Opinion Polls: Delphi's Polling Place

Hosted by Showtalk

Opinion polls on all subjects. Opinions? Heck yes, we have opinions - but we're *always* nice about it, even when ours are diametrically opposed to yours. Register your vote today!

  • 5087
  • 133056
  • 0


In light of recent info are vaccines ...   The Healthy You: Health and Fitness Polls

Started 10/24/22 by WALTER784; 84768 views.

From: WALTER784 


Showtalk said...

Sorry but Mikovits is totally unbelievable.

Try to find 2018 ~ 2022 cancer cases on the internet.

I just did a wide search myself, but for anything after 2020, it's all predictions, calculations, expected numbers, etc. There are no actual numbers:

Projected cancer cases and deaths in 2022

The most recent year for which incidence and mortality data are available lags 2 to 4 years behind the current year because of the time required for data collection, compilation, quality control, and dissemination. Therefore, we project the numbers of new cancer cases and deaths in the United States in 2022 to estimate the contemporary cancer burden. These estimates do not reflect the impact of COVID-19 because they are based on currently available incidence and mortality data through 2018 and 2019, respectively. In addition, basal cell and squamous cell skin cancers cannot be estimated because diagnoses are not recorded by most cancer registries.

The methodology for calculating contemporary cancer cases and deaths was updated in 2021 to take advantage of advances in statistical modeling and improved cancer registration coverage and is described in detail elsewhere.2021 Briefly, the first step in calculating the number of invasive cancer cases in 2022 was to estimate complete counts for every state from 2004 through 2018 using delay-adjusted, high-quality incidence data from 50 states and the District of Columbia (98% population coverage; data were unavailable for a few sporadic years for a limited number of states). A generalized linear mixed model20 was used that accounted for state-level variations in sociodemographic and lifestyle factors, medical settings, and cancer screening behaviors.22 Then, modeled state and national counts were projected forward to 2022 using a novel, data-driven joinpoint algorithm.21

New cases of ductal carcinoma in situ of the female breast and in situ melanoma of the skin diagnosed in 2022 were estimated by first approximating the number of cases occurring annually from 2009 through 2018 based on age-specific NAACCR incidence rates (data from 49 states with high-quality data available for all 10 years)
...[Message truncated]
View Full Message
In reply toRe: msg 11

From: WALTER784 


Harvard study concludes covid jabs are more dangerous than covid itself

Thursday, September 22, 2022
by: Ethan Huff

(Natural News) Could it be that covid “vaccines” are the real death sentence, and not “covid” itself? New research out of Harvard University suggests exactly that.
The paper, which was compiled by researchers from both Harvard and Johns Hopkins University (JHU), states that covid injections are up to 98 times worse than the alleged disease they supposedly fight. (Related: Dr. Martin Kulldorff, also of Harvard, says that what has happened in the aftermath of covid proves that the current system of science and public health is “broken”.)
With that in mind, how can the Biden regime, in partnership with Big Pharma, continue to push them, including the all-new “bivalent booster” shots that are marketed as the cure for the Omicron variant, an anagram for the Moronic variant when unscrambled.
According to reports, these bivalent booster shots have never been tested on human beings. The only thing they have been tested on was a group of eight mice, which Tony Fauci and Rochelle Walensky say is fully acceptable and in line with “science.”
“It hasn’t been proven in a clinical trial, because we don’t have time to do a clinical trial because we need to get the vaccine out now because we have such a situation throughout the world and certainly in the United States, we’re having 400 deaths per day and up to 5,000 hospitalizations a day,” Fauci recently stated in an interview.
In Walensky’s words, there was simply no time to waste testing the bivalent boosters on humans because they need to get out there quickly before they become “outdated” by the introduction of the next variant or subvariant of Chinese Germs.
Natural immunity is the best cure for “covid”
If people would just leave their natural immune system alone, according to the study, then they would not have to worry about catching “covid.” The injection, by all appearances, is the disease.
“Using CDC and sponsor-reported adverse event data, we find that booster mandates may cause a net expected harm: per COVID-19 hospitalisation prevented in previously uninfected young adults, we anticipate 18 to 98 serious adverse events, including 1.7 to 3.0 booster-associated myocarditis cases in males, and 1,373 to 3,234 cases of grade ?3 reactogenicity which interferes with daily activities,” the study explains.
Most of America seems to have no idea about any of this because the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), under Walensky’s watch, has been lying from the very beginning.
Only recently did Walensky finally concede that there is, in fact, a causal relationship between the mRNA (messenger RNA) jabs and myocarditis, a type of heart inflammation that is spreading particularly among young people who got jabbed.
In a letter she wrote to Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wisc.), Walensky tried to claim that the CDC has always been honest and “consistently performs extensive data collection and analysis to detect potential adverse events and safety signals and then communicates this information to the public.”
“For example,” she wrote, “VAERS staff conducted assessments showing that causal associations exist between thrombosis with thrombocytopenia syndrome and Janssen’s COVID-19 vaccine and between myocarditis and mRNA COVID-19 vaccination.”
In that same letter, Walensky said the CDC never analyzed certain types of adverse event reports throughout the entirety of 2021, presumably because they would have been damning against the injections, which were rushed out the door at warp speed by the Trump administration.
“Everything is broken, including critical thinking, truth, freedom of speech, honest debate, and the entire medical community,” wrote an insightful commenter at Natural News. “Science. Everything. Welcome to the dark ages.”

