Opinion Polls: Delphi's Polling Place

Hosted by Showtalk

Opinion polls on all subjects. Opinions? Heck yes, we have opinions - but we're *always* nice about it, even when ours are diametrically opposed to yours. Register your vote today!

  • 4885
    MEMBERS
  • 119792
    MESSAGES
  • 70
    POSTS TODAY

Discussions

Fair Elections   The Serious You: How Current Events Affect You

Started 11/11/21 by WALTER784; 194743 views.
Msg 1649 of 2370 to Showtalkshowtalk 
In reply toRe: msg 1646
WALTER784
Staff

From: WALTER784

Nov-7

Showtalk said...

Those PA ballots need to be taken back and destroyed!

They'll remove the ballots from the envelopes and place them in the stack to be counted.

Once removed from the envelope, you cannot tell which one belongs to who.

And another thing which that story didn't mention... and that is... if you send a ballot out to someone who no longer lives at an address, it may or may not get returned as undeliverable. But my question is... did they really send these out? Or did they just print them and claim they sent them out but kept them in some storage facility and thus never sent them in the first place.

Another thing is that the initial number was 240,000... and then later that number got bumped up by another 15,000! So where did the initial 240,000 number come from and why were an additional 15,000 discovered later?

It's all fraud.

FWIW

 

 
 ReplyToggle Dropdown
Msg 1650 of 2370 to WALTER784WALTER784 
In reply toRe: msg 1649
Showtalk
Host

From: Showtalk

Nov-7

There is a lot of suspicious activity again, at the last minute. It’s disgusting.

 
 ReplyToggle Dropdown
Msg 1651 of 2370 to Showtalkshowtalk 
In reply toRe: msg 1647
WALTER784
Staff

From: WALTER784

Nov-7

Showtalk said...

The idea that we will still have large chunks of uncounted votes into Thursday and Friday should not be true unless Fetterman knows something we all don’t.

Those 255,000 ballots will show up on Thursday.

France has over 64 million people and they completed the count overnight.

Pennsylvania only has 13 million people, so why can't they also complete the count overnight?

It's to give them time to cheat and win!!!

FWIW

 
 ReplyToggle Dropdown
Msg 1652 of 2370 to Showtalkshowtalk 
In reply toRe: msg 1650
WALTER784
Staff

From: WALTER784

Nov-7

Showtalk said...

There is a lot of suspicious activity again, at the last minute. It’s disgusting.

I think people on both sides of the isle just want a fair vote and hate to see all this corruption in our voting process.

FWIW

 
 ReplyToggle Dropdown
Msg 1653 of 2370 to WALTER784WALTER784 
In reply toRe: msg 1651
Showtalk
Host

From: Showtalk

Nov-7

It’s now the law there they can’t drag it out.

 
 ReplyToggle Dropdown
Msg 1654 of 2370 to WALTER784WALTER784 
In reply toRe: msg 1652
Showtalk
Host

From: Showtalk

Nov-7

Exactly, we want it to be fair and honest.

 
 ReplyToggle Dropdown
Msg 1655 of 2370 to Showtalkshowtalk 
In reply toRe: msg 1653
WALTER784
Staff

From: WALTER784

Nov-7

Showtalk said...

It’s now the law there they can’t drag it out.

Oh, they'll come out with some strange excuse that needs to be rectified first and then delay it a day or two.

FWIW

 
 ReplyToggle Dropdown
Msg 1656 of 2370
In reply toRe: msg 1655
WALTER784
Staff

From: WALTER784

Nov-7

Elon Musk Restores Mark Finchem’s Account After Twitter Suspends Him 8 DAYS Before General Election

By Jordan Conradson
Published October 31, 2022 at 8:00pm

Twitter is playing more tricks ahead of next Tuesday’s General Election. Today, it was reported that Trump-Endorsed Arizona Secretary of State candidate Mark Finchem’s Twitter account was suspended without cause.
 
The Gateway Pundit reported that Elon Musk and Twitter reached a deal on Thursday, and Musk now owns the platform.
 
But it appears the rogue Twitter employees are still censoring conservatives in order to influence this year’s election.
 
Mark Finchem posted a screenshot from Twitter on President Trump’s TRUTH Social app that said, “after careful review, we have determined your account broke the Twitter rules.”
 
Mark Finchem said, “they are trying to put their thumb on the scales of this election” in a message to former Trump attorney Jenna Ellis.
 
Finchem sent the following message to Ellis earlier today, and Elon Musk replied, “looking into it.”
 
Kari Lake War Room shared the following message, urging voters to vote for Mark Finchem and Blake Masters to stop this election interference and hold Big Tech accountable.
 
Brick Suit also chimed in to bring attention to this issue.
 
Finchem tweeted an hour later, thanking Elon Musk and others for their support and spreading the word.
 
This is also happening to Conservative Arizona State House candidate Christian Lamar, and his account has not yet been reinstated.
 
All Arizona Patriots should tweet Elon Musk to reinstate Christian Lamar and other conservative candidates who’s elections are being targeted by Twitter.
 
