Opinion Polls: Delphi's Polling Place

Hosted by Showtalk

Opinion polls on all subjects. Opinions? Heck yes, we have opinions - but we're *always* nice about it, even when ours are diametrically opposed to yours. Register your vote today!

  • 4827
    MEMBERS
  • 117336
    MESSAGES
  • 33
    POSTS TODAY

Discussions

Climate Change farce...   The Serious You: How Current Events Affect You

Started Sep-8 by WALTER784; 4289 views.
Msg 62 of 102
In reply toRe: msg 61
WALTER784
Staff

From: WALTER784

Nov-6

Climate change-obsessed media giants ACTIVELY LIE about hurricanes in total contradiction to actual science

Wednesday, October 05, 2022
by: Ethan Huff

(Natural News) The devastating aftermath of Hurricane Ian in Florida is once again being exploited by the corporate-controlled media to falsely claim that man-made “climate change” is somehow responsible.
 
The claim is that hurricanes are becoming increasingly more common and deadly because the planet is “warming,” which we are told is due to things like fossil fuel use and meat eating. But is any of this true? (Related: Juan Cole, a history professor at the University of Michigan, said in 2019 that “inaction” on climate change will one day “literally sink” the entire state of Florida.)
 
The answer is of course not. But that has never once stopped the media from falsely attributing natural disasters to normal human activity, which is increasingly in the crosshairs of the globalists who want to erase all freedom and liberty under the guise of saving the planet.
 
The reality is that the number of landfalling hurricanes in the United States is decreasing, not increasing. Likewise, there has been no increase in the costs associated with hurricane damage as falsely claimed by the media.
 
“After adjusting for a likely under-count of hurricanes in the pre-satellite era there is essentially no long-term trend in hurricane counts,” says the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), which actively tracks and compiles hurricane data.
 
“The evidence for an upward trend is even weaker if we look at U.S. landfalling hurricanes, which even show a slight negative trend beginning from 1900 or from the late 1800s.”
 
Brighteon.TV
 
Do mainstream media reporters know they’re lying, or are they deceived, too?
 
It turns out that increasingly fewer hurricanes are striking America these days, based on NOAA data. Any claim to the contrary is a bald-faced lie, or at best a contortion of the data.
 
Financial Times (FT) is one of the fake news media outlets that falsely reported on an alleged increase in hurricanes due to global warming. The reality, though, is that the data (FT) used just shows improved hurricane detection due to satellites.
 
You see, back in the 1800s and early 1900s, there were no satellites orbiting the earth. This means that far fewer hurricanes were detected at the time, which framed in just the right way can make it seem like there are more hurricanes today than there were back then.
 
“What are the chances that FT reporter @Aime_Williams didn’t know this?” asked Dr. Michael Shellenberger, M.D., on Twitter. “I would guess close to zero.”
 
“It’s possible that @Aime_Williams was careless but I doubt it. I would bet good money that she read NOAA’s web site, which clearly warns that ‘there is essentially no long-term trend in hurricane counts,’ and chose to ignore it in order to sensationalize.”
 
What about the intensity of hurricanes today versus back then? The corporate-controlled media, including Aime Williams over at FT, are insistent that the hurricanes of today are much, much stronger.
 
Once again, Shellenberger debunks this by pointing to statements straight from the NOAA:
 
“… after adjusting for changes in observing capabilities (limited ship observations) in the pre-satellite era, there is no significant long-term trend (since the 1880s) in the proportion of hurricanes that become major hurricanes.”
 
“We conclude that the data do not provide compelling evidence for a substantial greenhouse warming-induced century-scale increase in: frequency of tropical storms, hurricanes, or major hurricanes, or in the proportion of hurricanes that become major hurricanes.”
 
There you have it, folks. The NOAA is debunking the climate alarmists by reassuring the public that hurricanes are pretty much the same today as they have always been, and may even be decreasing in prevalence.
 
The latest news about media lies concerning climate change and global warming can be found at Climate News | Climate News & Climate Studies.
 
 
FWIW
  • Edited November 6, 2022 12:38 am  by  WALTER784
 
 ReplyToggle Dropdown
Msg 63 of 102 to WALTER784WALTER784 
In reply toRe: msg 62
Showtalk
Host

From: Showtalk

Nov-6

People are so afraid of uncontrollable natural disasters they want someone to blame.  Then maybe we can fix it. Once they accept it’s unfixable, they will be more logical. 

