Opinion Polls: Delphi's Polling Place
Hosted by Showtalk
Opinion polls on all subjects. Opinions? Heck yes, we have opinions - but we're *always* nice about it, even when ours are diametrically opposed to yours. Register your vote today!
- 4913
MEMBERS - 123565
MESSAGES - 4
POSTS TODAY
Discussions
In light of recent info are vaccines ... The Healthy You: Health and Fitness Polls
Started 10/24/22 by WALTER784; 25684 views.
Staff
From: WALTER784
Feb-22
Ben Armstrong: Bombshell report from Naomi Wolf exposed Pfizer’s illegal COVID vaccine trial on 61 kids
Monday, February 06, 2023
by: Kevin Hughes
(Natural News) The latest bombshell report from the team of Dr. Naomi Wolf has exposed Pfizer’s Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) trial illegally conducted on 61 children, according to Ben Armstrong of the New American magazine.
“This comes from the Pfizer document dump that they didn’t want you to see for 75 years. It makes sense why such a huge bombshell would be in there, and it’s just now really been uncovered by the team that works with Wolf,” he said on the Feb. 1 edition of “The Ben Armstrong Show.”
“It is really amazing [how] Pfizer illegally experimented on 61 kids harming 71 percent of them, says Dr. Naomi Wolf. That’s what she’s saying. And if everything she says is true, this would be Nazi-style criminal activity by Pfizer recorded in their own documents.” (Related: Matrixxx Groove: COVID vaccine is a bioweapon that is killing kids.)
Wolf’s team from the Daily Clout – alongside volunteers made up of doctors, lawyers and others – stepped up to go through the Pfizer documents ordered to be made public by a court. According to Armstrong, Pfizer wasn’t working on a vaccine to save people from a pandemic.
He then played footage of Wolf discussing Report No. 54, which contains the illegal vaccine experiment on children. According to Wolf’s team, infants and children under 12 were given the Pfizer mRNA COVID vaccine seven months before pediatric approval. Seventy-one percent – 24 children – suffered serious adverse events.
“If that is not shocking enough, these adverse events occurred in only a three-month period starting on Dec. 1, 2020. And at that time, when no pediatric dose of Pfizer product was approved for use at all in that time frame. Nonetheless, they illegally injected 61 children, half of them under four years old, with this injection,” Wolf said.
Brighteon.TV
The serious cases include a seven-year-old child who had a stroke, two children who suffered facial paralysis and an infant whose kidneys were injured by the injections.
Children injected with the shot suffered average of four reactions
Wolf pointed out that of the 34 patients that experienced adverse events, most of these were girls. These 34 patients reported 132 adverse events, averaging 3.88 reactions per child.
Moreover, an additional 28 cases of adverse events were excluded from the record as details such as height and weight were “not consistent with pediatric subjects.”
She also mentioned that there was no safe dose when the children and babies were injected.
After playing the video, Armstrong explained that Pfizer and other Big Pharma companies developing COVID-19 vaccines were guaranteed immunity from lawsuits because the “emergency use” clause absolved them of any responsibility. Vaccine makers had been lying to the public about the effectiveness of the vaccines as they were aware that they could never cure COVID-19, he added.
“When they were developing this vaccine, they knew it was a scam without doing any trials. They didn’t have to do any trials. The vaccine was a scam because they were injecting it into your blood that cannot cure an airborne virus, and Pfizer knows this. Pfizer knows that it’s literally impossible to cure somebody from an airborne virus and prevent them from contracting it by injecting their immune system that’s in their blood.”
Follow VaccineHolocaust.org for more news about COVID vaccines.
Watch Ben Armstrong expound on Pfizer’s illegal vaccine trial on children on the Feb. 1 edition of “The Ben Armstrong Show” below.
FWIW
Staff
From: WALTER784
Feb-22
UK Regulator Finds Pfizer Guilty of Violating Three Sections of the British Pharmaceuticals Code of Practice
By Jim Hoft
Feb. 6, 2023 7:30 am
A complaint against Pfizer pharmaceutical was filed to the UK’s Prescription Medicines Code of Practice Authority (PMCPA), the regulator responsible for policing promotions of prescription medicines in the UK.