It looks like Elon Musk may need to fire a few more rogue employees.

Elon Musk Restores Mark Finchem's Account After Twitter Suspends Him 8 DAYS Before General Election (thegatewaypundit.com)

FWIW

 
 ReplyToggle Dropdown
Msg 1657 of 2370
In reply toRe: msg 1656
WALTER784
Staff

From: WALTER784

Nov-8

I wonder how many of the Republicans who changed to the Democrat party are actually dead? (* GULP *)

CHANGE: Tens Of Thousands Of Pennsylvanians Are Leaving The Democrat Party, Becoming Republicans

By ProTrumpNews Staff
Published November 3, 2022 at 1:40pm

Republicans are gaining more former Democrats in Pennsylvania than Democrats are gaining former Republicans.
 
36,000 more Democrats have switched to Republicans than Republicans have switched to Democrats. Republicans have also gained 3,000 more other voters than Democrats.
 
Democrats that switched to the Republican party: 57,000
 
Republicans that switched to the Democrat party: 21,000
 
Republican other voter gains: 30,000
 
Democrat other voter gains: 27,000
 
Republicans also had more voters switch to the Republican party last year than the Democrats.
 
Center Square reported:
 
Pennsylvania’s registered voter numbers are up and Democrats hold an advantage, but Republicans are gaining former Democrats.
 
The data show that while Democrats have gained about 21,000 former Republican voters and almost 27,000 other voters, the Republicans have gained about 57,000 former Democratic voters and almost 30,000 other voters in 2022.
 
That bodes well for the Grand Old Party, continuing a long-running trend.
 
Last year, about 30,000 Republicans switched to Democrat and 14,000 other voters, compared to 37,000 Democrats switching to the Republicans along with 18,000 other voters. Republicans have gained more Democratic voters than Democrats have gained Republicans since 2008, according to the oldest data available.
 
Democrats still hold an advantage over Republicans in voter registration overall but that lead is shrinking.
 
Pennsylvania is a key state for the 2022 midterms with an important Governor and Senate race.

CHANGE: Tens Of Thousands Of Pennsylvanians Are Leaving The Democrat Party, Becoming Republicans (thegatewaypundit.com)

FWIW

  • Edited November 8, 2022 3:55 am  by  WALTER784
 
 ReplyToggle Dropdown
Msg 1658 of 2370
In reply toRe: msg 1657
WALTER784
Staff

From: WALTER784

Nov-8

It’s Not Just St. Louis – New York City Is Training Election Workers to Accept ALL SIGNATURES That Are WILDLY UNMATCHED

By Jim Hoft
Published November 5, 2022 at 8:00am

Earlier this week The Gateway Pundit reported on how St. Louis County election officials were telling poll workers during training sessions not to worry about the new Photo ID law in the state.
 
The trainers at the session told the workers not to worry about Voter ID adding, “We are not the photo police.”
 
Missouri passed Voter ID laws this past year.
 
New York City training guide says these signatures match.
 
On Friday evening another Gateway Pundit reader from New York wrote to tell us this is also happening in New York City.
 
And our friend from New York even sent screengrabs from the training.
 
Dear Jim:
 
After reading your story  “We are not the photo police” I have a related situation to report.
 
I’ve become aware of what I believe is a glaring opportunity for fraud in the New York City elections next week.
 
My husband and I have been training online as poll workers. Every lesson that deals with authenticating a voter encourages the poll worker to accept signatures that are wildly unmatched between the one “on file” and the one that the voter signs on the tablet on election day.
 
We all know that digital signing does not perfectly replicate a pen-on-paper signature, but the variations shown in the training are outrageously inaccurate. Not a single one resembles its on-file version, yet the poll worker cannot question it.
 
I saw this discrepancy immediately, but even my husband — who is not alert to visual details — was shocked when I pointed it out.
 
Interestingly, the printed manual (attached) does not contain any of these illustrations; they are only viewable in the online training modules. I’ve taken screen shots (attached) to demonstrate.
 
My husband and I were appalled that the training video does not address signature variation in any way. Any signature, no matter how flagrantly inauthentic, is passed through.
 
What the video does address are situations where a voter is not in the poll book, or where a vote has already been cast in the voter’s name, or where a voter has come to the wrong election district and refuses to go to the correct one. In those cases, the only option available is to cast an Affidavit Vote, which the training perplexedly states will not be counted.
 
It is possible, even likely, that since IDs are not required someone can easily cast a fraudulent vote in a legitimate voter’s name. Later, if the legitimate voter attempts to vote, he can only do so as an Affidavit Vote which will not be counted.
 
One might conclude that the Board of Elections is indoctrinating its poll workers to accept fraudulent voters or offer remedies that will invalidate a genuine vote.
 
If you choose to investigate this further, I will make myself available at your convenience.
 
Kind regards.
N**** ****
 
Here is another example of an approved signature.

It's Not Just St. Louis - New York City Is Training Election Workers to Accept ALL SIGNATURES That Are WILDLY UNMATCHED (thegatewaypundit.com)

FWIW

 
 ReplyToggle Dropdown
Keep Reading
TOP