Opinion Polls: Delphi's Polling Place

Hosted by Showtalk

Opinion polls on all subjects. Opinions? Heck yes, we have opinions - but we're *always* nice about it, even when ours are diametrically opposed to yours. Register your vote today!

  • 4706
    MEMBERS
  • 107198
    MESSAGES
  • 66
    POSTS TODAY

Discussions

Showtalk
Host

From: Showtalk

1/9/22

It is a problem whenever it happens, no matter who is doing it.

WALTER784

From: WALTER784

1/9/22

Showtalk said...

It is a problem whenever it happens, no matter who is doing it.

It should be a problem for both parties, but as long as it's just Democrats doing it... they're not going to say anything... however, if it were just Republicans doing it... I guarantee you that we would be having no end to all of their complaints.

But like you said, Republicans, Independents and Democrats should ALL be concerned!

It's real... it's big... and it needs to be corrected! But we're still not sure exactly how big it is. More and more is being uncovered daily.

FWIW

WALTER784

From: WALTER784

1/10/22

They lost their case against Arizona and now they're trying to do the same in Pennsylvania. If they didn't do anything wrong in the elections, then they should have no problem with whoever inspects their equipment. Dominion made the same claim that the forensics auditors were not qualified, blah blah blah... and so the forensics team specifically requested that Dominion be present and watch over their inspections, the techniques and methods used but Dominion never showed up. Dominion should only be worried if they did something illegal which they might be caught at. Otherwise, they should not attempt to get a court to stop the forensics examination. If they did nothing wrong, nothing can be found. If they're afraid that somebody might plant something in their devices, they should be right there when the machines are being inspected to confirm that nothing wrong was done! But they probably won't show up again either.

Once Again Dominion Voting Systems Attempt to Prevent An Investigation of Their Voting Machines – This Time in Pennsylvania

By Joe Hoft
Published January 5, 2022 at 7:15am
 
Dominion Voting machines continues to attempt to prevent any investigations into their voting machines used in the 2020 Election.  
 
According to CBS Pennsylvania:
 
Dominion Voting Systems has asked a court to restrict any inspection of its voting machines as part of what Republican lawmakers call a “forensic investigation” of Pennsylvania’s 2020 election to a laboratory that has specific credentials.
 
The Denver-based voting-system manufacturer filed paperwork in court Monday evening as Republican lawmakers move to inspect Dominion’s machines and software in southern Pennsylvania’s sparsely populated Fulton County using an unaccredited contractor that has no election experience.
 
In its court papers, Dominion requested an order requiring that any inspection be conducted by a federally accredited voting system test lab or a national laboratory used by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security’s Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency.
 
The problem for Dominion is that the federally “accredited” voting system test labs for years weren’t accredited when they were used as accredited test labs.  We found this in Arizona this last year.  When we pointed this out, the EAC immediately updated the two labs used in Arizona that day.   These labs self-assess anyways and no one is reviewing these assessments that we can tell.
 
The other entities that Dominion mentions, “national laboratory used by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security’s Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency” are also likely limited in nature too.
 
What it comes down to, is Dominion wants to pick who looks at their voting machines.
 
As an auditor or investigator, when someone prevents access to data requested, multiple red flags arise.  Many companies have annual code of conduct documents that all employees must sign that state that each and every employee must provide auditors the documents they ask for when they ask for them.  Going against this policy could likely lead to termination.
 
This is very concerning that Dominion won’t openly allow investigators to look into their machines.  

Once Again Dominion Voting Systems Attempt to Prevent An Investigation of Their Voting Machines - This Time in Pennsylvania (thegatewaypundit.com)

FWIW

 

Showtalk
Host

From: Showtalk

1/12/22

Doesn’t Pelosi have a monetary investment in Dominion? Or is that some other politician?

WALTER784
Staff

From: WALTER784

1/13/22

Showtalk said...

Doesn’t Pelosi have a monetary investment in Dominion? Or is that some other politician?

All of the liberal news media fact checkers adamantly claim that Pelosi doesn't have a monetary investment in Dominion so that means she does!

FWIW

Showtalk
Host

From: Showtalk

1/13/22

They are partial right. Pelosi’s Chief of Staff and Feinstein’s husband both have financial involvement with Dominion. They deny it but several people have access to the documents and proof.  They are parsing words to make it appear there is no connections, saying things like they don’t have significant ownership. What does that even mean?

