Opinion Polls: Delphi's Polling Place

Hosted by Showtalk

Opinion polls on all subjects. Opinions? Heck yes, we have opinions - but we're *always* nice about it, even when ours are diametrically opposed to yours. Register your vote today!

  • 4735
    MEMBERS
  • 109827
    MESSAGES
  • 53
    POSTS TODAY

Discussions

WALTER784
Staff

From: WALTER784

1/13/22

Showtalk said...

They are partial right. Pelosi’s Chief of Staff and Feinstein’s husband both have financial involvement with Dominion. They deny it but several people have access to the documents and proof.  They are parsing words to make it appear there is no connections, saying things like they don’t have significant ownership. What does that even mean?

Ownership is basically plausible deniability in legal terms.

They're guilty but claim otherwise. And thus require liberal fact checkers to plausibly attempt to prove otherwise.

FWIW

Showtalk
Host

From: Showtalk

1/13/22

It has the appearance of impropriety.

WALTER784
Staff

From: WALTER784

1/14/22

Why is it that dead voters, regardless of registered party (Republicans, Independents and Democrats) only vote for Democrats?

They're dead. They shouldn't be able to cast a vote. But they all vote Democrat!!!

FWIW

WALTER784
Staff

From: WALTER784

1/14/22

HUGE BREAKING NEWS: Court Rules Pennsylvania Senate’s Investigation of the 2020 Election Results in the State Will Move Forward

By Joe Hoft
 
Published January 12, 2022 at 7:00am
 
A Pennsylvania Court has ruled in the case regarding the state Senate’s investigation into the 2020 Election results in Pennsylvania.  The investigation will move forward despite RINOs, Democrats, and Dominion Voting machines protesting the effort. 
 
Per a local far-left publication – Pittsburgh’s Action News 4:
 
A Pennsylvania court declined Monday to block an entire subpoena to state election officials in what Republican state lawmakers call a “forensic investigation” of 2020’s presidential election, fueled by former President Donald Trump’s … claims that Democrats stole the election.
 
But the statewide Commonwealth Court that issued the seven-page order also did not immediately greenlight the release of some information that Democratic state Attorney General Josh Shapiro challenged as being protected by privacy laws.
 
In the unsigned order, the court said state officials did not persuade it that the subpoena issued in September by a Republican-controlled Senate committee had no legitimate legislative purpose.
 
The state, led by its corrupt AG and SoS, are trying to stop this effort from moving forward.  They attempted to ask what was the purpose of the investigation, but it is really none of their business because the Senate felt compelled to have the audit performed and have no legal obligation [that we know of] to provide the rationale for the investigation to the state’s corrupt executive groups.
 
The subpoena had requested a 17 categories of records, much of it public, but also information that the state attorney general’s office said is protected by privacy laws, namely the partial Social Security numbers and driver’s license numbers of roughly 9 million registered voters and details about election systems that is barred from public disclosure by federal law.
 
The court also declined to debate whether the subpoena was issued appropriately under internal Senate rules, saying it would leave that matter to the Senate.
 
It did not issue a hearing schedule or instructions on how it will handle the release of information potentially protected by privacy laws, including the partial Social Security and driver’s license numbers of roughly 9 million registered voters.
 
Both sides declared victory.
 
The Senate’s highest-ranking member, President Pro Tempore Jake Corman, a gubernatorial candidate trying to establish his pro-Trump credentials, said in a statement that the ruling “upholds the General Assembly’s clear legal and constitutional authority to provide oversight of our election system.”
 
Shapiro, who is also running for governor this year, said in a statement that the court recognized there are serious questions about the vendor hired by the Senate Republicans “to safeguard the private personal information of nine million Pennsylvania voters.”
 
After attempting to sidetrack the effort in Pennsylvania, the opponents of the investigation began attacking the investigators.  This is their next tactic.
 
The subpoena in Pennsylvania stopped short of requesting ballots and voting machines, as was done in Arizona, until Dush wrote last month to request the digital data from the election computers and hardware used in the 2020 election by Fulton County, a sparsely populated and heavily Republican county.
 
