... fact checkers wouldn't be necessary.
It's due to all the liberal's fake new and their calling the truth from Republicans conspiracy theory that's causing all the ruckus and thus a necessity to fact check their fake news and lies. But then they use their own fact checkers in an attempt to falsely claim that the truth the Republicans tell are lies.
Fact checking has become partisan and is therefore no longer valid as it is today.
Yep... but it seems that only the Democrats continue to believe in the fact checking statistics because it attempts to prove the truth as fallacy...
I've heard that fact checkers didn't exist until the truth that one side didn't want made known was delivered on other news media.
Sadly... it always seems to pile up behind the Democrats as the ones spreading fake news, attempting to debunk the truth, lying about what's true and claiming the truth to be conspiracy theory.
If only there were Republicans doing the same... it might be more difficult to differentiate between the two but yet there again... that seems to be the lopsidedness of our progressively liberal counterparts to subterfuge and sabotage the truth for what ever they're interested in pushing.
Fact checkers existed but only for very important news. Otherwise, people agreed more than not. Maybe not with outcomes but they agreed on the main facts.
My opinon is....I detest the word "Woke".
I do too. It means to wake up, past tense.
LOL... yeah... but then we would have to change our vocabulary for a lot of things.
woke (opened my eyes) up this morning.
I came home late and
woke (startled) the neighbor's dog.
(* GRIN *)
The_Rock (JABRONI256) said...Not at all, never said that and certainly am not in favour of that but it cannot be understated that one side is consistently in need of a fact check, although your post leads me to conclude nothing I can say would possibly sway you so let’s leave it there, I don’t feel like talking to a concrete wall
Your statement is so biased against the right that it was a logical conclusion that you felt the left should be unchecked and running wild. Can you explain why you are so biased against the right?
I don't feel the left should be unchecked or running wild, what I want is for the right to be as checked as the left holds itself too, so if Newsmax could be more like WashPo, or OAN more like CNN, where there is at least not outright lying, like the BIG lie which the right keeps perpetuating for no apparent reason but to manipulate the people who are watching, which is exactly what is happening.
The_Rock (JABRONI256) said...or OAN more like CNN, where there is at least not outright lying
Sorry, I had to laugh at that. If you think CNN doesn't distort and lie, then I have some really nice bridges I'd like to sell you.