Opinion Polls: Delphi's Polling Place

Hosted by Showtalk

Opinion polls on all subjects. Opinions? Heck yes, we have opinions - but we're *always* nice about it, even when ours are diametrically opposed to yours. Register your vote today!

  • 4249
    MEMBERS
  • 82962
    MESSAGES
  • 15
    POSTS TODAY

Discussions

Simply stated: Divide and conquer   The Serious You: How Current Events Affect You

Started Jun-2 by WALTER784; 260 views.
WALTER784

From: WALTER784

Jun-2

Simply stated: Divide and conquer

Wherever you stand, please take the time to read this; it ought to scare the beejeebers out of you!

We know Dick Lamm as the former Governor of Colorado. In that context his thoughts are particularly poignant. Last week there was an immigration over-population conference in Washington, DC, filled to capacity by many of America's finest minds and leaders. A brilliant college professor by the name of Victor Hansen Davis talked about his latest book, "Mexifornia," explaining how immigration - both legal and illegal was destroying the entire state of California. He said it would march across the country until it destroyed all vestiges of The American Dream.

Moments later, former Colorado Governor Richard D. Lamm stood up and gave a stunning speech on how to destroy America!

The audience sat spellbound as he described eight methods for the destruction of the United States. He said, "If you believe that America is too smug, too self-satisfied, too rich, then let's destroy America. It is not that hard to do. No nation in history has survived the ravages of time Arnold Toynbee observed that all great civilizations rise and fall and that 'An autopsy of history would show that all great nations commit suicide.'"

"Here is how they do it," Lamm said:

"First, to destroy America, turn America into a bilingual or multi-lingual and bicultural country. History shows that no nation can survive the tension, conflict, and antagonism of two or more competing languages and cultures. It is a blessing for an individual to be bilingual; however, it is a curse for a society to be bilingual. The historical scholar, Seymour Lipset, put it this way: 'The histories of bilingual and bicultural societies that do not assimilate are histories of turmoil, tension, and tragedy.' Canada, Belgium, Malaysia, and Lebanon all face crises of national existence in which minorities press for autonomy, if not independence. Pakistan and Cyprus have divided. Nigeria suppressed an ethnic rebellion. France faces difficulties with Basques, Bretons, Corsicans and Muslims."

Lamm went on:

"Second, to destroy America, invent 'multiculturalism' and encourage immigrants to maintain their culture. Make it an article of belief that all cultures are equal; that there are no cultural differences. Make it an article of faith that the Black and Hispanic dropout rates are due solely to prejudice and discrimination by the majority. Every other explanation is out of bounds.

"Third, we could make the United States an 'Hispanic Quebec' without much effort. The key is to celebrate diversity rather than unity. As Benjamin Schwarz said in the Atlantic Monthly recently: 'The apparent success of our own multi-ethnic and multicultural experiment might have been achieved not by tolerance but by hegemony. Without the dominance that once dictated ethnocentriy and what it meant to be an American, we are left with only tolerance and pluralism to hold us together.' Lamm said, "I would encourage all immigrants to keep their own language and culture. I would replace the melting pot metaphor with the salad bowl metaphor. It is important to ensure that we have various cultural subgroups living in America enforcing their differences rather than as Americans, emphasizing their similarities."

"Fourth, I would make our fastest growing demographic group the least educated. I would add a second underclass, unassimilated, under educated, and antagonistic to our population. I would have this second underclass have a 50% dropout rate from high school."

"My fifth point for destroying America would be to get big foundations and business to give these efforts lots of money. I would invest in ethnic identity, and I would establish the cult of 'Victimology.' I would get all minorities to think that their lack of success was the fault of the majority. I would start a grievance industry blaming all minority failure on the majority plation."

"My sixth plan for America's downfall would include dual citizenship, and promote divided loyalties. I would celebrate diversity over unity. I would stress differences rather than similarities. Diverse people worldwide are mostly engaged in hating each other - that is, when they are not killing each other. A diverse, peaceful, or stable society is against most historical precet. People undervalue the unity it takes to keep a nation together. Look at the ancient Greeks. The Greeks believed that they belonged to the same race; they possessed a common language and literature; and they worshipped the same gods. All Greece took part in the Olympic games. A common enemy, Persia, threatened their liberty. Yet all these bonds were not strong enough to overcome two factors: local patriotism and geographical conditions that nurtured political divisions. Greece fell. "E. Pluribus Unum" -- From many, one In that historical reality, if we put the emphasis on the 'pluribus' instead of the 'Unum,' we will "Balkanize" America as surely as Kosovo.'

