Opinion Polls: Delphi's Polling Place
Hosted by Showtalk
Opinion polls on all subjects. Opinions? Heck yes, we have opinions - but we're *always* nice about it, even when ours are diametrically opposed to yours. Register your vote today!
- 5089
MEMBERS - 133284
MESSAGES - 29
POSTS TODAY
Discussions
Fair Elections/Voter Fraud The Serious You: How Current Events Affect You
Started 11/11/21 by WALTER784; 404903 views.
Staff
From: WALTER784
Sep-18
If it wasn't approved by the state, then it's illegal. And if it's illegal, then either that vote must be redone using legal procedures or that vote must be nullified!
That would take out at least 3 states and Trump would have won in 2020!
Likewise, if it was illegal in 2020... did they legalize it properly for 2022 or continue to use the illegal 2020l procedure?
FWIW
Staff
From: WALTER784
Sep-18
Then make sure it is nullified before 2024 primaries because it's still illegal until approved by the state!!!
FWIW
- Edited September 18, 2023 10:31 pm by WALTER784
Staff
From: WALTER784
Sep-20
Maryland Election Board Quietly Changes Rules, Threatens Legal Action Against Those Who Challenge Elections Based on Voter Rolls
By Jim H?ft
Sep. 2, 2023 11:00 am
The Baltimore County Board of Elections (BOE) quietly amended Regulation .06, which governs the Non-Disclosure Agreement (NDA) for the purchase of voter registration lists. The change, proposed on February 9, 2023, and later adopted on April 7, became effective on July 10, Uncover DC reported.
Kate Sullivan, a Maryland citizen actively involved in voter canvassing and scrutinizing voter rolls, has raised concerns about recent amendments to an NDA governing the use of voter lists.
During an unrecorded BOE meeting on July 26, board attorney Andrew Bailey read the updated NDA language. According to Kate Sullivan, the board’s presentation of the NDA was conspicuously orchestrated.
Sullivan recalls, “He stood up, looking directly at me, and first said, ‘This is the oath that you sign. We want to read it to all those who purchased the list.’ He did not say there’s updated language. He did not say this is a new oath. He just said this is the oath you sign when you purchase these lists.”
She added, “I felt that the oath he [the Board’s lawyer] read was slightly different from the ones I’ve signed in the past. And sure enough, I went home, did some research, and discovered that the oath language had indeed been changed.”
Sullivan had been directing a legal, nonpartisan volunteer canvass to help Baltimore County clean and properly maintain its voter rolls. Despite being adequately certified to conduct the canvass, she was asked to cease her efforts by the Director of the Baltimore County BOE, Ruie Marie La Voie, citing complaints about the canvassing. Sullivan believes that her activism in challenging the board’s maintenance of voter rolls may have played a role in the change in regulation language.
According to Sullivan, the amended NDA has “new language [that] was a lot more threatening.” She describes the prior oath as essentially being a promise not to use voter lists for commercial solicitations, like door-to-door sales.
However, the new language potentially threatens legal action against those who challenge elections based on the voter rolls they purchased. “It was making it very clear that we understood that if we used this list to challenge elections, then we could be responsible for a misdemeanor or be charged in some way,” Sullivan explained.
WATCH:
UncoverDC obtained both the old and the new versions of the NDA:
Old NDA Sullivan has signed for the last three years:
Under penalty of perjury, I hereby declare, as required by Election Law Article, § 3-506, Annotated Code of Maryland, that the list of registered voters for which I am applying is not intended to be used for commercial solicitation or for any other purpose not related to the electoral process. I am aware that, if I use the list for commercial solicitation or for any other purpose not related to the electoral process, or make the list available to the public or third parties or publish or republish the list in a way that allows it to be used in that manner, I will be guilty, upon conviction of a misdemeanor and subject to punishment under Election Law Article, Title 16, Annotated Code of Maryland.
New NDA:
Under penalty of perjury, I hereby declare, as required by Election Law Article, § 3-506, Annotated Code of Maryland, that the list of registered voters for which I am applying is not intended to be used for commercial solicitation or for any other purpose not related to the electoral process. I am aware that, if I use the list for commercial solicitation or for any other purpose not related to the electoral process, or make the list available to the public or third parties or publish or republish the list in a way that allows it to be used in that manner, I will be guilty, upon conviction of a misdemeanor and subject to punishment under Election Law Article, Title 16, Annotated Code of Maryland.