The complaint centered on an interview that was conducted by a medical editor at the BBC, in which Pfizer’s CEO Albert Bourla made comments that were “misleading” about COVID shots for children. On December 2, 2021, this interview also appeared on the BBC website under the category “Health.”
Children’s Health Defense reported:
In the BBC interview, Bourla said it was up to the regulatory agencies to determine whether to approve and distribute vaccines to children under 11, but he thought that “immunising that age group in the UK and Europe would be a very good idea,” according to the PMCPA case report published last week.
At the time, no COVID-19 vaccines had been approved by the U.K.’s Medicines and Health products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) for children under 12, so the panel found Bourla’s comments were in breach of code.
Citing possible disruptions in schooling and the potential for long COVID, Bourla also said, “So, there was no doubt in my mind that the benefits completely were in favour of doing it [vaccinating children against COVID-19].”
He added, “I believe it’s a good idea.”
The panel found these strong opinion statements could lead the public to infer there was no need to be concerned with potential side effects or that the benefits of vaccination outweigh the risks, which had not been determined by the health authorities.
The complaint was filed on Dec. 11, 2021 by Us For Them, “a parent-led campaign group calling for children’s needs to be prioritized during the Covid pandemic response.”
The Us For Them organization believes that children “must be placed front and center in all decisions impacting them. The wellbeing of children should be a guiding principle of public policy making.”
Read the case summary below:
The complainant made specific allegations about statements and claims made in the promotional piece relating to children:
1. ‘Immunising that age group [children under the age of 11] in the UK and Europe would be a very good idea.’
The complainant alleged that by recommending vaccinating healthy British children under the age of 11 against Covid-19, the Pfizer CEO was making a claim for the clinical efficacy and safety of Pfizer’s product and its risk/benefit balance, even though the vaccine had not yet been included in the emergency use temporary approval for use in children this young in the UK.
2. ‘Covid in schools was thriving’. ‘This was disturbing significantly the educational system and there were kids that would have severe symptoms.’
The complainant stated that severe Covid-19 was rare amongst children and school age in the UK and while the virus did circulate in schools, schools had typically reflected community transmission throughout the pandemic. Neither had Covid-19 itself had a significant impact on disturbing children’s education in the UK. The ‘disturbance’ to the UK educational system had resulted from political decisions made by governments, not the virus. Indeed, the complainant knew that the UK had the second highest rates of school closures in Europe, except for Italy – a result of political decisions.
The complainant stated that there was simply no evidence that healthy school children in the UK were at significant risk from the SARS COV-2 virus and to imply that they were was disgracefully misleading.
3. ‘So, there was no doubt in my mind that the benefits completely were in favour of doing it.’
The complainant alleged that this was probably the most egregiously false and misleading of the Pfizer’s CEO’s statements. It completely neglected to consider that there were potential risks to healthy children associated with administration of the Covid-19 vaccine. The complainant referred to a number of documents including a Pfizer leaflet listing side-effects; La
...[Message truncated]
Staff
From: WALTER784
Feb-22
Those who promote vaccines have the responsibility to prove they are safe
BY RHODA WILSON
FEBRUARY 5, 2023
Far too many so-called medical and health journalists are wimpy incompetents who won’t print or broadcast anything which might damage their cosy relationships with the medical establishment and the international pharmaceutical industry.
The power of the pro-vaccination lobby is powerful and far spread. When I wrote a short-lived column for the Oriental Morning Post in China the editors were at first reluctant to publish a column I had written criticising vaccination. Eventually, the editors printed the piece (simply because I refused to provide an alternative). After the column appeared, my book publishers in China wrote to tell me that the Chinese Government had informed them that they could no longer publish my books. My publishers in China had produced four of my books, all of which had sold very well, but they had been told by the Government that only “medical publishing houses” could in future publish books concerned with health care. Other Chinese publishers who had shown great enthusiasm for publishing my books suddenly changed their minds.