"Next to last, I would place all subjects off limits. Make it taboo to talk about anything against the cult of 'diversity.' I would find a word similar to 'heretic' in the 16th century - that stopped discussion and paralyzed thinking. Words like 'racist' or 'xenophobe' halt discussion and debate. Having made America a bilingual/bicultural country, having established multi-cultum, having the large foundations fund the doctrine of 'Victimology,' I would next make it impossible to enforce our immigration laws. I would develop a mantra: That because immigration has been good for America, it must always be good. I would make every individual immigrant symmetric and ignore the cumulative impact of
...[Message truncated]
View Full Message
Dee (DLAINEDEE)

From: Dee (DLAINEDEE)

Jun-2

They have been planning all of this for more then 100 years.  They knew they had to do things slowly in the United States, because if Americans back then, when our males were alpha males, not stupid beta males, would have pushed back.  Would have hung them from the nearest tree.

They had to first, take over the universities, medical and newspapers, before tv came about.  Those were after they got their change agents inside the government to start the payoffs and of course, blackmail.  And the federal reserve, which is NOT federal, and what our Founding Fathers fought against, and warned us about having a central bank.  They had to get that in, and make it appear that it was American.  1913, Jackson rolled over in his grave.

When Carter brought in the Department of Education - Unified School Districts, which was UN-Constitutional and something our founders also warned us against.  They warned us to keep the schools local, that you want the parents to keep a very close eye on what your children are being taught.  To teach the children how to think, NOT what to think.  Now all of our schools are nothing but Marxist training camps.  And those charter schools are the worst.

It's like taking a pie and slicing it into many pieces, and labeling each slice, government, education, media, food, water, medical, so on and so on.  They only had to take over/compromise the people at the very top.  They didn't need to worry about the secretary, or waitress, or bus boy, they just had to get the ones at the top.  They did it.

Oh, and the one thing they absolutely had to do, and they did it, was demonize anyone that spoke the truth.  They made the majority of Americans BELIEVE that anyone that spoke the truth was a CONSPIRACY THEORIST, that was crazy, insane, yada yada, and you should NEVER go see what they have to say.  And now, most Americans will not go see what the other side has to say if the communists in the White House, and the chi con owned mainstream media label them as conspiracy theorists.

Divide and conquer, absolutely.  They want that more then anything.  They want us to kill each other off as much as possible, and beg for the UN army to come in and save us.  So far, that isn't working as well as this spiked protein aka vaccine, will.  They know that at least 100 million to 150 million will die from taking this gene therapy, if not harmed badly/permanently.  Then they will crash the dollar (The Great Reset).

They hated Trump because he felt that every country on this planet should want their country to be 1st, to be great.  He wanted our country to be 1st, which makes sense.  He was opening up our industry and manufacturing and energy.  That pissed them off.  They want the middle class gone.  They spent the last 50+ years destroying our country, moving industry out and making our energy extremely expensive.  How dare this man come in and turn things around.

This virus is their perfect tool.  The vaccine was NOT made because of the virus.  The virus was made because of the vaccine...

What is going on is extremely evil and satanic.  I don't care what your beliefs are, these people, especially at the very top, are full fledged satanists.

My people are destroyed from lack of knowledge.  What he was saying is, My people didn't believe the truth, so they will be destroyed.  How sad is that.

 


 

WALTER784

From: WALTER784

Jun-2

Yep... divide and conquer has been around for hundreds of years. Dividing is also referred to as alienation in much of Marx's works.

The idea of alienation, which Marx takes from Hegel and Ludwig Feuerbach, plays a fundamental role in the whole of his written work, starting with the writings of his youth and continuing through Das Kapital.

He talks about alienated beings, alienated labor, alienated human life, alienation of the worker, economic alienation, political alienation, ideological alienation, you name it.

https://www.britannica.com/topic/Marxism/Analysis-of-society

To alienate... or otherwise divide... was part of his teachings to bring everybody together under his Marxist/Socialist regime.

But we can all see today that thus far, no country has ever successfully implemented and became better by following the failed socialist ideas of past. But many are still trying and as you mentioned, many parts of our current economy are already wavering towards socialism, but we're not there yet.

To get to the last stages of Socialism in America would require confiscating all of our guns and that's going to be quite tough. They continue pushing for gun controls, but there are many Americans whom just will not give up their guns.