I also acknowledge and understand that I cannot use the data for any purpose unrelated to the electoral process. I can use the data to register voters, form a political party, qualify as a candidate for public office, circulate a petition, conduct elections and recount, cast and count ballots, finance a campaign, and other activities that meet the definition of “electoral process” as defined in COMAR 33.03.02.01B(1). I will not use this data for investigations into an illegal or suspected illegal infractions or violations of voters’
...[Message truncated]
Staff
From: WALTER784
Sep-20
JUST IN: “We Will WIN Our Lawsuit to Review The Early Ballot Signatures Later This Month” – Kari Lake Releases Statement on Judge’s Order Declaring Maricopa County’s Election Procedures Unlawful
By Jordan Conradson
Sep. 7, 2023 10:15 am
Kari Lake released a statement yesterday, highlighting a recent court order related to Maricopa County’s fraudulent signature verification and telling Americans she has the “utmost confidence” in her upcoming trial on September 21.
A Yavapai County judge last week rejected Defendants’ Motions to Dismiss the Arizona Free Enterprise Club and Restoring Integrity and Trust in Elections’ recent lawsuit to prohibit the Arizona Secretary of State from enforcing illegal election procedures relating to mail-in ballot signature verification. This ruling confirmed that Maricopa County has been conducting elections unlawfully.
The Judge ordered that “the language of the statute is clear and unambiguous,” and the current procedures for verifying mail-in ballot signatures “do not have the force of law.”
This is excellent news, and the order is similar to a recent statement made by a judge in one of Kari Lake’s election-related lawsuits!
However, as The Gateway Pundit reported, Backstabbing a former Trump Attorney General and Uniparty leader Karl Rove were behind this effort. Is there more to this story?
Lake’s statement centers on Maricopa County’s lawless elections and her own lawsuit to examine the fraudulent 2022 mail-in ballot signatures, which is going to trial on September 21 and 25. This evidence is being withheld by Maricopa County and the Secretary of State because it proves the election was stolen and voting by mail is easily corrupted. Lake’s attorneys are expected to file an appeal against the dismissal of her lawsuit to Remove Katie Hobbs from the Governor’s office and fight it all the way to the US Supreme Court if necessary.
Hobbs stole the midterm election–that she oversaw as Secretary of State–by colluding with big tech to censor her opponents, rigging the machines on election day to fail 60% of voters, and inserting hundreds of thousands of bogus ballots with no chain of custody and unchecked signatures.
Kari Lake released the following statement on Wednesday:
HUGE: Court Rules Maricopa County VIOLATED Arizona Signature Verification Law
On Friday, a court found that Arizona’s signature matching process is unlawful. The court said that the “statute is clear and unambiguous,” requiring “the recorder to review the voter’s registration card” and not other documents with the voter’s signature.
Kari Lake Released the Following Statement:
“Maricopa County’s complete abandonment of signature verification standards has allowed for the integrity of our elections to be washed away.
Election laws aren’t suggestions or guidelines, they’re the law. I am thankful the court has reminded Secretary of State Fontes and Recorder Richer of that fact.
Following this ruling, I have the utmost confidence that we will win our lawsuit to review the early ballot signatures later this month.”
FWIW
Staff
From: WALTER784
Sep-20
The Kennesaw State University Election Hacks in Georgia – How the FBI Never Investigated the Reports and Turned on the Whistleblowers Instead
By Jim Hoft
Aug. 21, 2023 8:00 am
We are seeing a pattern here.
Here is the timeline after the 2017 KSU election hacks in Georgia. A FOIA document revealed the FBI never investigated the hacks and turned on the whistleblowers instead.
One of the most detailed examples of the FBI’s failure to investigate election fraud involves Georgia and KSU. Until a few years ago, Kennesaw State University ran the election servers for the State of Georgia. In early 2017 they were hacked, and the FBI was brought in. The FBI purposely shelved their investigation shortly after they opened it.
We can finally explain what happened over the years.
In August 2016 cyber security researchers Logan Lamb and Christopher Gray discovered it was easy to access the Georgia voting databases. This included staff passwords, access to software that runs the devices, and data on their 6.7 million voters. Lamb notified KSU of the security vulnerabilities. KSU asked Lamb to keep quiet. Over the next few months, KSU elections IT staff noticed intrusion attempts by DHS. KSU Elections Systems answered to Brian Kemp, Georgia’s Secretary of State at that time.
In December of 2016, to appease the KSU IT staff, Kemp sent a letter to DHS Secretary Jeh Johnson. He asked why the DHS tried to penetrate Georgia’s election servers at least 10 times. Other DHS attacks were documented to be Nov. 7th and 8th, the day before and day of Trumps election win. But Kemp’s letter only asked about one specific attempt, a week after the election, on November 15th at 8:43 AM. He did not mention these other attacks. The Digital Forensics and Analysis Unit of the DHS OIG were tasked to investigate this one instance. Was it deliberate to focus on just this one instance?
A few months later, in March 2017, the KSU servers were breached. They were hacked, data was deleted, and altered. Because of the previous whistleblower warnings, Kennesaw State’s CIO Stephen Gay was forced to alert their Center for Elections Systems about this “data breach”. Gay also had to contact the FBI. The FBI opened an investigation into the hacking. The FBI went to KSU and made forensic images of the election servers.
