Opinion Polls: Delphi's Polling Place
Hosted by Showtalk
Opinion polls on all subjects. Opinions? Heck yes, we have opinions - but we're *always* nice about it, even when ours are diametrically opposed to yours. Register your vote today!
- 4886
MEMBERS - 119993
MESSAGES - 2
POSTS TODAY
Discussions
Should Schiff and Swalwell sit on the House Intelligence Committee? The Serious You: How Current Events Affect You
Poll Question From Showtalk
Jan-23
Should Schiff and Swalwell sit on the House Intelligence Committee?
- Yes, they were nominated and should continue on the committee3
votes
- No, McCarthy should decline to seat them10
votes
- Other0
votes
From: Showtalk
Jan-23
McCarthy: Removing Schiff and Swalwell from committee is 'what we're supposed to do'
House Speaker Kevin McCarthy said he hasn't changed his mind about his decision to remove Reps. Adam Schiff (D-CA) and Eric Swalwell (D-CA) from the House Intelligence Committee.
Read more from Washington ExaminerFrom: Showtalk
Jan-23
Schiff Refuses To Disclose Why He Withheld Details Of Swalwell's Relationship With A Chinese Spy From Intel Committee
Schiff's office did not respond when asked if he previously knew about Swalwell's involvement with Fang or if he was briefed about Swalwell's relationship with Fang.
Read more from The FederalistFrom: The_Rock (JABRONI256)
Jan-23
Voted 2, McCarthy is entirely within his purview here to keep them off committees, whether they deserve to be or not is an open question that is debatable but McCarthy said he'd do it and he apparently will so it's a done deal.
From: Showtalk
Jan-23
Swallwell had an affair with a Chinese Communist spy. Schaffer has lied for years and caused major disruptions to the House getting things done. He consorted with A Russian journalist trying to smear Trump.
From: The_Rock (JABRONI256)
Jan-24
I love how I agreed with you on the basis of your poll question and this is your response, your level of bias is unreal, even if I shared this view and perception of these events, which I don't, it's not the scope of your question, you asked if they should sit on the committees, I clearly indicated that with McCarthy's position and statements he has made that they would not. I also said it was debatable whether they should be on the committees irrespective of McCarthy's probable course of action, didn't say I wanted to debate it.
From: Showtalk
Jan-24
So I’m expected to censor myself and not comment on your post because you are annoyed that I tried to debate. That makes no sense to me.
You said “whether they deserve to be or not is an open question that is debatable”
Why use the word “debatable” if you did not want to debate it? My reply shows why it’s not a debatable point. They are not qualified. I appreciate you sided with MCarthy, which you did because it’s his right. Effectively you also shut down any further discussion.
From: WALTER784
Jan-25
Sometimes, it's best to not argue with some people and just let them be wrong. (* GRIN *)
FWIW
From: Showtalk
Jan-25
Democrats removed Green and Gosar from all committees in 2020 which is unprecedented. Now they are vocally complaining loudly about McCarthy’s decision. McCarthy gave them assignments.
https://nypost.com/2023/01/17/marjorie-taylor-greene-paul-gosar-get-committee-assignments/