I am sometimes told that, as a critic of vaccination, it is my job to prove that vaccines are dangerous and that I should stop criticising vaccination until I have evidence proving that vaccines can be dangerous and are often ineffective. That is a nonsense. It is the responsibility of those who are making, endorsing and giving vaccines to be sure that they are safe. The drug companies have a responsibility to prove that their products are safe and effective. Unfortunately, it is common these days for Governments to allow industries to do things without proving that they are safe, and to then expect opponents to prove that something is unsafe. The same thing happens, for example, with genetic engineering and genetically modified food. The fact is, of course, that it is impossible to produce evidence proving that a procedure doesn’t do something. The onus should, of course, be on those who promote these procedures to produce evidence proving that they are safe. There is no evidence that genetically modified food is safe to eat because the people selling the stuff haven’t done (or been expected to do) any research proving the safety of their product. Opponents and critics are dismissed airily and told that it is their responsibility to prove that genetically modified foods are unsafe. However, without vast sums of money, and access to the company’s laboratories, that simply isn’t possible.
In truth, of course, it is not the job of those who oppose vaccination to prove that it is not safe or effective. Indeed, even with unlimited resources it is nigh on impossible to prove a negative. How can I prove conclusively that the man down the road hasn’t ever cheated on his taxes? How can I prove beyond any doubt that the Government hasn’t ever tapped your telephone?
In a logical, sensible, scientific world it is the job of those who promote vaccination to prove that the procedure is safe and effective in general, and that individual vaccines are safe and effective in use.
Sadly, that isn’t going to happen.
The problem (as the drug companies know only too well) is that when you start doing really serious research there is a real risk that you will obtain results that are commercially inconvenient. And the drug industry, the Government and the medical profession all have a vested interest in ensuring that vaccination programmes continue. If inconvenient truths were uncovered the drug industry would lose billions, the Government would find itself paying out billions in damages and individual doctors would lose thousands of pounds a year in lost fees and bonuses. So, there is no incentive for anyone to do any proper research.
Supporters of vaccination, who ignore this absence of evidence in their favour, have been conned by the establishment into believing that vaccines save lives. They are often abusive and sometimes almost hysterical in their attacks on the few doctors who dare speak out, and on those who dare to try to share the truth about vaccination with patients and with parents of young children. It is, perhaps, not surprising, therefore, that most doctors who worry about vaccines say little and do nothing in public.
However, readers may be interested to know that, contrary to popular opinion, a good many doctors are worried about the medical profession’s unbridled enthusiasm for vaccination. Most (quite sensibly) prefer to remain anonymous.
Here is one (of many) relevant letters which I have received from practising doctors in recent years. This one came from a GP. He wrote:
“Your criticism of vaccines is entirely justified. The medical profession has come under the baleful influence of the drug companies and so doctors have to pretend that vaccines can d
...[Message truncated]
Staff
From: WALTER784
Feb-22
Do You Know Someone with ‘Long COVID’ and Vaccinated? Here’s a Guide for Spike Protein Detox by World Council for Health
By Jim Hoft
Feb. 4, 2023 3:45 pm
For those who have had COVID-19 or who have been vaccinated against it, the World Council for Health (WCH) has issued a guideline for “spike protein detox” to eliminate the risk of developing long-term effects from the spike proteins.
The World Council for Health is a non-profit initiative for the people, that is informed and funded by the people.
“The World Council for Health brings to the table the world’s best health advocates, doctors, innovators, and activists fighting to achieve good health for all. We work collaboratively with 170+ organizations in 40 countries to advance public health knowledge and sensemaking. Together, we take action to defend health freedom and promote healthy lifestyles,” according to its website.
“World Council for Health is committed to clear and open communication. Many of the issues we see in the world today are a result of a lack of transparency and accountability, as well as censorship of important truths,” it added.
