Opinion Polls: Delphi's Polling Place
Hosted by Showtalk
Opinion polls on all subjects. Opinions? Heck yes, we have opinions - but we're *always* nice about it, even when ours are diametrically opposed to yours. Register your vote today!
- 4876
MEMBERS - 119528
MESSAGES - 31
POSTS TODAY
Discussions
Fair Elections The Serious You: How Current Events Affect You
Started 11/11/21 by WALTER784; 192728 views.
Staff
From: WALTER784
Jan-8
Showtalk said...
The Supreme Court will not hear it. It’s outside their purview.
If it can be proven that the local State Supreme Court has acted unconstitutionally, our Federal Supreme Court can step up and rescind the unconstitutional activity of the State Supreme Court.
FWIW
Staff
From: WALTER784
Jan-8
MUST READ: Maricopa County 2022 Corruption and How Runbeck Used Spanish-Speaking Employees and Quit Running Counts on Election Day Ballots
By Jim Hoft
Published December 30, 2022 at 8:00am
Arizona voters expect their local elections and any legal proceedings to be handled locally. That is not what happened in the 2022 midterms.
The Kari Lake lawsuit was against the Maricopa Board of Supervisors and the County Recorder. Both are Republican-controlled bodies with 5 of the 6 people registered as Republicans. The Kari Lake legal team had 2 exceptional attorneys, a 3rd behind the scenes, and a few researchers. Maricopa had a cabal of 20 lawyers and their support staff. This included teams from Perkins Coie and the Elias Law Group, both out of D.C. These Republican elected officials solicited legal help from the most notorious DNC hit squads. It’s their best chance to hide the election malfeasance. There’s no longer any doubt which team these officials are on. They hired the DNC’s den of thieves?
The Lake Team stayed in a Phoenix hotel, using a conference room as central command. They noticed the many attorneys helping Maricopa because Perkins Coie had also taken a conference room, in the same hotel. The Lake Team monitored MCTEC tabulation center cameras to keep an eye on ballots. They noticed one feed which showed a 3 hour nighttime meeting between Election Director Scott Jarrett and lawyers. GP reported on this. Jarrett was obviously coached because his testimony changed the next day at trial. Let’s review other chicanery by the judge and this legal scum representing Maricopa.
Superior Court Judge Peter Thompson did not afford Kari Lake a traditional trial. He put them on a clock. He gave both the Plaintiff and Defendants 5.5 hours each to present their case. That’s only 330 minutes. But Thompson oddly allowed any “objections” by opposing counsel to count against Lake’s time. The Maricopa DNC legal team used this gift as part of their strategy. They fought against numerous exhibits and witness questions by the Lake Team. They objected repeatedly using relevance, speculation, standing, foundation, strike statements, and so on. Maricopa had an attorney in the courtroom as a dedicated timekeeper, using a stop watch. At the end of Day One, the Lake Team used 272 minutes and Maricopa only 87.
In one example, the Lake Team wanted to display an exhibit that had signatures. The Defendants rapidly objected citing voter privacy rights, maybe voter signatures from 2020, and so on. Within seconds the witness on the stand, Heather Honey, directly told the judge she could clarify the document. The judge refused her offer and allowed the back and forth banter from attorney’s to continue. This entire time the Maricopa attorneys knew it was just a ballot delivery document. They knew it contained staff signatures, not voter sigs. When the judge finally allowed this simple point to be made, Defendants withdrew their objection and smiled. They just chewed up 20 minutes of Lake’s time.
There were 90 court notations and filings in the 7 days leading up Lake’s Dec. 21st election trial (Evidentiary Hearing). That’s 13 per day. The Maricopa DNC hit squad filed endless motions before the trial to purposely hamper Lake’s legal team. Critical time for trial preparation had to be redirected to these filings and the court required responses. We have seen this done many times before by factions fighting to prevent the truth. We also noticed a brief was filed by former Maricopa Recorder Helen Purcell (R), along with Tammy Patrick of all people. They asked that the case be dismissed, represented by law firms from New York City and Tempe, AZ.
Purcell ran as a Republican and was voted into office as the Recorder seven times between 1988 to 2017. The last person a real Republican would politically align with is Tammy Patrick. She’s on the Board of Directors for CTCL, Senior Advisor for hard left Democracy Fund, and advocates for projects that help Democrats win elections. Patrick was the Compliance Officer for Maricopa Elections several years ago. She somehow obtained a rapid rise within top DNC factions, including a seat on Obama’s Presidential Election Commission. With 20 years running the Maricopa elections, Purcell was the perfect person to assist groups fighting AZ election fraud the last few years. But she didn’t help, and now we know why. She’s with the UniParty.