Fox News's Maria Bartiromo said that she had seen reports that Blum was a "significant shareholder" in Dominion and that a former chief of staff for Nancy Pelosi is a "key executive

WALTER784
Staff

From: WALTER784

1/13/22

Showtalk said...

They are partial right. Pelosi’s Chief of Staff and Feinstein’s husband both have financial involvement with Dominion. They deny it but several people have access to the documents and proof.  They are parsing words to make it appear there is no connections, saying things like they don’t have significant ownership. What does that even mean?

Ownership is basically plausible deniability in legal terms.

They're guilty but claim otherwise. And thus require liberal fact checkers to plausibly attempt to prove otherwise.

FWIW

Showtalk
Host

From: Showtalk

1/13/22

It has the appearance of impropriety.

WALTER784
Staff

From: WALTER784

1/14/22

Why is it that dead voters, regardless of registered party (Republicans, Independents and Democrats) only vote for Democrats?

They're dead. They shouldn't be able to cast a vote. But they all vote Democrat!!!

FWIW

WALTER784
Staff

From: WALTER784

1/14/22

HUGE BREAKING NEWS: Court Rules Pennsylvania Senate’s Investigation of the 2020 Election Results in the State Will Move Forward

By Joe Hoft
 
Published January 12, 2022 at 7:00am
 
A Pennsylvania Court has ruled in the case regarding the state Senate’s investigation into the 2020 Election results in Pennsylvania.  The investigation will move forward despite RINOs, Democrats, and Dominion Voting machines protesting the effort. 
 
Per a local far-left publication – Pittsburgh’s Action News 4:
 
A Pennsylvania court declined Monday to block an entire subpoena to state election officials in what Republican state lawmakers call a “forensic investigation” of 2020’s presidential election, fueled by former President Donald Trump’s … claims that Democrats stole the election.
 
But the statewide Commonwealth Court that issued the seven-page order also did not immediately greenlight the release of some information that Democratic state Attorney General Josh Shapiro challenged as being protected by privacy laws.
 
In the unsigned order, the court said state officials did not persuade it that the subpoena issued in September by a Republican-controlled Senate committee had no legitimate legislative purpose.
 
The state, led by its corrupt AG and SoS, are trying to stop this effort from moving forward.  They attempted to ask what was the purpose of the investigation, but it is really none of their business because the Senate felt compelled to have the audit performed and have no legal obligation [that we know of] to provide the rationale for the investigation to the state’s corrupt executive groups.
 
The subpoena had requested a 17 categories of records, much of it public, but also information that the state attorney general’s office said is protected by privacy laws, namely the partial Social Security numbers and driver’s license numbers of roughly 9 million registered voters and details about election systems that is barred from public disclosure by federal law.
 
The court also declined to debate whether the subpoena was issued appropriately under internal Senate rules, saying it would leave that matter to the Senate.
 
It did not issue a hearing schedule or instructions on how it will handle the release of information potentially protected by privacy laws, including the partial Social Security and driver’s license numbers of roughly 9 million registered voters.
 
Both sides declared victory.
 
The Senate’s highest-ranking member, President Pro Tempore Jake Corman, a gubernatorial candidate trying to establish his pro-Trump credentials, said in a statement that the ruling “upholds the General Assembly’s clear legal and constitutional authority to provide oversight of our election system.”
 
Shapiro, who is also running for governor this year, said in a statement that the court recognized there are serious questions about the vendor hired by the Senate Republicans “to safeguard the private personal information of nine million Pennsylvania voters.”
 
After attempting to sidetrack the effort in Pennsylvania, the opponents of the investigation began attacking the investigators.  This is their next tactic.
 
The subpoena in Pennsylvania stopped short of requesting ballots and voting machines, as was done in Arizona, until Dush wrote last month to request the digital data from the election computers and hardware used in the 2020 election by Fulton County, a sparsely populated and heavily Republican county.
 
On Monday, Dominion Voting Systems lost a bid in court to restrict any inspection of its voting machines to a laboratory that has specific credentials, which Envoy Sage does not have.
 
Dominion Voting Machines also is attempting to insert itself into the court challenges.

HUGE BREAKING NEWS: Court Rules Pennsylvania Senate's Investigation of the 2020 Election Results in the State Will Move Forward (thegatewaypundit.com)

FWIW

TOP