Harvard study concludes covid jabs are more dangerous than covid itself – NaturalNews.com


In reply toRe: msg 12

From: WALTER784 


UK Gov. data proves COVID Vaccine is to blame for 25k excess deaths & counting since April; as England suffers yet another record-breaking week of Deaths

SEPTEMBER 23, 2022

The UK Government institution known as the Office for National Statistics (ONS) has confirmed that England and Wales have recorded another record-breaking week of excess deaths against the five-year-average, bringing the total to just under 25,000 since the end of April 2022.
However, this number would be far higher if it were not for the fact that the ONS now include the deaths for 2021 in the five-year average. A year that also saw significant excess deaths week on week that could not be attributed to Covid-19.
With further ONS figures proving 1 in every 73 Covid-19 vaccinated people were dead by the end of May 2022, mortality rates per 100,000 are highest among the Covid-19 vaccinated in every single age group, and it takes approximately five months following vaccination for that elevated mortality rate to be realised, it appears Covid-19 vaccination may be to blame.
Let’s not lose touch…Your Government and Big Tech are actively trying to censor the information reported by The Exposé to serve their own needs. Subscribe now to make sure you receive the latest uncensored news in your inbox…
The Covid-19 vaccination campaign has been an unmitigated disaster.
On the 6th July, the ONS published a dataset containing a whole host of horrifying data on deaths by vaccination status in England between 1st Jan 2021 and 31st May 2022.
According to the Office for National Statistics between 1st Jan 21 and 31st May 22, a total of 41,117 people died with Covid-19 following Covid-19 vaccination, and a total of 565,420 people died of any other cause following Covid-19 vaccination. This means that in all, 606,537 people sadly died by 31st May 2022 following Covid-19 vaccination.
According to the UK Health Security Agency, in England, by July 3rd 2022, 44.5 million people had received at least one dose of a Covid-19 vaccine.
This means 1 in every 73 Covid-19 vaccinated people in England were sadly dead by the end of May 2022.
Of course, some of these deaths can be attributed to other causes and would have most likely occurred anyway, but the figures are representative of a real serious problem.
We know this thanks to further data from the Office for National Statistics confirming the unvaccinated population in England has the lowest mortality rate per 100,000 population in all age groups.
The following chart shows the monthly age-standardised mortality rates by vaccination status among each age group for Non-Covid-19 deaths in England between January and May 2022, using the figures contained in table 2 of the recently published dataset collated by the UK Government agency, the Office for National Statistics –
These are age-standardised figures. There is no other conclusion that can be found for the fact mortality rates per 100,000 are the lowest among the unvaccinated other than that the Covid-19 injections are killing people.
A more detailed analaysis of the above mortality rates which can be viewed here, shows that it has taken approximately 5 months for the elevated mortality rate per 100,000 to be realised among the triple vaccinated since the mass winter booster campaign at the end of 2021.
We also saw the same pattern occur in 2021 approximately five months after the first and second dose were offered to each age group across England.
The first Covid-19 injection was administered in England on 8th December 2020, and here are the figures on mortality rates by vaccination status in the following 4 months provided by the Office for National Statistics –
The unvaccinated were substantially more likely to die of any cause other than Covid-19 than the vaccinated population in both January and February 2021, before the rates seemed to normalise by the end of April.
But look at what happened from May 2021 onwards –
All of a sudden, the vaccinated population as a whole were more likely to die
...[Message truncated]
View Full Message
In reply toRe: msg 13

From: WALTER784 


Actor Tim Robbins Just Admitted The Truth About ‘Safe And Effective’ Covid Vaccines: ‘I Bought Into It. I Demonized People. I Was Guilty Of Everything That I Came To Understand Was Not Healthy’

