Opinion Polls: Delphi's Polling Place
Hosted by Showtalk
Opinion polls on all subjects. Opinions? Heck yes, we have opinions - but we're *always* nice about it, even when ours are diametrically opposed to yours. Register your vote today!
- 4923
MEMBERS - 124202
MESSAGES - 28
POSTS TODAY
Discussions
Fair Elections/Voter Fraud The Serious You: How Current Events Affect You
Started 11/11/21 by WALTER784; 225199 views.
Staff
From: WALTER784
Mar-5
Lodi City Council Member Arrested on Voter Fraud Charges Related to 2020 Election – Stash of Ballots Found at His Home, Over 70 Fake Registrations Linked to His Name
By Jim Hoft
Feb. 18, 2023 11:45 am
On Thursday morning, the San Joaquin County Sheriff’s Office announced new charges against city councilman Shakir Khan who was already facing criminal charges, that are related to the 2020 election.
Khan was accused of using fraud to obtain his city council seat.
Police found numerous sealed and completed ballots when the searched his home on unrelated charges.
Police also found nearly 70 names registered to Shakir Khan’s house, email or phone number.
Khan is accused of undermining and violating the election process in Lodi, California.
Jovan Pulitzer posted the local sheriff’s press conference announcing the charges against Shakir Khan.
KCRA reported:
A judge granted Shakir Khan’s release on his own recognizance on Friday after the Lodi council member appeared in court a day after his arrest on election fraud charges. Khan was wearing an orange jumpsuit and seemingly in good spirits, showing thumbs up to the members of the media and pumping his fists in the air as he walked into a Stockton courtroom. His attorney Allen Sawyer advocated for his release so Khan can return home with his family while ongoing investigations and proceedings in the case continue. Friends and family members calling for his release came out to show their support. Khan faces multiple felony charges that stem from the 2020 election. He is accused of stashing 41 ballots at his home. Investigators also say he registered 23 people to vote at his home and that his email and phone number were used to register 47 others. Body camera footage showed voters telling detectives how Khan allegedly pressured them to vote for him and how he allegedly falsified voter registration documents.
FWIW
Staff
From: WALTER784
Mar-6
They don't have enough people... all their current agents are too busy going after parents and religious people declared as domestic terrorists... </sarcasm off>
FWIW
Staff
From: WALTER784
Mar-6
JUST IN: Arizona Supreme Court Agrees To Expedite Kari Lake’s Election Fraud Lawsuit, Internal Conference Scheduled for MARCH 21 – ORDER INCLUDED
By Jordan Conradson
Mar. 3, 2023 6:45 pm
The Arizona Supreme Court issued a new order on Thursday, granting the motion for expedited consideration of Kari Lake‘s lawsuit against Katie Hobbs and the stolen 2022 Election in Arizona.
The Court scheduled March 21 to consider whether or not they will accept Lake’s new petition. “At the conference, the Court will decide whether to accept review and schedule an oral argument,” states the order.
Responses from Defendants were further ordered to be submitted by March 13.
As The Gateway Pundit reported, Kari Lake filed a ‘Petition For Review’ and a ‘Motion To Expedite’ the consideration of her election fraud lawsuit in the Arizona Supreme Court on Wednesday, March 1.
Read Also: Mike Lindell Reinvents What Started It All — MyPillow 2.0 Has “NEW Temperature-Regulating Technology”
Read the filings and exhibits here.
Lake Tweeted on Wednesday, asking the nation to pray for justice.
The Gateway Pundit reported last month that Lake‘s lawsuit to overturn the rigged and stolen 2022 Gubernatorial Election in Maricopa County was dismissed in the Arizona Court of Appeals. She then followed through on her promise to appeal to the Arizona Supreme Court!
“The court of appeals’ Opinion denying petitioner Kari Lake’s appeal ruled that Arizona election laws don’t matter,” argue Lake’s attorneys.
Read the full order below:
AZ SC Order – Lake v Hobbs by Jordan Conradson on Scribd
In honor of Kari Lake’s continued fight for election integrity, The Gateway Pundit released a limited edition KARI LAKE WON AZ tee shirt. After the fraud of the century in the 2020 Election, the exact same issues — and more — showed up in 2022 and robbed Kari of her rightful seat as Governor of Arizona. SHOW YOUR SUPPORT and get your Kari Lake Won Shirt at THEGATEWAYPUNDITSTORE.COM
USE CODE KARIWON FOR 20% OFF!
