Opinion Polls: Delphi's Polling Place

Hosted by Showtalk

Opinion polls on all subjects. Opinions? Heck yes, we have opinions - but we're *always* nice about it, even when ours are diametrically opposed to yours. Register your vote today!

  • 5002
    MEMBERS
  • 130163
    MESSAGES
  • 1
    POSTS TODAY

Discussions

Democrat party and what it stands for...   The Serious You: How Current Events Affect You

Started 7/9/22 by WALTER784; 77086 views.
Msg 468 of 956 to Showtalkshowtalk 
In reply toRe: msg 467
WALTER784
Staff

From: WALTER784

3/3/23

Not to discredit the actual racial discrimination that occurred between 1870 and 1940, but this sounds like race baiting and will only stir up more racial tensions between the black and white people who live in America today under the auspices of racial equity. 

But first of all, they need to get their facts straight.

Showtalk said...

There is no comprehensive record of the seizure of Black-owned property during the nearly 100 massacres executed by white supremacists nationwide between 1870 and 1940. While the intent of the racist mobs was often publicized, deeds of record and property valuations for the homes and businesses of legions of Black families frequently were destroyed, and the injured and dead were never officially tallied.

When a white mob descended upon a Black neighborhood in 1921 in Tulsa, Okla., 300 people were murdered and 10,000 Black residents were left homeless. Sometimes properties taken were disguised as “voluntary sales” in public registers. This is what happened in 1920, in Ocoee, Fla., after a white mob, enraged by Black people attempting to vote, attacked them.

Note: The first paragraph specifically state there is no comprehensive record, then it goes on to say 100 massacres nationwide between 1870 and 1940. Then, the next paragraph says 300 people were murdered in Tulsa alone in 1921.

Well, let's see, 100 were massacred between 1870 and 1940. And 1921 is between 1870 and 1940 where 300 were murdered. Isn't murdering 300 people counted as a massacre? Then why do they quote 100 massacred nationwide when there were 300 in Tulsa alone? Their facts seem to contradict themselves. And, as it started out... "there is no comprehensive record", so where did these 100 massacres nationwide and 300 murders in Tulsa alone come from? Sounds like they're going to have a hard time proving much of anything.

On another note, what about my repayment from the Germans because Hitler forced my German grandfather to work in a shoe factory for Hitler's soldiers for almost no pay? And what about my repayment from the Confederacy because they burned down the home of a relative of mine 5 generations ago in Hampton, South Carolina during the Civil War? And... well, I think you're getting the point.

I was not forced by Hitler to work in his shoe factory? I didn't live in the house that got burned down during the Civil War. Etc. And there are probably hundreds of thousands if not millions of cases similar.

If anything becomes of this, it will be the lawyers who make the most of it. Therefore, should they decide to move forward, ENSURE that only black lawyers are used as the white lawyers shouldn't benefit even a penny from any settlements, should they come about!!! 

FWIW

 
 ReplyToggle Dropdown
Msg 469 of 956 to WALTER784WALTER784 
In reply toRe: msg 468
Showtalk
Host

From: Showtalk

3/4/23

Lawyers always come out the best because they have multiple plaintiffs or multiple trials.  
 

Something else that came out is that white supremacy isn’t always right wing. One of the worst anti Black shootings was from an extreme left winger.

 
 ReplyToggle Dropdown
Msg 470 of 956 to Showtalkshowtalk 
In reply toRe: msg 469
WALTER784
Staff

From: WALTER784

3/4/23

Still... as this is for supposedly, previously suppressed black peoples, white lawyers shouldn't be allowed to profit on any court winnings. Legally, white lawyers would have a hard time proving their client's innocence in a crime they didn't commit when the lawyer would take 65% or more of the reparations! </sarcasm off>

That said: Should a white lawyer be allowed to represent a black eligible person; the white lawyer should not be able to make more than 5% of the final winnings in court! To be fair to the blacks of course.

FWIW 

 

 
 ReplyToggle Dropdown
Msg 471 of 956
In reply toRe: msg 470
WALTER784
Staff

From: WALTER784

3/5/23

‘Queer’ Whistleblower Exposes Evils Of The School-To-Scalpel Pipeline

BY: IAN PRIOR
FEBRUARY 15, 2023

Schools have become a pipeline for a dangerous transgender ideology that is gruesomely taking advantage of children and their parents.
 
