Opinion Polls: Delphi's Polling Place

Hosted by Showtalk

Opinion polls on all subjects. Opinions? Heck yes, we have opinions - but we're *always* nice about it, even when ours are diametrically opposed to yours. Register your vote today!

  • 4735
    MEMBERS
  • 109646
    MESSAGES
  • 5
    POSTS TODAY

Discussions

CDC is covering something up...   The Serious You: How Current Events Affect You

Started Aug-5 by WALTER784; 169 views.
WALTER784
Staff

From: WALTER784

Aug-5

If you received a Covid jab before Aug 2021, it wasn't a vaccine and thus you were not vaccinated.

Ooppppsssssss... the 281 million (that's 85% of 331 million populace) given a jab of something or another wasn't a vaccine and thus they were never vaccinated. 

So guess what... that invalidates the vaccine passports too. And all the mandates also need to be nullified as well!

Unless of course, the CDC redefines the original meanings of "vaccine" and "vaccinated"... which they did in Aug 2021... then they're supposedly safe?!?!?! But does it make we the people safer?

Orwellian: New Emails Confirm CDC Officials Scrambled to Change “Problematic” Definition of ‘Vaccine, Vaccinated’ Because Experimental mRNA Jab Did Not Qualify Under Old Definition

By Julian Conradson
Published July 12, 2022 at 5:20pm

In September 2021, the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) was caught stealthily changing the definition of the word “vaccine,” as well as what it means to be “fully vaccinated,” because the experimental mRNA jab was not meeting the well-established criteria under the old definition – and people were taking notice.
 
Unfortunately for the so-called ‘experts,’ independent journalist Alex Berenson ensured the change did not fly under the radar, as reported by TGP’s Larry Johnson. For sounding the alarm on the CDC’s change, Berenson was suspended permanently from Twitter – but, following a court settlement earlier this month, his account was reinstated.
 
Before the change, the CDC website defined vaccine as:
 
Vaccine – “a product that stimulates a person’s immune system to produce immunity to a specific disease.”
 
But gone are the days of vaccines producing so-called “immunity.” Now, the official CDC definition moves the goal posts and states that the experimental mRNA jab, and vaccines in general, simply “STIMULATE THE BODY’S IMMUNE RESPONSE.”
 
And that’s how you end up with Covid-1984.
 
After the change, via CDC:
 
Vaccine – “a preparation that is used to stimulate the body’s immune response against diseases.”
 
At the time, CDC officials justified their actions by claiming, ridiculously, that the “slight changes” that were made “haven’t impacted the overall definition” of vaccines. In fact, they claimed to be doing the public a favor with the update, as the previous definitions were apparently too confusing for the non-expert layman to understand without a deep understanding of sCiEnCe.
 
This way, the definition is more “transparent,” a CDC spokesperson explained to The Miami Herald:
 
“[The previous definitions could have been] interpreted to mean that vaccines were 100% effective, which has never been the case for any vaccine, so the current definition is more transparent, and also describes the ways in which vaccines can be administered.”
 
Well, sure enough, the CDC’s bogus spin proved to be yet another outright lie, as newly obtained emails that were released by The Epoch Times this week show the communication between frantic CDC officials who were scrambling to change the definition of vaccines because the failures of the experimental jab had become “problematic” in relation to the old definition.
 
In one exchange that was sent by CDC official Alycia Downs on August 25, 2021, she warns her colleagues about how people are beginning to notice that the experimental Covid jab doesn’t even meet the CDC’s own definition. This seems to be when CDC officials began taking notice of the issue. One month later, the definition was changed.
 
So much for “transparency.”
 
From Downs’ email, via The Epoch Times:
 
“The definition of vaccine we have posted is problematic and people are using it to claim the COVID-19 vaccine is not a vaccine based on our own definition,” Alycia Downs, a CDC official, wrote in an email on Aug. 25, 2021, to a colleague.
 
According to The Epoch Times, Downs, along with colleagues Allison Michelle Fisher, Cynthia Jorgensen, Valerie Morelli, and Andrew (no last name given), combined their efforts to come up with the new, orwellian definitions for “vaccine” and “vaccination.”
 
...[Message truncated]
View Full Message
In reply toRe: msg 1
WALTER784
Staff

From: WALTER784

Aug-5

The Covid ‘Vaccine’ Scam

August 3, 2022
By Mark A. Hewitt

“Emergency Use Authorization” (EUA) came into prominence with the “Right to Try” law.  This law was another way for patients who had been diagnosed with life-threatening diseases, who had tried all approved treatment options and who were unable to participate in a clinical trial, to access certain unapproved treatments. 
 