Purcell never asked the Lake Team to see their evidence, talked with their witnesses, or offered any help. She makes a fool of herself by filing her Amici Curiae Brief. She suggests complaints about election procedures should be made before the election, then cites the Maricopa Election Plan (EPM) and Training documents. The case isn’t about bad rules. It’s about corrupt officials who don’t follow them, or create new ones out of thin air. The Kari Lake case and key witnesses don’t contest the documented procedures. In fact, they provide evidence that Maricopa in many cases followed these procedures. But they DID NOT FOLLOW LAWFUL PROCEDU
...[Message truncated]
Staff
From: WALTER784
Jan-8
HUGE: Wisconsin Township Votes to Process Votes in Polling Place Where Voter Resides – Denies Elites Opportunity to Manufacture Votes at Central Count Voting Center,
By Jim Hoft
Published December 31, 2022 at 9:45am
Wisconsin activist Jefferson Davis sent us this good news from Wisconsin to end the year.
Jefferson writes: Great news from Menomonee Falls, Wisconsin (where I reside) as the Village Board is voting to eliminate Central Count Voting and is returning the processing of absentee ballots to the polling place where the voter resides. I am forwarding you several more screenshots of this breaking development. Thank you for your friendship, leadership, and courage to continue to print the truth.
This is HUGE news! Menomonee Falls is taking back control of their elections.
They will no longer hand over the counting, sorting, managing, and processing of ballots to a Central Voting Center where they sacrifice the sanctity of their ballots to hidden dark figures.
They are taking ownership of their elections.
They are taking control of their elections.
Meeting notes 1 ~ 4 are included in the link below:
FWIW
Staff
From: WALTER784
Jan-9
150,000 Votes In The 2020 Election Not Tied To A Valid Address In Wisconsin: Election Watchdog
BY TYLER DURDEN
FRIDAY, JAN 06, 2023 - 10:20 AM
Election Watch (EW), a Wisconsin election integrity watchdog organization, has discovered that more than 150,000 votes cast in the 2020 presidential election cannot be connected with a valid address.
EW computer analyst Peter Bernegger said the group’s study of Wisconsin’s voter rolls found 45,000 such occurrences involving people who were living out of state in the Nov. 3 ballot, with another 107,000 documented instances on the part of voters who moved to another address within the state and cast a ballot in a different jurisdiction from the one in which they actually reside.
“That’s over 150,000 votes cast in the 2020 presidential election that cannot be tied to a valid address,” said Bernegger. “That’s illegal in the state of Wisconsin.
“Though there may be a reasonable explanation for most of these, the number of instances is so large that if only two out of 10 were nefariously cast votes, that was enough to tip the election to Biden.”
Sandy Alldredge (L) of Wisconsin and her son Jacob Alldredge of Tennessee. (Courtesy of Sandy Alldredge)
Former Wisconsin resident Jacob Alldredge, a 27-year-old industrial engineer living in Tennessee, is a case in point.
“I was outraged to learn that the Wisconsin state voter roll shows that I voted in person at the polls on Nov. 3, 2020, when the fact is I was living, registered to vote, and voted in Tennessee. I was not in Wisconsin that day,” he told The Epoch Times.
“The entire situation distresses me because, without election integrity, your vote doesn’t matter,” said Jacob Alldredge.
“We need reform in our voting system. Fixing this is not an impossible task, but I don’t think people want to solve it.”
One person who said she is most certainly dedicated to solving the problems with Wisconsin’s voting system, especially its “sloppy and inflated voter roll,” is Jacob’s mother Sandy Alldredge.
A self-described “constitutional conservative,” Sandy Alldredge told The Epoch Times that in 2020 she was a volunteer working for the reelection of President Donald Trump.
“When Trump ‘lost’ Wisconsin to Joe Biden by 21,000 votes, many patriots began working hard on cyber efforts to find out what really happened. Their dedication inspired me to get involved, so I got some training and made myself available to help.”
Sandy Alldredge said that after learning that some Wisconsin precincts posted a 103 percent voter turnout in the 2020 election; and that there were 7.3 million registered voters in a state with a total population of 5.9 million, she decided to check out the voting records in her former hometown.
Examining the state voter roll for the town of Delavan, in Walworth County, Sandy Alldredge was shocked to see that her son Jacob was listed as having voted in person at the polling place on Nov. 3, 2020—something she knew first-hand to be impossible.
Sandy Alldredge provided The Epoch Times with a spreadsheet from the state voter roll as it appeared on Aug. 18, 2021, as evidence.
“When we checked the poll book, which every in-person voter is required to sign before being allowed to vote, Jacob’s signature was not on it.
“So why does the official Wisconsin Election Commission record say that he voted at the polls on Nov. 3, 2020?” she asked.
Analyst Bernegger said he intends to file a formal complaint over the Alldredge incident “with” Delavan’s municipal clerk, “not against her.”