Kari Lake WON AZ Classic Tee
The Gateway Pundit will continue to provide updates on Kari Lake’s fight to Save Arizona!
FWIW
Staff
From: WALTER784
Mar-6
Dem lawyers suing to 'make election theft virtually effortless'
Attempting to rid state law of key ballot-integrity provision
By Peter LaBarbera
Published January 30, 2023 at 8:03pm
A new lawsuit filed by three leftist groups in Washington state working with the nation's leading Democrat law firm aims to get rid of the state's requirement for signature verification of ballots.
Republicans including conservative radio talk-show host Jason Rantz are sounding the alarm that if successful, the legal action could open the door for massive election fraud. The Seattle-based KTTH radio voice wrote Sunday that "the result of their lawsuit would make election theft virtually effortless, particularly for illegal immigrants or those taking advantage of the homeless."
The lawsuit brought by El Centro de la Raza, Vet Voice Foundation, Washington Bus and three allegedly disenfranchised Washington voters was filed Nov. 22 by the Perkins Coie, the most prominent Democrat law firm in the nation. Perkins Coie represents the Democrat National Committee, the Democrat Congressional Campaign Committee and many prominent Democrat politicians and affiliated groups.
The suit seeks "an order permanently enjoining Washington election officials from using the Signature Matching Procedure for a purpose other than confirming that the return envelope has been signed." Washington State has a long and established vote-by-mail system statewide.
The Washington State GOP and RNC Research have filed a motion to intervene against the Democrat groups' lawsuit, with the party announcing in a Jan. 17 tweet: "Today we have filed a motion to intervene & stop this blatant attempt to rig our elections."
“The signature verification process is literally, I would call it, the only safeguard we have in our elections right now,” Washington State Republican Party chairman Caleb Heimlich told Rantz. “When we’re mailing out 4.8 million ballots, and right now you have to sign the outside of the envelope, if that goes away, what is in place to verify the identity of the person sending the ballot back in is the person that intended to vote?”
"Signature verification, mandated by Washington law, is the only mechanism an election office has to ensure that the ballot submitted was completed by the registered voter. But plaintiffs argue that the process is arbitrary, prone to errors, and disenfranchises young voters and minority groups," writes Rantz.
"When you sign your name to the ballot envelope, you’re not just providing a signature to be verified. You’re also attesting that you’re not breaking the law by casting the ballot and that oath can be used against you in court if you break election laws," he writes. "The attestation also affirms the voter is a citizen of the United States. To register to vote, you need a driver’s license. But in Washington, illegal immigrants can get a driver’s license without verification of citizenship. Couldn’t this be further abused by taking away a security mechanism?"
A spokesman for King Couny Elections told Rantz that doing away with signature verification would eliminate the current method of comparing the signature on the ballot to the signature on the voter's registration record. Without the ability to compare signatures, election officials would be forced to take the first ballot received under any given voters name.
"What if someone steals one of your ballots?" asked Rantz.
“With signature verification...we’d be able to look at those ballots, see if either or both signatures match what is on file, and then determine action from there, including potential referral to the prosecuting attorney if it looks like the envelope has been signed by someone other than the voter,” the election spokesperson told Rantz on his broadcast.
“Without signature verification, we wouldn’t be able to do that comparison and would accept the first ballot returned for the voter, and reject the second returned. We would no longer have the ability to determine if the second ballot likely came from the voter themselves or another person.”
The lawsuit describes the mission of one of the plaintiffs, El Centro de la Raza, as "to bring critical consciousness, justice, dignity, and equity to all the peoples of the world." The leftist group is known in political circles for its get-out-the-vote efforts. Among other "El Centro" lawsuits was a 2013 filing to overturn the voter-approved Charter School Act allowing the creation of public charter schools.
The lawsuit claims the ballots of
...[Message truncated]
Host
From: Showtalk
Mar-6
What bothers me the. OST about that is the possibility of widespread election theft. We already know there were thousands of cases in key areas where people shows up to vote and were told You already voted. There would be no way to fix that after the fact.
Staff
From: WALTER784
Mar-6
Showtalk said...
They aren’t going to investigate those who helped them get into office.
That's why an independent group needs to do the investigations.
FWIW
Staff
From: WALTER784
Mar-6
Showtalk said...
It doesn’t mean it will go in her favor.
No, but we'll have to wait a few weeks to find out what, if anything will happen.
FWIW
TOP