What is the difference between FDA Approval and Emergency Use Authorization?
 
“FDA Approval” from the Food and Drug Administration is an independent, scientifically reviewed approval for medical products, drugs and vaccines.  Approval is based on substantial clinical data and evidence, the product is deemed safe, effective and able to be produced within federal quality standards.  Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) is a mechanism used by the FDA to facilitate making products available quickly during a public health emergency, when there is no other adequate and approved medical product available. 
 
Sen. Kamala Harris of California said during a vice presidential debate that she does not trust the Trump Administration’s push to rush a coronavirus vaccine into production.  When she was asked if Americans should take a vaccine, she responded with, “If the public health professionals, if Dr. Fauci, if the doctors tell us that we should take it, I’ll be the first in line to take it.  Absolutely.  But if Donald Trump tells us that we should take it.  I’m not taking it.”
 
What is the difference between an EUA “vaccine” under President Trump and the same one under President Biden?  One was available and the other became mandatory.
 
Democrats so frightened at least 81 million of their voters that when Joe Biden was elected, they and billions of others around the world raced to get jabbed with what they thought was a typical vaccine.  These are either the inactivated vaccines, which are used for polio and influenza, which kill or inactivate the germ, but retain their ability to produce antibodies to fight future infections; or the attenuated vaccines—those that are used for measles, mumps and rubella as well as chickenpox, which contain a weakened version of the virus, again, to boost antibodies. 
 
What was Sen. Harris going to take?  What is in the EUA “vaccine” exactly?  This new technology—mRNA—has not been FDA approved after over 20 years of research? 
 
Consider there was no vaccine for HIV after 40 years of research.  There were no vaccines for cancer after 100 years of research.  No vaccines for a coronavirus—the common cold or some derivative which historically lasts two years before dying out—such as SARS and MERS.  And yet when a mysterious deadly coronavirus from China appeared on America’s shores, within a year we not only have a “COVID-19 vaccine” but a “vaccine” found by four pharmaceutical companies within a week—with new technology that you will be impressed with.  But there is a catch: we cannot ask any questions, like asking your doctor if 32 pages of side effects is right for you.
 
The unvaccinated wanted to know what’s in the “vaccines.”  Are they inactivated vaccines or attenuated vaccines?  No one knows because there are no documents to attest the EUA concoctions are Wuhan wet market sewer water or the biological equivalent of the FDA Approved vaccine or something else, like mRNA.  It is revealing that the pharmaceutical companies have been unwilling to reveal the contents of their mRNA EUA “vaccines.”  They want to wait 75 years before telling anyone.  Dr. Robert Malone, the inventor of the mRNA technology said the vaccine is gene therapy. 
 
When you have to be poked, prodded, pressured, persuaded, cajoled, guilt-tripped, shamed, lied-to, coerced, threatened, criminalized, dehumanized, and destroyed, you have a tyrant on your hands.  If all of this is necessary to gain your compliance, then you can absolutely be certain that what is being promoted against your will and common sense—no voluntary informed consent allowed—is not in your best interests. 
 
Why were they so hellbent in trying to get every single person on the planet “vaccinated” when Drs. Fauci and Birx knew from the beginning that the “vaccines” were deeply problematic?  They knew there was over twenty years of research on messenger RNA gene therapies that killed all the lab rats and test animals.  Did Fauci and Birx ignore the science and hoped it would work on humans?
 
Why didn’t the government constantly inform its citizenry of the difference between FDA Approved and EUA?
...[Message truncated]
View Full Message
In reply toRe: msg 2
WALTER784
Staff

From: WALTER784

Aug-5

Pfizer, Comirnaty, Moderna, Spikevax, J&J, and AstraZeneca are not vaccines, and will not be vaccines no matter how they try to redefine the word. Redefining a skunk as a rose does not turn the skunk into a rose.
 
Sinovac (China), Sputnik V (Russia), and Covaxin (India), are REAL vaccines, made by weakening or killing the actual Covid virus, putting it back into the body in its highly diluted form, and allowing the body's miraculous natural immune system to take over. One of the now well known effects of the (non) vaccines, by the way, it that they harm or destroy a person's natural immune system, so that a person can no longer protect himself against anything, including cancers.
 
Half the world it seems to me is intentionally being poisoned, while the other half are sitting back and watching like spectators watching a James Bond movie.
 
Please prove me wrong!!!
 
FWIW
 
  • Edited August 5, 2022 11:35 am  by  WALTER784
TOP