Opinion Polls: Delphi's Polling Place

Hosted by Showtalk

Opinion polls on all subjects. Opinions? Heck yes, we have opinions - but we're *always* nice about it, even when ours are diametrically opposed to yours. Register your vote today!

  • 5002
    MEMBERS
  • 130166
    MESSAGES
  • 4
    POSTS TODAY

Discussions

In light of recent info are vaccines ...   The Healthy You: Health and Fitness Polls

Started 10/24/22 by WALTER784; 50541 views.
WALTER784
Staff

From: WALTER784 

2/23/23

They attack anything that can prevent/reduce the dependency on vaccines & boosters.

Hydroxychloroquine, Ivermectin, other cocktails, and now eggs... 

They're persistent upon having everybody vaxed and boosted for some nefarious reason or another... perhaps depopulation? 

FWIW

 

In reply toRe: msg 344
WALTER784
Staff

From: WALTER784 

2/24/23

Top 10 Questions A Covid Commission Should Probe About The United States’ Pandemic Response

BY: SHAWN FLEETWOOD
FEBRUARY 09, 2023

Here’s what Congress should be asking health officials about the handling of the Covid pandemic.
 
In March 2020, American politicians orchestrated what would become the greatest assault against their citizens’ civil liberties in the modern era. Under the guise of “public health,” federal and state officials employed the outbreak of the Covid-19 virus to implement disastrous and ineffective lockdown policies, which crushed American jobs and small businesses, shuttered places of worship, and kept low-risk children out of school.
 
Despite a lack of evidence showing such policies were effective at containing the respiratory virus, politicians and government bureaucrats charged ahead, abusing the so-called “public health emergency” to implement fruitless mask and vaccine mandates, while simultaneously ignoring data regarding natural immunity and potentially life-saving treatments.
 
Now, nearly three years later, a coalition of medical professionals is demanding government officials answer for their actions. In a new 80-page report, the Norfolk Group, which is comprised of figures such as Drs. Jay Bhattacharya and Martin Kulldorff, lays out a blueprint “containing key public health questions” for a possible congressional “COVID-19 commission.” Throughout the document, the authors raise valid concerns and queries about the U.S. government’s and the medical industry’s handling of the Covid pandemic, in an effort to make sure that such destructive maladministration never happens again.
 
1. What Could Have Been Done to Better Protect Older, High-Risk Americans?
 
As noted in the report, age is the “single most important risk factor in predicting hospitalization or death” for Covid patients. Take for example the fact that from the beginning of the outbreak until June 2020, residents of long-term care facilities comprised 40 percent of Covid-related deaths in the country.
 
Given such information, it remains completely implausible why Democrat governors such as former New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo would order infectious, Covid-positive patients into nursing homes, placing other vulnerable seniors at risk of infection. What would justify such a decision? And how many lives were lost because of it?
 
2. Why Was Natural Immunity to Covid Ignored?
 
Immunity to viruses acquired through prior infection (otherwise known as natural immunity) has been a globally recognized concept for centuries. So, why was it so outwardly dismissed by health agencies when it came to Covid?
 
From early on in the pandemic, multiple studies showed previously contracting Covid helped individuals stave off reinfection. In a study conducted by researchers from Maccabi Healthcare and Tel Aviv University in Israel, for instance, which has been shown to use more accurate methodology than CDC studies on the same topic, found people with natural immunity to Covid could be 13 times less likely to contract the virus than those who were solely jabbed with the Pfizer shot.
 
“By October 2021, there was substantial evidence of robust immunity in persons with a history of only mild or asymptomatic infections,” the Norfolk Group report reads. “Despite this, the CDC claimed that ‘there are insufficient data to extend the findings related to infection-induced immunity at this time to persons with very mild or asymptomatic infection or children.'”
 
3. Why Were Schools and Colleges Closed?
 
Much like with natural immunity, the science surrounding children and Covid was known in the early stages of the pandemic. Unlike in older adults, Covid presents a low risk to children, and children are less likely to transmit the virus than adults.
 
Yet, none of this made a difference to many U.S. politicians, who kept schools closed for months and deprived children of social interaction and an in-person education. (It was later revealed that teachers unions played a role in pressuring the CDC to pump the brakes on its guidelines for school reopenings.)
 
4. Why Was Covid Prioritized over Other Health Problems?
 
Due to the lockdown strategy and public officials’ singular focus on Covid, individuals with non-Covid health problems were unable to acquire the care they desperately needed. As noted in the report, the number of Americans undergoing cancer screenings and emergency room visits plummeted during the lockdowns, while a
...[Message truncated]
View Full Message
In reply toRe: msg 345
WALTER784
Staff

From: WALTER784 

2/24/23

Why would they force this on people who need financial aid? Perhaps to ensure they're killed off over the next few years so that government handouts don't need to be paid until they die... (i.e. make their deaths quicker and pay less?!?!?!) As dubious as it may seem... I am open to other possible explanations!!!