So, what is spike protein? The WCH defines it as a part of the coronavirus that attaches to ACE2 receptors on cells. Covid-19 vaccines are a new, still unproven, drug technology that aims to program the cells in our bodies to make spike protein, which in turn is supposed to provoke an immune response to protect the body from the virus.
The SARS-CoV-2 virus contains a spike protein on its surface. If you’ve seen images of the coronavirus, it is the sun-like protrusions often pictured on the outside of the virus.
During a natural infection, spike proteins play a key role in helping the virus enter the cells of your body. A region of the protein, known as the S2, fuses the viral envelope to your cell membrane. The S2 region also allows for the coronavirus spike protein to be easily detected by the immune system, which then makes antibodies to target and bind the virus.
Spike proteins are also produced by your body after taking a Covid-19 jab, and they function similarly in that they are able to fuse to cell membranes. In addition, since they are made in your own cells, your cells are then targeted by your immune system in an effort to destroy the spike protein. Thus, your immune system’s response to spike proteins can damage your body’s cells.
Emerging evidence is also showing that in the nucleus of our cells the spike protein impairs our cells’ ability to repair DNA.
According to WCH, it is important to consider doing a “spike protein detox” as it is a “highly toxic part of the virus, and research has linked the vaccine-induced spike protein to toxic effects.”
The virus spike protein has been linked to adverse effects, such as: blood clots, brain fog, organising pneumonia, and myocarditis. It is probably responsible for many of the Covid-19 vaccine side effects discussed in the WCH post-injection guide.
A Japanese biodistribution study for the Pfizer vaccine found that, in the 48 hours post-vaccination, vaccine particles had travelled to various tissues throughout the body and did not stay at the injection site, with high concentrations found at the liver, bone marrow, and ovaries.
Emerging evidence on spikopathy suggests that effects related to inflammation and clotting may occur in any tissue in which the spike protein accumulates. In addition, peer-reviewed studies in mice have found that the spike protein is capable of crossing the blood-brain barrier. Thus, in humans it could potentially lead to neurological damage if it is not cleared from the body.
The compilation of these lists of herbal and other medicines and supplements was a team effort including medical professionals and scientists from all over the world.
Top ten detox essentials:
Vitamin D
Vitamin C
NAC (N-acetylcysteine)
Ivermectin
Nigella seed
Quercetin
Zinc
Magnesium
Curcumin
Milk thistle extract
Zelenko Protocol was mentioned by the WCH as one of its TOP 10 DETOX GUIDES:
AAPS Covid Guide
AFLD Treatments
FLCCC iRecover Post Vaccine
FLCCC Long Covid
LEF respiratory/immune
Orthomolecular Protocol
Zelenko Protocol
Lessenich Protocol
Yanuck & Pizzorno Integrative
WCH Spike Protein Full Guide
The WCH also notes:
Please do not undertake a spike protein detox without supervision from your trusted health practitioner.
If you or a loved one has a compromised immune system as a result of their lack of a healthy lifestyle or if they suffer from adverse vaccine side effects – you can also try Dr. Zelenko
...[Message truncated]
- Edited February 22, 2023 11:13 pm by WALTER784
Staff
From: WALTER784
Feb-22
Pfertility Megathread: Study Funded By The NIH Finds That 40.2% Of Vaccinated Women Experienced Menstrual Changes
That means that over 40 million women in the United States have had their menstrual cycles affected by the C19 jab.
The Vigilant Fox
Feb 4, 2023
Project Veritas released another breaking story last night featuring Pfizer executive Jordan Trishton Walker. This time, he was caught on camera openly admitting concern about women's cycles and their fertility. As a result, #Pfertility is trending on Twitter.
"There is something irregular about their menstrual cycles...concerning...The vaccine shouldn't be interfering with that...It has to be affecting something hormonal..."
In light of Project Veritas' latest bombshell, we have compiled an array of respected voices speaking out about menstrual and fertility concerns. Doctors, scientists, thought leaders, and women across the globe have been screaming from the rooftops on this subject for years now.