Our 2nd Amendment right gave us the right to bear arms and shall not be infringed. We were allowed to bear arms not to hunt, but to keep our government in line should they attempt tyranny against it's people. And as long as we still have our weapons, the government would have a difficult time attempting to remove them from us.

Thomas Jefferson once said: The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants. I do believe that we are heading in that direction in the not too distant future.

FWIW

Dee (DLAINEDEE)

From: Dee (DLAINEDEE)

Jun-2

They'll never get the guns, not without a fight to the death.

They are bringing out that Marxist/communist group BLM.  The ones we saw during all the riots and burning down of blue cities, was just the low hanging fruit.  The cannon fodder.  The ones they plan to bring out this time are the ones they were training under Obama.  A very well armed and trained military force.  Just what Obama said...

They are calling for the death of white people.  Many innocent white people, and Asians also, are being severely beaten all over in blue cities.  Something the mainstink media is covering up, or not reporting it.

If they start killing white people, outside the blue cities, especially, white people are going to fight back.  They want that race war, but it will only be a one sided race war.  BLM and their minions will be killing whites because of the color of their skin.  The white people, on the other hand, will be protecting their lives, they won't care what color you are.  That's the difference.  So who are the real racists in this scenario.

Which comes back to, divide and conquer.

WALTER784

From: WALTER784

Jun-2

Dee (DLAINEDEE) said...

If they start killing white people, outside the blue cities, especially, white people are going to fight back.  They want that race war, but it will only be a one sided race war.  BLM and their minions will be killing whites because of the color of their skin.  The white people, on the other hand, will be protecting their lives, they won't care what color you are.  That's the difference.  So who are the real racists in this scenario.

That would be one big mistake if they do that.

As for who the racists are... as I've been saying for the past 30 years... those who claim racism today are actually the racists themselves. Racism was not a problem in the 1970's. We were all getting along fine. It was from the mid 1980's onward where claims of racism started to exacerbate and have escalated to the levels they are today.

When a white person kills a black person, it's all over the liberal news media but when a black person kills a white person or when a black person kills another black person... you don't see it in the liberal news media.

And we just witnessed over the past several years about all the police incidents where blacks were killed... they riot singing pigs in a blanket... fry 'em like bacon, call them racist, fights for racial justice... The George Zimmerman was one case quite a few years ago but he was a Latino... not a white. And then the George Floyd issue arose and liberal cities across numerous liberal states all started going up in flame. Notice that those cities that were going up in flame were all in Democrat run cities... every las one of them. In fact, the Portland riots are still continuing to this date.

They claim I'm racist because I'm white. But that claim in and of itself is racist. They're labeling me as racist due to my skin color. And what is racism? Differentiation of skin color or differentiation due to skin color. Therefore, they claim that just because my skin color is white... that I'm racist. You cannot get any more racist than that, but now they're claiming that it's me and not they themselves who are the racists.

But hey, isn't that how the liberals have been playing ball for quite some time now? They claim the Republicans are racist when it was the Democrats who created the KKK and Jim Crow. They claim Trump colluded with Russia when in fact it was Hillary Clinton, the DNC and Fusion GPS who created the entire fake Trump-Russia collusion. And they all did it in cahoots with the Russians. So again, the exact opposite of what they claim is actually the truth.

And then they tried to impeach Trump for a "their wording" Quid Pro Quo, when in fact Trump didn't do anything of the sort and which was revealed when he released the full transcripts of his phone conversation with the Ukrainian President. But then you had Joe Biden himself who actually did a Quid Pro Quo with the Ukrainians and there's even video proof of Joe saying that exact thing. So again, it was the Democrats who pulled a Quid Pro Quo with Ukraine and not Trump as they falsely claimed.

But if anybody attempts to kill white people, going back to what I said in my last post:

>>>Thomas Jefferson once said: The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants. I do believe that we are heading in that direction in the not too distant future.<<<

FWIW

Dee (DLAINEDEE)

From: Dee (DLAINEDEE)

Jun-3

I love your meme. :D  The liberal media lies about everything, and when they aren't lying their mouths are closed.  The twist the truth also, which to me anyway is still a lie.

This is from 2018 stats, but yet another lie:

WALTER784

From: WALTER784

Jun-3

Lying, twisting the truth and attempting to hide the truth are not journalistic attributes what so ever... they're manipulative political hacks attempting to smear/discredit someone/something about the opposition party while attempting to hide the real truth about their own political operatives to keep them from looking bad.

Nothing journalistic what so ever... everything to do with a biased political stance.

FWIW

TOP