Opinion Polls: Delphi's Polling Place

Hosted by Showtalk

Opinion polls on all subjects. Opinions? Heck yes, we have opinions - but we're *always* nice about it, even when ours are diametrically opposed to yours. Register your vote today!

  • 4834
    MEMBERS
  • 117510
    MESSAGES
  • 64
    POSTS TODAY

Discussions

Fair Elections   The Serious You: How Current Events Affect You

Started 11/11/21 by WALTER784; 166800 views.
Msg 1877 of 2192
In reply toRe: msg 1876
WALTER784
Staff

From: WALTER784

Dec-1

Arizona official: I was forced to certify Katie Hobbs' election

'No choice but to vote 'Aye' or I will be arrested and charged'

By Art Moore
Published November 29, 2022 at 4:25pm

As Arizona Republican gubernatorial candidate Kari Lake challenges Maricopa County's certification of the 2022 election in court, the chairman of another county is declaring he voted to certify under duress.
 
"I found out today that I have no choice but to vote 'Aye' or I will be arrested and charged with a felony," said Ron Gould, chairman of the Mohave County Board of Supervisors.
 
Lake's opponent, Arizona Secretary of State Katie Hobbs, who is overseeing the election, has threatened felony charges for officials who don't certify the election.
 
Hobbs is suing Cochise County, which refused to certify by the Monday deadline.
 
Lake's lawsuit against Maricopa County election officials states her desire "that every lawful vote be properly counted and every voter who was eligible to vote be allowed to vote."
 
See Gould's remarks:
 
Breaking
 
"I found out today that I have no choice but to vote "Aye" or I will be arrested and charged with a felony."
 
Ron Gould of the Mohave County Board of Supervisors was told he would be arrested if he did not certify the election.
 
Mohave was certified under duress. pic.twitter.com/Urt0aWIiyM
 
— Kari Lake War Room (@KariLakeWarRoom) November 29, 2022
 
On Monday, as WND reported, following the passionate testimony of poll workers and voters, the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors voted unanimously to certify their election canvass.
 
Lake, who lost to Katie Hobbs by less than 18,000 votes according to the official count, has charged voting tabulator and printing malfunctions suppressed the vote on Election Day, when most of her supporters planned to cast their ballots.
 
Arizona Republican Kari Lake addressing supporters on Thursday, Nov. 17, 2022. (Video screenshot)
 
During the public testimony, a poll observer said that at 7 p.m. on Election Day, when the polls closed, there were 675 people waiting in line at his voting location. Only 150 of those people ended up voting, he said. Another poll observer testified that a vote tabulating machine that was found not to be working the night before the election during a test run, nevertheless, was used the next day. Another poll worker described "complete chaos" as machines broke down and angry voters said they had to get back to work, concluding it amounted to "voter suppression."
 
At the end of the meeting, Maricopa County Recorder Stephen Richer insisted no voter was disenfranchised. Board Chairman Bill Gates acknowledged "this was not a perfect election" but contended the count was accurate.
 
Late Monday afternoon, Lake posted a video update in which she thanked the citizens who spoke at the Board of Supervisors meeting.
 
"Thank you, and God bless each of you," she said. "I am with you."
 
Lake said she is working with "a team of patriotic, talented lawyers" on a legal challenge to the election result.
 
"Arizona, America, if we do not stand up and speak up right now about the most dishonest elections in the history of Arizona, I truly fear for our future," she said.

Arizona official: I was forced to certify Katie Hobbs' election (wnd.com)

FWIW

 
 ReplyToggle Dropdown
Msg 1878 of 2192 to WALTER784WALTER784 
In reply toRe: msg 1867
Showtalk
Host

From: Showtalk

Dec-1

So he wasn’t important enough for “found” votes?

 
 ReplyToggle Dropdown
Msg 1879 of 2192 to WALTER784WALTER784 
In reply toRe: msg 1870
Showtalk
Host

From: Showtalk

Dec-1

Newt Gingrich is doing something similar. He has a huge apparatus evaluating all the nuances of the vote count this year.

 
 ReplyToggle Dropdown
Msg 1880 of 2192 to WALTER784WALTER784 
In reply toRe: msg 1872
Showtalk
Host

From: Showtalk

Dec-1

Exactly. Why aren’t they fixing it?

 
 ReplyToggle Dropdown
Msg 1881 of 2192 to WALTER784WALTER784 
In reply toRe: msg 1873
Showtalk
Host

From: Showtalk

Dec-1

It’s true. I forced it to complete the words election fraud and got some bizarre results.

 
 ReplyToggle Dropdown
Msg 1882 of 2192 to biffaldobiffaldo 
In reply toRe: msg 1875
Showtalk
Host

From: Showtalk

Dec-1

We have had absentee ballots, which has been changed to vote by mail. In 2020 everyone received a mailed ballot.

 
 ReplyToggle Dropdown
Msg 1883 of 2192 to WALTER784WALTER784 
In reply toRe: msg 1877
Showtalk
Host

From: Showtalk

Dec-1

Arrested if he didn’t certify fraudulent results?

 
 ReplyToggle Dropdown
Msg 1884 of 2192 to Showtalkshowtalk 
In reply toRe: msg 1878
WALTER784
Staff

From: WALTER784

Dec-2

Showtalk said...

So he wasn’t important enough for “found” votes?

Nope, they just couldn't dig up enough "found" votes to carry him over the finish line because he lost by so much.

FWIW

 
 ReplyToggle Dropdown
Msg 1885 of 2192 to Showtalkshowtalk 
In reply toRe: msg 1879
WALTER784
Staff

From: WALTER784

Dec-2

Showtalk said...

Newt Gingrich is doing something similar. He has a huge apparatus evaluating all the nuances of the vote count this year.

There are a lot of people looking at every single angle of both the 2020 and 2022 elections. Numerous similarities are starting to appear.

Google's search engine switch is one of them. Note: The article said that neither Bing nor Yahoo saw such a switch so it's Google purposefully changing searches in the Democrats favor and hiding searches from the Republicans.

That's why Musk's purchase of Twitter upset the Democrats so much because they had a monopoly of all the big tech in their hands until Musk stepped in. And that threw a wrench in the spanner works of the Democrats control of all big technology.

FWIW

 
 ReplyToggle Dropdown
Msg 1886 of 2192 to Showtalkshowtalk 
In reply toRe: msg 1880
WALTER784
Staff

From: WALTER784

Dec-2

Showtalk said...

Exactly. Why aren’t they fixing it?

The easiest way to fix it is "NO MAIL IN BALLOTS"!!! PERIOD!!!

Then you only have to worry about absentee ballots.

If you actually mail them out to an invalid or undeliverable address, the post office SHOULD mark them as undeliverable and return them to sender. BUT... what if they were never mailed out? What if they purposefully put incorrect or invalid addresses on them, but never mailed them and just kept then inhouse instead? Just one more loophole in mail in ballots.

If you get rid of mail in ballots, then you don't need drop boxes (another loophole) to collect them either.

Therefore, you either vote in person (on voting day... no early voting) or absentee ballot with valid reason for requesting absentee voting.

Finally, you need to ensure voter registration databases are kept up to date too!

FWIW

 
 ReplyToggle Dropdown
Keep Reading
TOP