Dr. @RWMaloneMD: "Something's Happening" With Reproductive Health
"All these things (variations in menstrual cycles, onset of menses in post-menopausal women) are pointers that there's something going wrong with the ovaries because the ovaries drive menstruation."
Developing Female Fetuses Could Be Rendered Infertile, but It Will Not Fully Be Known Until 20 Years' Time
Dr. Roger Hodkinson: "These nanoparticles from the clot shot ... are getting through the placenta and ... could be attacking the ovary of the developing female fetus.
Dr. Stephanie Seneff: "In a study that actually traced 'where does the RNA go?' Among the organs, they found the highest level in the spleen, and then among women they found second highest level in the ovaries, which is very problematic for pregnancy."
Dr. Paul Thomas: "If they get this COVID jab into every child ... that might be close to the end of the human race. Because we don't know what it's doing to fertility, but it does not look good. It's looking like it concentrates spike protein in the gonads."
Dr. @naomirwolf: "There's No Visible Way These Materials Leave the Ovaries"
With each shot, the materials accumulate more so in the ovaries.
Dr. Jim Thorp, a fetal-maternal specialist, said, "We don’t know if those eggs are alive after multiple injections."
"Not a New Thing": It's Been Known for 10 Years That Lipid Nanoparticles Accumulate in the Ovaries
@JesslovesMJK: "This was known. This was known by them at the time that they were pushing these products on people, including pregnant women—and women in general."
Dr. @RWMaloneMD discusses the COVID vaccine's effect on the ovaries, causing concerning changes to women's menstrual cycles that the CDC and FDA have largely ignored.
"We have a clear trail of bread crumbs about reproductive toxicity that's not being followed up."
According to a recent sperm study, injection of the mRNA vaccine harms the quality and motility of the sperm.
There was a 15.4% sperm concentration decrease, which led to a total motile count (TMC) reduction of 22.1% compared to pre-vaccination levels.
Dr. Pierre Kory: You Can't Hide from Vaccine Injury When It's In Your Face Every Day
- Neurologists are seeing patients with no risk factors having strokes.
- Oncologists are seeing more cancer cases.
- Gynecologists are seeing all of the fertility and menstrual abnormalities.
Dr. Ryan Cole: "Not only could you be sterilizing your daughter, you could be ruining her heart, you could be inflaming her liver, you [could] be inflaming her brain, her adrenal glands, her spleen, her bone marrow. Children are at zero risk for COVID. Zero. Statistically zero."
Dr. Naomi Wolf: "One of the things his [Bill Gates'] foundation has be
...[Message truncated]
Staff
From: WALTER784
Feb-23
IT’S OFFICIAL: CDC Adds COVID-19 Vaccine to Routine Immunization Schedule for Children and Adolescents (VIDEO)
By Jim Hoft
Feb. 10, 2023 8:00 am
For the first time, the ‘unsafe and ineffective’ COVID-19 vaccine was formally added to the routine immunization schedule for both children and adolescents by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) on Thursday.
It is common knowledge that COVID-19 poses no threat to young children, that mRNA vaccinations against the virus are not effective or safe and that some people have even died after receiving a COVID vaccine. But the CDC and its advisory council continue to push for childhood vaccinations despite all these facts.
Back in October 2022, the CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP), which provides advice and guidance to the Director of the CDC regarding the use of vaccines for the control of vaccine-preventable diseases, voted to recommend COVID-19 to be included in the 2023 childhood immunization schedule in 15 unanimous votes.
ACIP recommended the use of COVID-19 vaccines for everyone as young as 6 months and older. The COVID-19 vaccine and other vaccines may be administered on the same day.
Once CDC approves it, our Department of Health can exercise its rule-making authority to add it to the healthcare and school schedule at any time. And now it’s official.
The recommendation to include the experimental COVID vaccine was approved by the CDC together with doctors, nurses, and pharmacists on Thursday as they are bringing the COVID emergency declaration to an end.
“The 2023 child and adolescent immunization schedule, available on the CDC immunization schedule website, summarizes ACIP recommendations, including several changes from the 2022 immunization schedule,” CDC wrote on its website. “Health care providers are advised to use the tables, notes, and appendix together to determine recommended vaccinations for patient populations.”