By Alicia Powe
Published October 27, 2022 at 9:18pm

Oscar-winning actor Tim Robbins admits that he “regrets” falling for the lies pushed by the government and corporate press, surrounding discriminatory Covid measures and Covid vaccines that “do not prevent an individual from contracting or transmitting Covid-19.”
In an interview with investigative reporter Matt Taibbi, Robbins said he initially believed the safe and effective propaganda about Covid at the start of the pandemic, but ultimately realized it was all predicated on lies.
“I totally understood it in the first year. I was compliant with everything. I locked down, I isolated, I was away from people for seven months. I bought into it. I demonized people. I was guilty of everything that I came to understand was not healthy,” Robbins admitted.
When lockdown restrictions suddenly waned during Black Lives Matter protests in 2020, Robbins began to realize Covid was about instituting a political agenda.
“I was angry at people that weren’t wearing masks, and protesting about it in Orange County,” he said. “Yet, a month later I was protesting for BLM in the streets with a mask on. A week after that, I kind of had to do a self-check on that. I knew there was a little bit of hypocrisy going on there
“I had a really good friend that died from it early on. I was angry. I was fearful, and I did everything I could to help stop the spread, but also I kept my eyes open and at my age, I think one of the most important things that I’ve been able to do is understand that I’m not right all the time, and I have to check myself and see where the hypocrisy lay. So I started having more questions.”
Inmates suddenly being released from prison during the pandemic also prompted Robbins, leader of The Actors’ Gang theater company, to further question the illogical narrative propagated by the Covid enterprise.
“It provided us an opportunity to hire more returning citizens, the ones that had done their time and were being paroled, which was another bizarre thing — you had guys that were in jail for 30 years that got out right during Covid, and went right back into isolation,” he said. “Isn’t that insane?”
Robbins railed against discriminatory Covid measures that only permitted the vaccinated entry
We were capable of opening [the theater] last September, but there were still all of these restrictions. I had a problem with this idea of having a litmus test at the door for entry:
I understood the health concerns, but I also understand that theater is a forum and it has to be open to everybody. If you start specifying reasons why people can’t be in a theater, I don’t think it’s a theater anymore. Not in the tradition of what it has always been historically, which is a forum where stories are told and disparate elements come together and figure it out.”
That’s what it’s been for. People figure out their relationship with the gods, with society, with each other. But at the door, you don’t say you can’t come in, because you haven’t done this or that. I had a problem with that. So I waited until everyone could be allowed in the theater. We opened up with a show called Can’t Pay Don’t Pay in April last year.”
But the most challenging thing has been dealing with the actors themselves, because there is this skittishness and fear, and it’s still in people. Unlike England — I was lucky enough to spend a lot of time last year in London, and they got back a lot sooner than we did. There was an attitude there, it’s that “keep calm and carry on” thing. You know, we got bombed last night, but we’re getting up today. When they reopened their theaters, they reopened them for everybody. They never excluded anybody. And when they got back to it, their West End was thriving, and continues to thrive today.
Maybe the reason we have problems is that some people are still skittish about being in a crowd with other people, but it could also be that maybe 30 to 40% of theater audiences were told they weren’t welcome. And maybe there’s something in that: when you’re told you’re not welcome, you might not necessarily want to go back.
It’s clear the pandemic is being exploited to marginalize t
...[Message truncated]
View Full Message
In reply toRe: msg 14

From: WALTER784 


Alberta cabinet minister admits COVID-19 policies were about “political control and power” and not based on science