Who Changed Voter Roll?
“Hardworking and honest local clerks around our state are being played. The municipal clerks are taking the brunt of the questioning by concerned citizens, and they are answering to the best of their knowledge. From their perspective, everything appears normal. The behind-the-scenes reality is far from it.
“I’m listing John Doe as the respondent because we have not yet determined who the cheater is,” he said.
...[Message truncated]
Staff
From: WALTER784
Jan-9
I think the judge's ruling makes for yet another misdemeanor!!!
Over 333,472 Misdemeanors Committed in Kari Lake’s Election, But Trial Court Judge Shrugged Them Off
Rachel Alexander
Jan 02, 2023
Distrust in the justice system over its refusal to stop voter disenfranchisement is spiraling after Maricopa County Superior Court Judge Peter Thompson dismissedKari Lake’s lawsuit challenging the results of Arizona’s botched midterm election, where Democrat Katie Hobbs was declared the winner. Hobbs was losing in almost every MSM poll and didn’t bother to debate Lake, prompting one of the most prominent progressive journalists in the state to denounce her hiding in her basement as “political malpractice.” Hobbs was such an unremarkable candidate that she has only 177k Twitter followers to Lake’s 834k followers, over 400% fewer.
The Republican Party has a 4% voter registration over Democrats in both Maricopa County and statewide. Despite this, 14% of voters supposedly flipped to oppose Arizona’s top Trump candidates. Just like how no one believed Donald Trump lost the state in 2020 when he led Joe Biden three or four points going into the election, no one believes Hobbs won. This is why instead of being happy and gloating at their win, the left is reacting with a bizarre level of intense anger towards the right.
Lake’s team discovered that over 298,942 ballots delivered to third-party signature verification service Runbeck Election Services on Election Day had no chain of custody, and provided this evidence to Thompson. A Runbeck employee stated there were at least 9,530 duplicate ballots printed and issued with no chain of custody. And two days after the election, 25,000 more ballots were found which lacked a chain of custody, totaling over 333,472 ballots. Under Arizona law here and here, every one of those constitutes a class 2 misdemeanor.
This doesn’t even include all the “Door 3” ballots that were commingled with counted ballots at the vote centers plagued with printing problems; it is unknown how many of them have botched chains of custody.
Detractors assert that the courts do not want to be in the business of deciding elections — conveniently leaving out that plenty of judges around the country have frequently ordered new elections where there was far less evidence of voter disenfranchisement, such as a Georgia House race where merely four people were found to have voted who were ineligible.
Legal expert Robert Barnes pointed out that Thompson required a standard of “intentionality” that wasn’t even required. “Arizona law is clear: even inadvertent errors in election require setting aside result if it casts outcome in doubt,” he tweeted. “Intentionality is NOT required when the error casts actual winner ‘in doubt.’”
Another legal expert, Robert Bowes, observed that Thompson relied upon an old case to require a high bar of clear and convincing evidence. The 1959 case Buzard v. Griffin Thompson cited is no longer the standard; Miller v. Pacacho overruled it in 1994. There, the court stated, “We, therefore, hold that a showing of fraud is not a necessary condition to invalidate absentee balloting. It is sufficient that an express non-technical statute was violated, and ballots cast in violation of the statute affected the election.” Instead, Thompson just blew off all the violations, including the more serious class 2 misdemeanor crimes.
Bowes also pointed out that Thompson “erred by conflating mere ‘misconduct’ by an election official under §16-672(A)(1) with the election official’s intent to affect an election’s outcome. ‘Misconduct’ includes negligent maladministration as well as intentional acts,” he tweeted.
The MSM is ignoring the prosecution threats that county supervisors have received for merely considering conducting a hand count of the ballots. Mohave County Supervisor Ron Gould was threatened with a felony and jail. Hobbs threatened county attorneys into not doing their legal job of representing county supervisors like him. A.R.S. 13-1804, extortion theft, states that it is a class 4 felony to threaten to “Take or withhold action as a public servant or cause a public servant to take or withhold action.”
The Law of Large Numbers contradicts the odds of so many “coincidences” happening in the election to favor Hobbs and the other Democrats who strangely swept Arizona’s top races. The coincidences should reasonably balance out to half favor Hobbs, half favor Lake, but they don’t, they are all in favor of Hobbs.
New votes were recently found in Pinal County favoring Republican Abe Hamadeh in his tight race against Kris Mayes, dropping her lead to only 280, but his case remains dismissed by a judge.
...[Message truncated]
Staff
From: WALTER784
Jan-9
Showtalk said...
Homeless voters?
Non-existing voters. If they don't live at the address, the mail in ballots cannot be delivered to them, but they voted anyway.
FWIW
TOP