Three months later, in June 2017, Republican Karen Handel beat Jon Osoff by 3.8% in a District 6 runoff election. Liberal activists alleged the system might have been hacked. On July 3rd 2017, they filed a lawsuit in Fulton County Superior Court (Curling v. Kemp). Their lawsuit wanted Georgia to replace the outdated (DRE) election machines. The lawyers who defended SOS Kemp in this lawsuit were from the Georgia AG’s office.
Two days after the (Curling v Kemp) lawsuit was filed, the DHS responded to Kemp’s KSU intrusion letter, sent 7 months earlier. The DHS OIG concluded the “November 15th scan” was residual traffic from an employee at the Federal Law Enforcement Training Center. They said that the employee was just checking the Georgia firearms license database. The OIG said Microsoft Engineers even agreed. That was it, case closed. There was no investigation into intrusion occurrences that occurred the day before, during, and day after the 2016 election.
Three days after the (C v K) lawsuit was filed, the administration at KSU had their staff delete all the election servers. Their IT staff admitted they DBAN’d (nuked) the servers. Their internal KSU emails showed on July 6th 2017, that “election hard drives were degaussed three times”. The backup servers were deleted on August 9th. This data removal was kept from the public, until October 2017, when journalists obtained those KSU’s internal emails.
The Georgia AG’s office, those defending Kemp, continued to lie to the Plaintiffs. The AGI said the server data could not be provided, it was deleted before their lawsuit. But the AG’s office knew KSU ordered the servers to be wiped after the lawsuit was filed. These AG lies were made public when the “Georgia Wipes Servers” story broke on October 26th 2017 and showed the KSU emails. A few days later, Assistant AG Cristina Correia withdrew the entire AG’s office from the (C v K) case due to “newly found” conflicts of interest. The Plaintiffs immediately requested the FBI turn over their copy of the KSU servers. The FBI stalled this release for 26 months, with no justification why.
After the GA AG’s office withdrew, the U.S. House held a hearing, in December 2017. FBI Director Wray refused to answer if the FBI was investigating the Georgia KSU election hacking. He wouldn’t even admit if they had the server data. In early 2020 a judge hearing a FOIA case forced the FBI to turn over communic
...[Message truncated]
Staff
From: WALTER784
Sep-21
CISA And AT&T Pushed Connecting Elections To FirstNet, Mark Zuckerberg Paid FirstNet Bills, FirstNet Infested With Hackable Chinese Components
By Guest Contributor
Sep. 2, 2023 9:30 am
Recently, we broke the story that a nationwide cellular network for “public safety” called FirstNet was being used to connect election systems throughout the country.
Previously, it was believed that there could be no centralized national access to the precinct-level election equipment because the disparate networks and equipment used in each voting jurisdiction would make centralized spying or hacking too unwieldy. The existence of FirstNet blows that theory out of the water. Polling places are actively being standardized and federalized, creating the opportunity for central monitoring and manipulation by the federal government and leftist public-private organizations.
These real concerns have already proven to be true, as investigators discovered the Albert Sensor program, whereby the federal government monitors every registration database in the country through a partnership with a secretive non-government organization known as Center for Internet Security (CIS). CIS runs the Election Infrastructure Information Sharing and Analysis Center (EI-ISAC). Put all these moving parts together, and you have an election system that can be monitored and manipulated at every level across the country.
Public documents collected by grassroots researchers, Sophie Anderson, Dr. Charles Bernardin and others, reveal that the federal government and AT&T have been actively pushing jurisdictions to connect their polling places to FirstNet, and that funds from a far-left organization paid the bill for FirstNet in at least one swing state. Ample evidence exists that FirstNet is littered with communist Chinese components, making it a major point of vulnerability from a national security standpoint.
CISA PROMOTES STATEWIDE FIRSTNET ELECTION CONNECTIONS
The Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) supposedly exists to protect critical infrastructure from cyber threats. However, congress recently released a report that CISA has “metastasized into the nerve center of the federal government’s domestic surveillance and censorship operations on social media.” A top priority for CISA has been illegally censoring Americans’ doubts about the integrity of the 2020 election while it pushed the propaganda that the 2020 election was the “most secure in American history.”
To date, CISA has done nothing to investigate the thousands of reports of fraud and irregularities that are still being made about the 2020 and subsequent elections. But CISA has been busy expanding election jurisdictions’ uptake of FirstNet services to connect their precinct election machines.