Monday, September 26, 2022
by: Arsenio Toledo

(Natural News) A cabinet minister for the Canadian province of Alberta has admitted that the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic lockdowns and vaccine mandates were never based on science, but rather were focused on centralizing “political control and power.”
“It was never about science but about political control and power,” tweeted Alberta’s Minister of Labor and Immigration Kelechi “Kaycee” Madu, a member of the ruling United Conservative Party (UCP).
Madu was reacting to a tweet by CTV News announcing the end of the federal COVID-19 vaccine mandate for people entering Canada by the end of September. (Related: COVID-19 vaccines are killing shocking numbers of doctors in Canada.)
His comment predictably received massive backlash. The Alberta New Democratic Party (NDP), the province’s leading left-wing opposition group, called on Premier Jason Kenney to remove Madu from his cabinet.
“Frankly, it’s a new low for this minister,” claimed provincial lawmaker Irfan Sabir, a member of the Alberta NDP. “These comments are way over the line. They’re disrespectful to many, many Albertans who fell sick, who lost loved ones, who lost jobs and businesses.”
Madu thanked people who stood up to “tyrannical” COVID policies
In addition to criticizing COVID-19 lockdowns and vaccine mandates, Madu also thanked Freedom Convoy protesters and other demonstrators “who had the courage to mobilize against these tyrannical policies.”
“They endured a lot of hate, name-calling, suffered and vilified on behalf of all of us,” wrote Madu. “I thank them!”
These comments in support of the health freedom protests similarly received strong criticisms. Duane Bratt, a political scientist from Mount Royal University, claimed that Madu’s comments are hypocritical because he served in the cabinet of Kenney, who imposed vaccine mandates and lengthy lockdowns on Albertans.
“Did he support provincial COVID restrictions? Or were provincial COVID restrictions about science and not political control? After all, he was a member of that cabinet. He’s still a member of that cabinet,” said Bratt.
Bratt went further to suggest that Madu, who he called a “lightning rod” for controversy since his election in 2019, could lose his seat in the next election. He even suggested that Madu could cost the UCP other seats in Edmonton, the major urban center of Alberta and where 27 of the provincial Legislative assembly’s 87 seats are elected. The UCP currently holds seven of the 27 seats in Edmonton.
“He is not going to win his seat in Edmonton. The UCP is not going to win a seat in Edmonton,” claimed Bratt.
Lori Williams, another Mount Royal political scientist, agrees with Bratt. “This is a very extreme position for Kaycee Madu to be taking and one that could jeopardize the future electoral fortunes of the UCP,” she claimed.
Kenney has so far declined to comment on Madu’s criticism of COVID-19 policies and gratitude to health freedom protesters, telling local media that he doesn’t monitor the lawmaker’s Twitter account.
“If you want to hear Minister Madu’s views, or clarification from him, I suggest you talk to him,” he said.
Learn more about how nations like Canada handled the COVID-19 pandemic at Pandemic.news.
Watch this clip and learn how the leading cause of death in Alberta is listed as “unknown.”

Alberta cabinet minister admits COVID-19 policies were about “political control and power” and not based on science – NaturalNews.com


In reply toRe: msg 15

From: WALTER784 


Global survey: Unvaxxed avoided COVID-19 vaccine fallout, but fell victim to government tyranny

By Ramon Tomey

A global survey found that those who did not get injected with the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) vaccine did not suffer from infection, but from government tyranny.
The results of the aforementioned survey were published on Aug. 12, 2022 in the International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice and Research. It polled almost 18,500 unvaccinated people worldwide between September 2021 and February 2022, with the largest number of respondents coming from Europe, North America and Australasia. The poll asked questions about the respondents’ health during the period, with the participants sending their answers on a monthly basis.
The greatest incidence of COVID-19 disease was reported in the cohort aged between 50 and 69, with the highest rate of 12.3 percent in January. Interestingly, those 70 years old and up were least affected by COVID-19 at 1.3 percent. The 20- to 40-year-old cohort had 10.7 percent incidence rate, while those aged between one and 19 years old only registered a 3.8 percent rating.
Ten percent of the respondents infected with COVID-19 were asymptomatic, while the remaining 90 percent showed symptoms of sickness. Of the symptomatic cohort, 57 percent had mild symptoms and 35 percent had moderate symptoms. Only eight percent showed severe symptoms.
Most symptoms reported by the respondents who got sick with COVID-19 included tiredness, cough, aches, fever, loss of taste and/or smell, difficulty breathing and diarrhea.
Just 0.4 percent of the respondents said they were hospitalized as either in-patients or out-patients. Of the respondents hospitalized for COVID-19, 20 percent did not need to stay overnight; 55 percent where hospitalized for less than three days; and 28 percent were confined for two weeks or more. (Related: Study: Unvaccinated individuals are not a burden to medical systems.)
Unvaxxed suffered more from discrimination than infection
The survey’s findings insinuated that the unvaccinated respondents, by virtue of their natural immunity, were minimally impacted by COVID-19. Tyranny and discrimination due to their vaccination status left more serious damages.
Terminations due to noncompliance with COVID-19 vaccine mandates were greatest in Australia and New Zealand at 29 percent, followed by 13 percent in North America, which includes the United States and Canada.
Between 20 and 50 percent of respondents worldwide reported being personal targets of hate because of their vaccination status. Almost 45 percent reported “moderate” to “severe” mental health issues arising from discrimination over their health choices.
Moreover, between 57 and 61 percent of respondents based in Southern Europe, Western Europe, Australia, New Zealand and South America reported being victimized by their own governments.
The respondents also elaborated on their reasons for refusing the COVID-19 shot. They cited preference for natural medicine, distrust of Big Pharma, distrust of government information, poor or limited clinical trial data for the shots and fear of long-term adverse reactions.
Almost two-thirds of respondents – 71 percent – reported taking supplements such as vitamin D, vitamin C, zinc and quercetin alongside antivirals like ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine (HCQ). There was a substantial bias toward hospitalization for survey participants who did not take these supplements.
“The findings suggest that opting out of the world’s largest medical experiment, relying on natural immunity, self-care with supplements and/or ivermectin or HCQ, appeared to contribute to low incidences of severe disease, hospitalization or death,” the researchers concluded.
“Public dialogue about the touted ‘safety and effectiveness’ of vaccines, contrasted with strategies to enhance immune resilience, all in the context of authoritarianism versus autonomy, self-care, personal responsibility and freedom of choice is needed.”
MedicalFascism.news has more stories about the discrimination experienced by the unvaccinated.
Watch this fighter pilot testify about the discrimination faced by unvaccinated service members in the U.S. military.