On Monday, Dominion Voting Systems lost a bid in court to restrict any inspection of its voting machines to a laboratory that has specific credentials, which Envoy Sage does not have.
 
Dominion Voting Machines also is attempting to insert itself into the court challenges.

HUGE BREAKING NEWS: Court Rules Pennsylvania Senate's Investigation of the 2020 Election Results in the State Will Move Forward (thegatewaypundit.com)

FWIW

Showtalk
Host

From: Showtalk

1/14/22

But they said that never happens. Every time proof comes up, we are told it’s a one off and not a big deal.

WALTER784
Staff

From: WALTER784

1/14/22

Showtalk said...

But they said that never happens. Every time proof comes up, we are told it’s a one off and not a big deal.

And they've said that over 1 million times!!!

Dead voters don't vote Republican... they've always voted Democrat.

Democrats harvest dead votes, Republicans don't!

So it's a one off for the 700,000th or 1 millionth or more time!!!

Dead votes should never occur what so ever. 

Voter rolls should be purged of voters who have died! But numerous states refuse to purge them.

OK... only 23,174 in Georgia; only 14,296 in Virginia, only... ahhhh do you really want me to go through all 50 states?

One off my arse... 

FWIW

  • Edited January 14, 2022 11:00 am  by  WALTER784
WALTER784
Staff

From: WALTER784

1/15/22

Were Undocumented Ballots The Reason For Fraud at Detroit’s TCF Center?…”I literally watched thousands of unverified ballots get run through the machines”

By Patty McMurray
Published January 1, 2022 at 3:32pm
 
The Michigan Citizens for Election Integrity (MC4EI) is completing a year-long deep dive into the 2020 General Election in Detroit.
 
A 100 Percent Fed Up and Gateway Pundit Exclusive – On Thursday, in another preview of their upcoming report, TCF Timeline: the 2020 General Election in Detroit, we brought you the first of a three-part series detailing the shocking treatment of GOP challengers inside Detroit’s Absent Voter Counting Board (AVCB).
 
Members of the Democrat Party, Detroit poll workers, supervisors, and officials allegedly intimidated, removed, and obstructed GOP and non-partisan challengers and — most importantly — refused to record their challenges.
 
But why risk actions, which could amount to felonies under Michigan law?
 
Why were they so determined to shut down duly-authorized challengers? What were they trying to hide?
 
The short and most obvious answer might be “fraud.”
 
Certainly, the challengers’ affidavits are replete with allegations of every kind of fraud – from workers filling out blank ballots to tabulation of ballots from other counties. But was there a type of fraud, or more subtly, an election law violation that could protect fraud, that occurred in significant magnitude to move the needle in Michigan?
 
During the painstaking process of peeling back the onion, one layer at a time, MC4EI investigators came upon a recurring observation by the GOP and non-partisan challengers: they frequently encountered ballots of voters not found in the electronic poll book or the paper supplemental lists of late registering voters1. On the surface, this might not appear to be anything out of the ordinary. Indeed, there can be problems during a busy election, and a few voters and their ballots will occasionally “slip through the cracks” and fail to make it onto the list of eligible voters.
 
But when this problem of apparently ineligible ballots being counted is reported by large numbers of GOP and non-partisan challengers, and when the numbers of ballots involved climb into the thousands, the voting public should be concerned.
 
A recurring theme in the challengers’ accounts is that these undocumented ballots were routinely challenged by the GOP, but their challenges were not accepted – or even recorded — by poll workers or their superiors.
 
Although this was denied by top election officials who spoke to the media, the evidence is overwhelming and comes from dozens of GOP and non-partisan poll challengers. Their sworn testimony in countless affidavits proved that this was an ongoing problem on both counting days. It amounted to systematic obstruction of the challenger’s duties – duties supposedly protected by State law. 
 