“This immunization schedule is recommended by ACIP and approved by CDC, the American Academy of Pediatrics, the American Academy of Family Physicians, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, the American College of Nurse-Midwives, the American Academy of Physician Associates, and the National Association of Pediatric Nurse Practitioners,” CDC added.
The addition of the COVID vaccine gives a more official recommendation to healthcare providers and schools.
“This means COVID-19 vaccine is now presented as any other routinely recommended vaccine and is no longer presented in a special “call out” box as in previous years. This, in a sense, helps ‘normalize’ this vaccine and sends a powerful message to both healthcare providers and the general public that everyone ages 6 months and older should stay up to date with recommended COVID-19 vaccines (including a booster, when eligible), just as they would with any other routinely recommended vaccine,” Dr. Neil Murthy and Dr. A. Patricia Wodi said in a statement.
Routine vaccination of COVID vaccine per CDC:
Primary series:
Age 6 months–4 years: 2-dose series at 0, 4-8 weeks (Moderna) or 3-dose series at 0, 3-8, 11-16 weeks (Pfizer-BioNTech)
Age 5–11 years: 2-dose series at 0, 4-8 weeks (Moderna) or 2-dose series at 0, 3-8 weeks (Pfizer-BioNTech)
Age 12–18 years: 2-dose series at 0, 4-8 weeks (Moderna) or 2-dose series at 0, 3-8 weeks (Novavax, Pfizer-BioNTech)
For booster dose recommendations, see www.cdc.gov/vaccines/covid-19/clinical-considerations/interim-considerations-us.html
Persons who are moderately or severely immunocompromised:
Primary series
Age 6 months–4 years: 3-dose series at 0, 4, 8 weeks (Moderna) or 3-dose series at 0, 3, 11 weeks (Pfizer-BioNTech)
Age 5–11 years: 3-dose series at 0, 4, 8 weeks (Moderna) or 3-dose series at 0, 3, 7 weeks (Pfizer-BioNTech)
Age 12–18 years: 3-dose series at 0, 4, 8 weeks (Moderna) or 2-dose series at 0, 3 weeks (Novavax) or 3-dose series at 0, 3, 7 weeks (Pfizer-BioNTech)
Booster dose: see
...[Message truncated]
Staff
From: WALTER784
Feb-23
Cleveland Clinic confirms that covid jabs systematically DESTROY the immune system, jab after jab, year after year
02/09/2023
By Ethan Huff
Consistently ranked as one of the top health care providers in the United States, the Cleveland Clinic is sitting on data showing that the more a person gets “vaccinated” for covid, the worse off his or her immune function.
One of the first official sources to produce solid data about covid jab (in)effectiveness, the Cleveland Clinic is also one of the few health care providers that did not require its staff members to take the shots, which were always voluntary rather than mandatory.
Some 65,000 people work for the Cleveland Clinic, so internal company data on covid jab uptake and resulting health constitutes a case study all on its own. The outcomes of natural immunity versus jab-induced immunity are easy to see when looking at Cleveland Clinic employees as clinical trial subjects and comparing the health of unvaccinated employees to that of vaccinated employees.
Based on this, it is clear that those who got jabbed for covid are less protected against covid infection than those who left their natural immune system intact. Further, the more covid jabs you take, based on the data, the less protected you are.
The Cleveland Clinic produced a study on all this showing that the original covid injection series is not only ineffective, it is anti-effective – meaning one is better off not getting injected at all.
“It is therefore not a vaccine against the present strain of Covid,” reported The Exposé. “It is an antivaccine. It damages your immune system in a dose-dependent manner. The more shots you took, the more damage you will have done to your immune system.”
Everyone who got “vaccinated” for covid is now effectively anti-vaxxed
If boosted immunity is what the “fully vaccinated” were going for by participating in the Operation Warp Speed scam, then they failed miserably to achieve that goal. The fully jabbed now have anti-protection against covid and likely many other health conditions now that their immune systems are shot.
