WHO KNEW THAT YOU ARE SUBSIDIZING THEM?

INVESTIGATION PUBLISHED AT SUBSTACK: ELON MUSK'S TWITTER DETRACTORS SUBSIDIZED WITH $10.5 MILLION IN TAXPAYER FUNDS.

A couple weeks ago, 26 activist and progressive policy organizations urged Twitter to reject Musk's offer to buy the platform.

However, our auditors found that nine of these groups benefited from our tax dollars while critics say they try to limit free speech and control the flow of information on Twitter.

On Thursday, Emily Compagno, co-host of Outnumbered on Fox News, cited our report and explained the details.

INVESTIGATION PUBLISHED AT SUBSTACK: IT'S TIME THAT U.S. TAXPAYERS DEFUND THE DAVOS SPONSOR — THE WORLD ECONOMIC FORUM.

Davos. A conference hosted by the World Economic Forum (WEF) where the uber rich strategize their plans to socialize the world order. Tickets are $28,000 and a coveted badge is $50,000.

Memberships in the WEF cost up to $650,000 and the conference kicks off tomorrow, on Sunday.

Yet, our auditors at OpenTheBooks.com found, since 2013, the WEF received nearly $60 million in U.S. taxpayer-funded grants. In fact, the funding came through both the Trump and Obama administrations.

On Friday, we joined The National Desk at Sinclair Broadcast to breakdown all the details.

FWIW

If Twitter brings in so much money why do they need to be subsidized?

Well, the subsidies started under Obama and were probably continued under Trump until just recently.

My question is... why should our tax dollars be subsidized out to Twitter... a private company?

Remember, they started censoring Republicans and some things about Trump from 2015! That's probably when the subsidies started rolling in too. They should be stopped. It's another unnecessary waste of our taxpayer dollars.

FWIW

Political payoffs?