During the Fall 2021 Government Coordinating Council – which the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) uses to push policy directives to federal, state, and local governments – CISA teamed with a FirstNet representative and officials from New Jersey to promote that state’s implementation of statewide connectivity to AT&T’s FirstNet network. The presentation revealed that New Jersey uses FirstNet compatible Nighthawk Hotspots and Cradlepoint modems which are initially configured by AT&T and connected to the state’s 14,000 electronic pollpads before being delivered to the voting locations.
Slides from the CISA presentation are shown below. All this equipment is centrally accessible by each county’s IT team and FirstNet.
Slides from a CISA presentation of statewide connection to FirstNet in New Jersey
New Jersey’s Guidelines for the Conduct of Early Voting states, “during early voting, e-poll books are directly integrated with the voting system, preparing the ballot card or activating the voting machine.”
This means that all the ballot marking devices and tabulators in New Jersey are also necessarily exposed to FirstNet with the electronic pollpads, leaving the official election results open to manipulation.
The vulnerability created by connecting an entire state’s election system to a single centrally accessible, hackable network is enormous. Couple that with de-facto third party access by AT&T – which is completely unaccountable even to congress – and you have a recipe for election fraud.
PROOF OF A MANIPUATED ELECTION IN MERCER COUNTY, NEW JERSEY
But is there any evidence that New Jersey’s elections have been manipulated? Yes, there is.
...[Message truncated]
Staff
From: WALTER784
Sep-22
‘We Will Not Comply’: Trump Warns ‘COVID Tyrants’ Are Eyeing Lockdowns to Interfere with 2024 Election
KATHERINE HAMILTON
30 Aug 2023
Former president Donald Trump warned on Wednesday that “left-wing lunatics are trying very hard to bring back COVID lockdowns and mandates ” to allegedly interfere with the 2024 presidential election.
“The left-wing lunatics are trying very hard to bring back COVID lockdowns and mandates with all of their sudden fear-mongering about the new variants that are coming. Gee-whiz, you know what else is coming? An election,” the 2024 presidential candidate claimed in a video posted to X.
“They want to restart the COVID hysteria so they can justify more lockdowns, more censorship, more illegal drop boxes, more mail-in ballots, and trillions of dollars in payoffs to their political allies heading into the 2024 election. Does that sound familiar?” he alleged
The 45th president of the United States added that “These are bad people, these are sick people we’re dealing with.”
“But to every COVID tyrant who wants to take away our freedom, hear these words: we will not comply. So don’t even think about it,” he continued. “We will not shut down our schools. We will not except your lockdowns. We will not abide by your mask mandates, and we will not tolerate your vaccine mandates.”
Trump further claimed that the 2020 election was “rigged,” and that his opposition is “trying to do the same thing all over again by rigging the most important election in the history of our country — the 2024 election — even if it means trying to bring back COVID.”
“But they will fail because we will not let it happen,” he said, also promising to “use every available authority” if he is reelected to cut federal funding to any school, college, airline, or public transportation system that imposes a mask mandate or a vaccine mandate.
Trump’s comments come as schools, companies, and hospitals around the country have, once again, imposed mask mandates to purportedly handle the emergence of the EG.5 and BA 2.86 COVID-19 variants. The World Health Organization notably classified the former as a “variant of interest” in early August, although it said the risk to global public health is low. COVID hospitalizations have also ticked up, although they are “still at historic lows.”
President Joe Biden also said last week that he plans to request more money from Congress to develop a fresh coronavirus vaccine, adding he may require everyone to take it whether they have been previously vaccinated or not.
Noticing these pandemic-era trends, social media users and some conservatives in the media space have been speculating that Democrats and health leaders are looking to bring back mandates and lockdowns.
Fact checkers have been quick to jump on the claims, calling them “unsupported.”
“These rumors are utterly false,” Nick Spinelli, a CDC spokesperson, told the left-leaning FactCheck.org.
Lockdowns during the pandemic were largely considered a failure, and were detrimental to Americans’ overall wellbeing. A peer-reviewed study published this year by the Institute for Economic Affairs from researchers, including economics Professor Steve H. Hanke of Johns Hopkins University, found that lockdowns had a “negligible” impact on deaths compared to the “staggering collateral costs.”
Some of those costs include irretrievable learning losses, drug abuse, alcoholism, more suicides, and increased isolation. Ninety-percent of small businesses reported “devastating impacts” from government shutdowns. Many Americans were unable to go to church, while liquor stores remained open. Others postponed weddings, were unable to attend funerals, or were barred from seeing dying loved ones.
Trump: ‘COVID Tyrants’ Eyeing Lockdowns to Interfere with 2024 Election (breitbart.com)
FWIW
Host
From: Showtalk
Sep-22
Covid is spiking now and most people just don’t care. I see few masks and places are as crowded as they ever were.
Staff
From: WALTER784
Sep-22
The whole world is experiencing the same.
So good luck with their attempted shut down!
People won't buy it anymore!
FWIW
TOP