A data analyst who specializes in election verification.  I did not catch his name.

Frankly, as chaotic and illegal as that audit was, I would hope he wasn't here.  The company had NEVER conducted a federal election audit.  That should raise all kinds of red flags as to appropriateness of the choice, the person who released the machines and voter records had no legal authority to release them, 2nd red flag.  Removal of the votes from AZ state control, which is illegal on both state and federal levels, third red flag.  Removal of the voting machines, fourth red flag.  Inexperience of counters, fifth, no background checks, sixth red flag.  And so it goes.

No he’s an expert. Not sure what his actual job is.  Again, the audit was never going to yield anything because they could not get the data in the form they would need. 

Showtalk said...

You’re not understanding me.  They may be required to keep envelopes but once they are separated from ballots there is no way to put them back together for analysis.

The envelopes are physical evidence. Some states/counties require mail in ballots to have the envelope signed while others don't. For those that do require a signature on the envelope, even if separated, you can match the signature.

But on another note... they destroyed the 30,000 envelopes but had a recorded 100,000 ballots as being sent in when in fact only 30,000 were sent in and the other 70,000 were just printed and added to the ballot stack without being sent in. So where are the other 70,000 envelopes? If they had kept the envelopes, you would either see 100,000 envelopes or you would only see the 30,000 that were actually sent in.

They destroyed evidence which is fraudulent... regardless of whether you can or cannot match them up. That's the point I was talking about. They destroyed evidence!

FWIW

Showtalk said...

Was the loss intentional or is Dominion flawed?

Both. 

Showtalk said...

Why are they still using those systems when they know there were serious problems?

Because they needed those flaws to tilt the count in their direction. 

Showtalk said...

Beyond any fraud, some of the machines didn’t work at all. Some switched votes from R to D and could not be switched back, while the voters were in the booths.

And some wouldn't allow the user to choose a republican candidate either. They could choose a democrat, but not a republican. And there's video evidence of that too.

Showtalk said...

That is all documented but somehow they couldn’t fix it during the election.

They could have, but then the results would not turn out in their favor and thus they didn't fix the problems. 

And strangely... actually not really so strange... a good majority of these problems occurred in largely republican districts. That is NOT a coincidence! It's intentional.

FWIW

At the time of the recount, the proper information was not available to them.

They have a year to get it right.

Showtalk said...

At the time of the recount, the proper information was not available to them.

The proper information was purposefully hidden from them!!!

FWIW

The main fact that all the articles and all the threads ignore is that the audit was illegal.  In AZ under the law, and under federal law, election materials, envelopes, actual Ballots, reviews and Notes cannot be removed from state control in the county of origin.  The audit company took the ballots and the machines out of state control and left them unguarded.  I don't know why people can't understand this.  Its the same as if a burglar entered your home and removed your watch.  The burglar is in illegal possession of your watch.  When the audit company removed the ballots to the coliseum it was theft.  Why is this concept so hard to understand? The ballots and envelopes were kept properly under state control UNTIL the audit company illegally removed them.  If they were separated its the fault of the audit company that illegally moved them.

Grant Woods funeral was held today.  He was a well respected Republican Attorney General in Arizona and served our state exceptionally well.  He has friends and admirers on both sides of the aisle.  This is s brief article on his thoughts on the election, the audit and bits and pieces, of his history.  I met him once and was impressed by his quiet certainty on thr law.  He will be missed,

https://www.nbcnews.com/think/opinion/arizona-audit-draft-latest-sham-election-review-investigate-those-profiting-ncna1279989