You can't make this stuff up:

FWIW

They won’t be able to keep him off the ballots. It’s unconstitutional for states to decide someone can’t appear on a ballot for a presidential election.

Are there court rulings to support this, or is it your personal view?

They want to use Amendment 14 Section 3 to remove Trump from the ballot but it’s a stretch to make it fit and would trigger legal challenges. It would destroy the 2024 election because they can’t hold an election without Trump on the ballot while it’s being revised by a court or u til it’s resolved.

Fourteenth Amendment Equal Protection and Other Rights

Section 3 Disqualification from Holding Office

No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.

But the proponents of this are many and they seem serious, so I am still concerned. It is also being conducted at a state by state level increasing the chances that it would succeed in some states. He wouldn't have to be off the ballot for every state. At some point there would be a critical point where he would be off too many state ballots to wage a credible campaign. And I think that point would be fewer states rather than more.

If he’s off the ballot in any state it will damage the election, as well as the system.

Showtalk said...

They won’t be able to keep him off the ballots. It’s unconstitutional for states to decide someone can’t appear on a ballot for a presidential election.

Don't put it past them...

Need I list all the unconstitutional things they've done?

FWIW

No, I agree with you. 

This man deserves a standing applaud for putting Garland in his place. He asks quite a few questions of Garland but never gives Garland even 1 second to reply to the questions... (* ROFLMAO *) And then comes out with the answers he was looking for elsewhere putting Garland in the hot spot and unable to answer!!! 

Rep. Troy Nehls, R-Texas, questions Attorney General Merrick Garland about the Hunter Biden case.

FWIW

Jim Jordan: There’s ‘all kinds of contradictions’ in Garland’s testimony

FWIW