Last week, a whistleblower came forward in The Free Press to expose how the Washington University Transgender Center at St. Louis Children’s Hospital engages in experimental interventions (aka “gender-affirming care”) on children that are “permanently harming the vulnerable patients in [their] care.”
 
The stories Jamie Reed outlines are horrific. Young girls were given testosterone, with gruesome side effects. Mentally ill individuals were chemically castrated with virtually no attempt to find another alternative. Parents were kept out of the loop, and people permanently altered their bodies as children, only to regret the decision shortly after. For the majority of these individuals, it is already too late.
 
Many of us have heard these stories before and have been desperately trying to get people to pay attention. Calling out the transgender agenda for what it truly is, an experiment on our nation’s children, of course, comes with backlash from trigger-happy leftists who deem this language “hateful,” “transphobic,” or “anti-LGBT.” For conservatives, that reality is something we have learned to live with.
 
The risk for the whistleblower was far greater. Reed describes herself as “a queer woman, and politically to the left of Bernie Sanders” and is “married to a transman.” Her social and political circles are undoubtedly populated by people of similar viewpoints who are likely very supportive of so-called “gender-affirming care.”
 
This background is important — to come out as she did and to expose the horrors she witnessed at the St. Louis Children’s Hospital will almost certainly earn her a scarlet letter from her social and professional circle. She will likely face the realities of unemployment and social humiliation for standing up for the truth. She already knows the risks yet also knew that standing up on this issue was far more important.
 
Not only is this incredibly courageous, but it should be a message to others on the left who listen to the antics of glory seekers like Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y., and her ilk, who have blamed the pushback for these practices on the “radical right.”
 
The whistleblower’s story is gut-wrenching in and of itself, but it reveals the endgame of drugs and surgery to chemically castrate and irreversibly damage children physically and mentally. That endgame does not happen in isolation.
 
It begins at school.
 
Schools Indoctrinate Early
 
In the early years of children’s K-12 education, they get to read books like “It Feels So Good to Be Yourself,” an illustrated book for ages 4-8 that encourages kids to question their sex at any age. One example in the book is Ruthie, a biological boy who tells his parents that the doctors got it wrong, and he is now a girl. Ruthie is 5 years old.
 
As children get older and enter puberty, the books encouraging this only grow more plentiful. Students will often see titles such as “Beyond Magenta: Transgender and Nonbinary Teens Speak Out” prominently displayed in their school libraries. 
 
Meanwhile, school policies are changed to allow students to use the bathrooms and locker rooms of the sex with which they “identify,” to compete in sex-segregated athletic events pursuant to the sex with which they “identify,” and to be referred to by the “pronouns” they desire, regardless of whether other students and teachers have religious or moral objections.
 
Students who “identify” as a different sex are effectively given rights above and beyond everyone else. It’s no wonder young adolescents would deal with their growing pains in a way that gives them a feeling of acceptance, validation, and being part of a new “civil right.” In other words, a social contagion takes root.
 
Children are especially vulnerable to this phenomenon. When this was highlighted in Abigail Shrier’s book “Irreversible Damage,” the transgender lobby went on the attack, and her book was pulled from the shelves of Target. Those who dare suggest a social contagion is at play will be met with articles from corporate media citing so-called “experts” denying its existence. But now even a far-left whistleblower tells us of
...[Message truncated]
View Full Message
 
 ReplyToggle Dropdown
Msg 472 of 956
In reply toRe: msg 471
WALTER784
Staff

From: WALTER784

3/5/23

By Forcing Americans Into Electric Vehicles, Leftists Ensure Road Trips’ Demise

BY: VICTORIA MARSHALL
FEBRUARY 14, 2023

An Axios article titled ‘Electric car road trips are perfectly doable — if you plan ahead’ is a prime example of leftists celebrating their own ignorance.
 
Deep within a southeastern cove of Brooklyn lies Dead Horse Bay. Vintage debris washes up on its shores thanks to a decomposing underwater landfill. Old Clorox bottles, tires, men’s work boots, and shards of broken glass toss back and forth on the tide, continually churned together with old horse bones.
 
The bones come from an 1850s-era factory that used the carcasses of dead horses to make glue, fertilizer, and other materials near the bay. That such a factory was necessary — and that thousands of old horse bones line a small bay in Brooklyn — point to the fact that horses were a way of life in New York City before cars replaced them. Nearly 200,000 horses lived on the small island of Manhattan at the end of the 19th century, meaning piles of dead horse carcasses and giant mounds of manure were a daily occurrence for city residents at that time.
 