Global survey: Unvaxxed avoided COVID-19 vaccine fallout,
...[Message truncated]
View Full Message
In reply toRe: msg 16

From: WALTER784 


European children suffer appalling 755% increase in excess death after COVID VACCINE approval

Tuesday, September 27, 2022
by: Lance D Johnson

(Natural News) In May of 2021, the European Medicines Agency (EMA) extended emergency use authorization for the Pfizer covid-19 vaccine for children ages 12 to 15. It didn’t take long for European governments to push the vaccine onto children as young as five.
By August 30, 2022, European children had suffered through an appalling 755 percent increase in excess death. This excess in childhood mortality was not observed in 2020, during a time when governments and school systems sought to inundate children with fear, lockdowns, social isolation and forced masking. These actions were conducted under the pretense of “protecting the lives of children.” However, these totalitarian mind controls and behavioral abuses were used to coerce parents and their children to comply with an experiment – an experiment that has caused mass suffering and death.
Childhood mortality spikes across Europe, leading to massive investigation and probable cover-up
The European Union’s official statistics department is now conducting a Europe-wide investigation into this excess death in children. This has led to some new revelations. The organization in charge of publishing mortality data, the European Mortality Monitoring Projects (EuroMOMO), altered the baseline by which excess deaths are measured, obviously in an attempt to coverup these historic crimes against children. The alteration in the baseline was reported in week 36, right after the investigation was announced. This abrupt action artificially reduced the number of excess deaths in children, making it appear as though nothing serious ever happened to children over the past fifteen months.
When the baseline is restored, the excess in childhood mortality for children ages 1 to 14 increases to 755 percent and also increases by 630 percent for all age groups. The average excess deaths among children aged 0 to 14 from week 22, 2017 to week 37, 2021 was 169.65. From week 22, 2021 to week 37, 2022, the number of excess deaths spikes to 1,224!
According to statistics from 2020, deaths among children were well BELOW normal. Strangely enough, there were 408 fewer deaths among children than expected in 2020, when compared to previous years.
These trends continued throughout 2021, up until week 22, which is when the EMA rolled out covid vaccination for children ages 12-15. Excess mortality was recorded every week from that point forward, skyrocketing beyond the baseline normal. By 2022, up to three needless doses of covid vaccine have been made available to children 12 and over. Children as young as five have also been introduced to the two-dose Pfizer jab. As new doses of covid vaccine are pushed onto children, European governments are creating a new baseline normal of excess mortality in children.
The covid vaccine program appears to be the greatest threat to public health
The EUROMOMO system reports mortality across 29 European countries on a weekly basis. The system is supported by a network of organizations that have a vested interest in promoting vaccination. These include the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) and the World Health Organization (WHO). After all, the EUROMOMO system was setup to “detect and measure excess deaths related to seasonal influenza, pandemics and other public health threats,” and vaccination campaigns were supposed to be the answer to these stated public health threats.
The WHO’s insistence to snuff out “vaccine hesitancy” caused many people to succumb to manipulation, coercion and physical destruction of their mind, livelihood and physical health — an attack so violent, it has breached parental rights and preyed upon the lives of an entire generation of children. The public’s blind faith in vaccination has resulted in excess mortality across the board, as children are made victims. It appears as if the covid fear campaigns were disingenuous all along, and the vaccine program was the greatest threat.

European children suffer appalling 755% increase in excess death after COVID VACCINE approval – NaturalNews.com



From: Showtalk 


People change their minds based on personal experiences.


From: WALTER784 





From: Dee (DLAINEDEE) 


Those that said no or don't know, are under massive mind control.  They just won't allow themselves to admit that they were deceived.  Or worse, their minds have been blocked so that they can't believe truth.