To illustrate the scope of the undocumented ballots problem, here are some excerpts from MC4EI’s upcoming report, “TCF Timeline: the 2020 General Election in Detroit”:
 
November 4th – Election Day Plus One
 
10:30 AM – Non-partisan challenger Christopher Schornak (Exhibit 1, p.30) arrives at approximately 10:30 am and begins working at AVCB’s 88 and 89, where he sustains verbal abuse and intimidation by “not only the Democratic poll challengers but the ACLU and other organizations.” Mr. Schornak observes ballots that were not in the electronic poll book or the supplemental paper log. Instead of these ballots being taken out of the count and marked as a “challenged ballot,” Schornak watches as they are counted like any other ballot. [Note: Schornak would later publicly estimate that he saw over 8,000 such undocumented ballots.]
 
Watch Christopher Schornak explain what he witnessed while working as a GOP poll challenger at the TCF Center on Nov. 4:
 
2 PM – GOP challenger Dyanna Papsdorf (Exhibit 1, p.42) begins an 8-hour shift at TCF. She observes discrepancies between the numbers on the ballots and the numbers on the envelope and sees ballots entered into the system that were not listed in the electronic poll book or the supplemental paper list.
 
6:30 PM – Non-partisan challenger, affiant John McGrath is at AVCB #73, where he continues t
...[Message truncated]
View Full Message
Showtalk
Host

From: Showtalk

1/15/22

Free and fair elections. By now, no one should write about how valid the elections were. Clearly they were not. But it’s been done before and it is behind us.  Changes must be implemented for 2022 and 2024.  If Democrats can still win, then they have earned those jobs.

WALTER784
Staff

From: WALTER784

1/16/22

Showtalk said...

Free and fair elections. By now, no one should write about how valid the elections were.  Clearly they were not.

Yes...

Showtalk said...

But it’s been done before and it is behind us.

Nope... it won't be behind us until all the loopholes used in the unfair election process have been plugged! So that is NOT YET behind us.

Showtalk said...

Changes must be implemented for 2022 and 2024.

Absolutely, otherwise, our country is history.

Showtalk said...

If Democrats can still win, then they have earned those jobs.

Nope... there is no way they can win unless they steel them. At least not for the next 8 years.

FWIW

WALTER784
Staff

From: WALTER784

1/16/22

New York City Sued for Giving Voting Rights to Nearly 1M Foreign Nationals

The New York State Republican Party, naturalized American citizens, and a Democrat city councilman have filed a lawsuit against New York City Mayor Eric Adams (D) over a new policy that gives voting rights to nearly a million foreign nationals.
 
As Breitbart News has chronicled, Democrats on the 51-member New York City Council approved a plan last month that allows more than 800,000 foreign nationals with green cards, visas, and work permits the opportunity to vote in citywide elections so long as they have resided in the city for at least 30 consecutive days.
 
Adams approved the plan this week, allowing it to become New York City policy.
 
Now, the New York State Republican Party and others have filed a lawsuit to prevent the policy from going into effect, arguing that the state’s constitution makes it explicitly clear that voting rights are reserved only for American citizens and not foreign nationals.
 
“We vowed to use every legal tool in our arsenal to block this unconstitutional and un-American law, and that’s exactly what we’re doing,” New York Republican Chairman Nick Langworthy said in a statement:
 
The law is clear and the ethics are even clearer: We shouldn’t be allowing citizens of other nations to vote in our elections, full stop. We are only two weeks into the Adams administration and he is already kowtowing to the radical City Council. This lawsuit is the only thing that will stop them from their ultimate goal of eradicating all the lines between citizens and non-citizens. [Emphasis added]
 
Likewise, Staten Island Borough President Vito Fossella said, “the right to vote is one of our most sacred privileges and obligations” as American citizens.
 
“Allowing 800,000 non-citizens, including those who have been here for less than thirty days, to vote in local elections is a slap in the face of every single American citizen, whether born or naturalized,” Fossella said. “This unconstitutional act cheapens what it means to be a citizen and is an insult to every immigrant who has followed the law, taken citizenship classes, and swore an oath to our nation.”

NYC Sued for Giving Voting Rights to Nearly 1M Foreign Nationals (breitbart.com)

FWIW

TOP