“Ironically, all those who are vaccinated against Covid are antivaxxed,” reported The Exposé. “And all the anti-vaxxers are NOT antivaxxed. Work that one out!”
Just as the Cleveland Clinic is releasing this damning information about the jabs, emergency ambulance services in the United Kingdom are reportedly being suspended, leaving people to die in pain without proper health care.
Much like how the relatives of sick people during covid were not allowed by the authorities to visit and provide comfort, the covid-jabbed today are suffering immune failures and finding that there is no one available to help them, leaving them to suffer and die alone in excruciating pain.
What these so-called “vaccines” are doing, we now know, is giving people vaccine-induced AIDS, or VAIDS. In the months and years to come, everyone who participated in Operation Warp Speed will learn the hard way that you can never trust Big Pharma or the government with your health, especially in the midst of a contrived “emergency” or “pandemic.”
“‘The Science’ has now been established by the Cleveland Clinic,” reports explain. “Genetic vaccines damage your immune system and make you not less likely but more likely to be infected with Covid.”
“Not only that but they have horrendous side effects on the cardiovascular, neurological and reproductive systems as well. They are nothing short of mandatory progressive euthanasia. Dr. Evil would be proud of these results.”
FWIW
Staff
From: WALTER784
Feb-23
Pfizer CEO found to be 'misleading' on vaxxing children
U.K. monitor says Bourla delivered 'unsubstantiated' information about kids' shots
By WND Staff
Published February 1, 2023 at 6:18pm
Albert Bourla, chief of the Pfizer company that has profited handsomely by selling the now-questioned COVID-19 shots, already is known for an ambush interview in which he was able to answer virtually none of the questions asked.
Those included:
"When did you know that the vaccines did not stop transmission [of COVID, as was widely claimed, including by Pfizer itself, which said they were '100 percent effective'?"
"How long did you know that without saying so publicly?"
"We now know that the vaccines didn't stop transmission, but why did you keep it secret?"
Now a report from the Epoch Times notes that a pharmaceutical watchdog in the United Kingdom has charged that he made "misleading" and unsubstantiated statements about the benefits of giving COVID-19 shots to children.
The details come from a case report published recently.
"During an interview with the BBC published on Dec. 2, 2021, Bourla was asked whether he believed it was likely that 5- to 11-year-olds in the UK and Europe would be vaccinated against COVID-19 and whether it was a good idea," the report said.
That came after the Food and Drug Administration in the U.S. allowed the use of its vaccinations for children, but the U.K.'s regulator refused to go along.
Bourla said, at that time, "I believe it’s a very good idea," citing "disruptions" in education.
"So there is no doubt in my mind about the benefits completely are in favor of doing it," he said.
WND is now on Trump's Truth Social! Follow us @WNDNews
But leaders of the UsForThem, a children's welfare campaign, filed complaints and a "panel from the Prescription Medicines Code of Practice Authority (PMCPA) ruled that Bourla’s statements breached a number of rules in the Association of the British Pharmaceutical Industry (ABPI) code of practice."
When the drug company protested, an appeal board affirmed five counts of breaking rules that "information and claims" be accurate, balanced and substantiated.
The PMCPA, the Epoch Times explained, found Bourla's comments to be of a "strong unqualified nature."
And it said the implications that there were no significant concerns about side effects to be "misleading."
The report said that was not the only questionable incident.
"Bourla was initially found to have also breached the code for promoting the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine in the 5–11 age group when it was not authorised by the MHRA, but the appeal board overturned the ruling, agreeing with Pfizer that its CEO was asked a specific question and it was not unreasonable to talk about the issue in principle," the report said.
Ben Kingsley of UsForThem told the Epoch Times he was "thrilled" with the conclusion that the comments were misleading.
WND reported earlier when Rebel News, led by Canadian conservative Ezra Levant, traveled to Davos, Switzerland, for the World Economic Forum and interviewed Bourla on the street.