Note that the average horse produces around 30 pounds of manure a day. If you do some back-of-the-envelope math, that means New Yorkers literally put up with dumping more than 1 million tons of excrement on their streets every year to preserve their freedom of mobility.
 
That’s what climate activists and their allies in the corporate press don’t seem to get. As leftists push Americans to make the cumbersome and extremely expensive switch to electric vehicles, they forget that Americans already can go wherever they want, whenever they want, thanks to gas-powered cars. Why would they give that up and pay more in the process?
 
An Axios article titled “Electric car road trips are perfectly doable — if you plan ahead” is a prime example of leftist tone-deafness. To get more Americans to go electric, an Axios journalist went on a road trip to show readers how, erm, easy it is to embark on the great American road trip with an EV.
 
Yet, the globetrotter admits, the trip was “not without its challenges.” This includes dealing with “glitchy charging equipment touchscreens, billing questions and inoperable plugs” as well as “juggling route-planning apps and billing accounts with various charging companies.” Not to mention having to wait roughly an hour each time your EV has to charge, depending on the quality of the charger. For seasoned road-trippers, for whom time is of the essence, this is an immediate turnoff.
 
While the article aimed to persuade readers to go electric, it had the exact opposite effect. For the average American, the car symbolizes freedom, autonomy, and adventure. The open road is there to be explored, with a low barrier to entry thanks to the prevalence of gas-powered cars. Americans can go just about anywhere, as long as the keys are in the ignition and there’s gas in the tank.
 
But going electric kills the romanticism of the road trip by stripping its simplicity. When you own an EV, you can’t just get in your car and drive. You have to plan your route around EV charging stations, worry about the logistics of driving an EV (Muller’s husband drove 151 miles through the Michigan cold without heat to avoid stressing the car’s battery), and pray to God that your battery lasts between charges. The barrier to exploring the open road with an EV is much higher than with the typical gas-powered car, and Americans don’t want to deal with it. They shouldn’t have to, either.
 
This is why electric cars make up only 5 percent of new car sales and despite years of massive government subsidization still comprise just 1 percent of all cars on the road. It’s a hassle to own an electric car.
 
It’s also extremely expensive. EVs typically average $20,000 more to purchase than a gas-powered car, meaning only the upper-middle class and up can afford such a splurge. And for what? Sleek design and shiny new controls? You’re definitely not choosing an EV for your cross-country road trip from Boston to Los Angeles. It’s just not practical.
 
That’s why most Americans aren’t interested in making the switch to electric. And that is why California is banning the sale of new gas-powered cars by 2035 to force its residents to go electric. This misguided policy fails to take into account the circumstances in which EVs aren’t a “greener” choice than gas-powered vehicles and the carbon-intensive process of mass-producing new EVs creates all-new environmental problems that regular cars don’t have. 
 
This will inevitably bite Californ
...[Message truncated]
View Full Message
 
 ReplyToggle Dropdown
Msg 474 of 956 to WALTER784WALTER784 
In reply toRe: msg 472
Showtalk
Host

From: Showtalk

3/5/23

That may change when people finally realize EVs are not the only solution.

 
 ReplyToggle Dropdown
Msg 475 of 956 to Showtalkshowtalk 
In reply toRe: msg 474
WALTER784
Staff

From: WALTER784

3/6/23

Showtalk said...

That may change when people finally realize EVs are not the only solution.

Correction:

That may change when people finally realize EVs are not the only solution.

FWIW

 
 ReplyToggle Dropdown
Msg 476 of 956 to WALTER784WALTER784 
In reply toRe: msg 475
Showtalk
Host

From: Showtalk

3/6/23

I heard some leftist saying we aren’t using too many rare mineral in making EVs, yet the evidence was right in front of him. He is a tech expert and should know better. It astounds me that scientific people can be willfully ignorant when they want to be.

 
 ReplyToggle Dropdown
Msg 477 of 956 to WALTER784WALTER784 
In reply toRe: msg 406
samuelofisrael (8320john1)

From: samuelofisrael (8320john1)

3/6/23

What about schools in your home country of Japan? How are they doing in 2023? I presume you have lived, married, raised children in Japan you must have a sure grip on the educational values of their system. Have they separated 'church' and state? I believe you have lived, worked and now retired in Nippon never again to return to the USA on a full time basis? how do you maintain your American citizenship after so many decades in Japan?  

 
 ReplyToggle Dropdown
Keep Reading
TOP