 
 ReplyToggle Dropdown
Msg 64 of 102 to Showtalkshowtalk 
In reply toRe: msg 63
WALTER784
Staff

From: WALTER784

Nov-6

Showtalk said...

People are so afraid of uncontrollable natural disasters they want someone to blame.

Hello... the quagmire of the century... 

They are UNCONTROLLABLE NATURAL DISASTERS... as such, regardless of who anybody wants to place the blame on... they are natural disasters and as such are uncontrollable.

So, if you want to believe that giving the Democrats $30 Trillion will control the uncontrollable... then you need to be locked up in an insane asylum!

Uncontrollable means just that... nobody can control it, and natural means that it occurs on its own as a force of nature which nobody can control.

So, what's with all the bulls##t crap about correcting climate change? It's uncontrollable and thus cannot be controlled!!!

FWIW

  • Edited November 6, 2022 10:31 am  by  WALTER784
 
 ReplyToggle Dropdown
Msg 65 of 102 to WALTER784WALTER784 
In reply toRe: msg 64
Showtalk
Host

From: Showtalk

Nov-6

Science agrees with us. They aren’t following real science.

 
 ReplyToggle Dropdown
Msg 66 of 102 to Showtalkshowtalk 
In reply toRe: msg 65
WALTER784
Staff

From: WALTER784

Nov-6

When those who tell us to follow the science don't follow the science themselves... it's called quackery!

FWIW

 
 ReplyToggle Dropdown
Msg 67 of 102 to WALTER784WALTER784 
In reply toRe: msg 66
Dee (DLAINEDEE)

From: Dee (DLAINEDEE)

Nov-6

WALTER784 said...

When those who tell us to follow the science don't follow the science themselves... it's called quackery!

Exactly!  And why all these billionaires that say global cooling, I mean global warming, I mean climate change is the number one threat, own fortresses on the coast.  Own many vehicles, including limos, jets, helicopters, and yachts.

The co2 that they want to get down to zero, that Al Gore and Bill Gates supports and has had many Ted talks concerning co2, is you and I.  They want us gone.  But, they want us to pay for it first, become poor, and then die.

This is their words.  Why else do they demonize those that don't believe in their crap and can prove them wrong, and desperately want to lock everyone up if they are labeled a climate change denier.

Anyone that knows, and believes, in the Word, knows without any doubt, it is not man that is in charge of destroying this planet, when it is time to destroy it.  They are just the tool, the device, and it won't be because of climate change.

 
 ReplyToggle Dropdown
Msg 68 of 102 to Dee (DLAINEDEE)DLAINEDEE 
In reply toRe: msg 67
WALTER784
Staff

From: WALTER784

Nov-7

Dee (DLAINEDEE) said...

And why all these billionaires that say global cooling, I mean global warming, I mean climate change is the number one threat, own fortresses on the coast.  Own many vehicles, including limos, jets, helicopters, and yachts.

If they want anybody to really listen to them, they need to lead by example. Get rid of their private jets & helicopters and take a commercial flight instead. Get rid of all the gas guzzling cars they own and buy just one EV. Turn off the year round central airconditioning/heating units they have at multiple 5-acre or larger homes and live in a smaller home that doesn't take as much electricity. As for their yachts, unless they have a sail on them, they need to get rid of them too.

Dee (DLAINEDEE) said...

The co2 that they want to get down to zero, that Al Gore and Bill Gates supports and has had many Ted talks concerning co2, is you and I.  They want us gone.  But, they want us to pay for it first, become poor, and then die.

If you get rid of CO2, trees and plants will die. 

Their whole plan is ludicrous. Their global carbon footprint is 16~20 times or more greater than the average American's footprint is. So, if anybody should be forced to cut back, they must be the first ones. Once they reduce their global carbon footprint to that of the average American, then... and only then... should they ask the average American to cut back with them.

FWIW

 
 ReplyToggle Dropdown
Msg 69 of 102 to WALTER784WALTER784 
In reply toRe: msg 68
Showtalk
Host

From: Showtalk

Nov-7

Pelosi has a private jet that we pay for.  She has a $12,000 freezer that costs more to run than most of our entire houses. She’s an elite in her own mind, so she gets away with it.  

 
 ReplyToggle Dropdown
Msg 70 of 102 to Showtalkshowtalk 
In reply toRe: msg 69
WALTER784
Staff

From: WALTER784

Nov-7

John Travolta also has a private jet and runway at his house too. Most of the elites in DC and Hollywood have similar eco-unfriendly homes/vehicles.

FWIW

 
 ReplyToggle Dropdown
Keep Reading
TOP