Levant and Rebel News' Australian representative Avi Yemini hit the uncooperative Bourla with one tough question after another, but he answered none.
Watch the video embedded in the tweet below.
Bourla isn't the only Pfizer official in the news, either.
WND reported when a video from undercover reporters from Project Veritas revealed Jordan Trishton Walker, a research director, claimed the company is secretly exploring intentionally creating mutations of the COVID virus so that new vaccines would be needed, a "cash cow for us."
He later claimed he was lying "to a person to impress them on a date."
...[Message truncated]
Staff
From: WALTER784
Feb-23
If it cures Covid naturally... it's dangerous... per the WEF!!! Therefore, you must get the vaccine!!!
WEF promises to ban “dangerous” eggs following scientific discovery that eating them cures covid naturally
Thursday, February 09, 2023
by: Ethan Huff
(Natural News) The global “elite” are attacking eggs by calling them dangerous and deadly after it was revealed that the high-protein superfood is a natural cure for covid.
The World Economic Forum (WEF) tweeted a lie stating that eating eggs “increases the risk of heart attacks and strokes,” the suggestion being that people should stop eating them for their own safety.
We know the truth that covid “vaccines” are responsible for the sudden uptick in heart attacks and strokes being observed all around the world, but the WEF is trying to convince everyone that eggs, which are currently in short supply, are worse than crack cocaine or heroin.
Globalist-aligned “scientists” claim that eating eggs could cause blood clots leading to death – a convenient cover story for the hordes of “fully vaccinated” people who are dying every single day from the injections.
The claim is that choline, a nutrient found in eggs, somehow contributes to the alleged blood-clotting activity of this superfood. Choline consumption, we are told, is why people everywhere are dying suddenly, seemingly without cause.
They want you eating bugs and “plant-based” poisons, not healing eggs and meat
It was none other than the Cleveland Clinic, a conventional medicine hotbed of deception, that put out this new misleading research. (Related: In 2014, the Cleveland Clinic did embrace traditional Chinese medicine [TCM] as a viable medicinal protocol.)
According to the Cleveland Clinic, choline, a dietary supplement that is also deemed to be an essential nutrient, is suddenly dangerous now that covid “vaccines” have been introduced. Coincidence?
Brighteon.TV
Joe Rogan spoke about this lunatic new “study” from the Cleveland Clinic on his podcast show, revealing to his millions of followers on Instagram that choline and eggs are healthy, not harmful.
It would seem as though the WEF is attempting to kill two birds with one stone by deflecting from covid injections and placing blame for their adverse effects on eggs, which just so happen to be seeing a nationwide shortage due to “avian flu” and supply chain problems.
It only makes sense that the WEF would embrace such tactics, seeing as how its current leader, Klaus Schwab, was mentored by globalist Henry Kissinger who infamous stated that:
“Who controls the food supply controls the people; who controls the energy can control whole continents; who controls the money can control the world.”
Interestingly, the WEF tweet about the “dangers” of eating eggs came just as billionaire eugenicist Bill Gates introduced a new artificial egg concept from which he hopes to profit in the future.
“Bill Gates has a history of investing in everything that is artificial, including insect protein, Beyond Meat, and a cornucopia of vaccines,” reports Newspunch. “So it should come as no surprise that he invested in Hampton Creek, the company that is bringing artificial eggs to the mainstream.”
Hampton Creek was recently renamed Eat Just, and real eggs just so happen to have spiked in price by 66 percent this year compared to last. As a result, some consumers have already made the switch to fake eggs, which is great for Gates’ profit streams.
A number of egg farms have also exploded or caught fire in recent months – also a “coincidence,” surely.
“The elites’ carefully laid plan is playing out in front of our eyes, and it all leads towards a decreased supply of eggs and meat and an increased supply of insects and synthetic foods,” one report explains about what is currently going on in America.
“Considering the fact that humans have a natural inclination to eat nutrient-dense, natural foods, why are they insisting on forcing us to eat insects and artificial slop? Because, to the elite, bad is good.”
Eggs are healthy
...[Message truncated]
TOP