It Begins: Brazilian Socialist President Lula da Silva Forces Poor Families to Vaccinate their Children So They Can Receive Financial Aid from His Regime Or Risk Receiving Nothing (VIDEO)

By Jim Hoft
Feb. 11, 2023 1:00 pm

Stolen elections have consequences.
 
Brazil’s socialist President, Lula da Silva, has made mandatory childhood vaccinations a condition of receiving government subsidies.
 
The socialist president announced that parents would once again need to provide proof of vaccination for their children in order to participate in the Bolsa Familia program and receive the benefit, or else families will not receive any help from the government.
 
“The Bolsa Família Program (BFP) in Brazil is a conditional cash transfer program with national coverage that aims to support families living in poverty or extreme poverty, as well as expanding access to education and health services. The program was created by the federal government in October 2003 and enshrined in law in January 2004,” according to Inter-American Development Bank (IDB).
 
The program targeted families with children and adolescents aged 0-17, where the household income is equal to or less than R$ 85.00 ($16.30) per person in extreme poverty, or between R$ 85.01 ($16.3) and R$ 170.00 ($33) in poverty.
 
Tens of millions of people are promised something akin to a universal basic income, but they will only receive it if they comply with Lula’s demands, The Rio Times reported.
 
“For God’s sake, we can’t be ignorant to the point of thinking it’s not worth getting vaccinated,” said Lula during the inauguration of the ophthalmology and diagnostic units in Benfica, Rio de Janeiro.
 
“I keep asking myself what kind of love does this mother have for her children, that she doesn’t take care of them at the most important moment when they can be vaccinated and can avoid a more delicate disease in their lives,” Lula continued.
 
Lula announced that the campaign of Zé Gotinha, a mascot used to make vaccination campaigns more attractive to children, will begin.
 
“We can’t hesitate; we can’t play around. It is a question of science,” he said.
 
It is still unclear which vaccines would be required in the program, but Lula hinted about COVID vaccines in his speech.
 
“If there are ten covid vaccines, 50 to take, I will take as many as necessary because I like my life. I think everyone has a duty to their children’s life, take them [to vaccinate] at the right age, that’s why they say the Bolsa Família is coming back,” Lula said.
 
“The Bolsa Família is coming back, and it is coming back with something important; it is coming back with conditions,” he added.
 
The Bolsa Familia program has four conditions:
 
First, children up to 6 years old will receive R$ 150 ($29) more.
Second, the children have to be at school, if they’re not at school, the mother loses the benefit.
Third, the children have to be vaccinated, if they’re not vaccinated, the mother also loses the benefit
Fourth, if the mother is in gestational stage, she has to take all the tests that medicine requires so that she can have a child that is “robust, strong and beautiful like me [Lula].
 
Watch the video below:
 
The Gateway Pundit previously reported that six bills are currently being introduced in the Brazilian senate that would criminalize those who refuse the mandated dose of COVID shots or who comment negatively about the vaccine’s efficacy and safety.
 
Senator Angelo Coronel of the Social Democratic Party of Brazil authored a bill (PL 5555/2020), which proposes adding a one- to three-year prison sentence to the Criminal Code for those “who omit or oppose the mandatory vaccination of children or adolescents” during a declared “public health emergency.”
 
Those who choose not to comply with the country’s forced vaccination schedule will face a prison sentence of two to eight years.
 
Anyone spreading “fake news” regarding the safety and efficacy of the COVID vaccines will face the same prison time.
 
If the person works for the government, the penalty will be doubled.

It Begins: Brazilian Socialist President Lula da Silva Forces Poor Families to Vaccinate their Children So They Can Receive Financial Aid from His Regime Or Risk Receiving Nothing (VIDEO) | The Gateway Pundit

FWIW

  • Edited February 24, 2023 9:08 am  by  WALTER784
In reply toRe: msg 346
WALTER784
Staff

From: WALTER784 

2/27/23

What SPREADS CANCER faster: Chemotherapy, radiation or Covid vaccines?

Monday, January 30, 2023
by: S.D. Wells

(Natural News) There are already enough commonplace causes of cancer in the world that we certainly do not need forms of medicine to also cause the uncontrolled mutation, division, and multiplication of our own cells, that turn and attack our body. Consumers already have to sift through every product they buy, including food, beverages, personal care items, and cleaning supplies, searching for chemicals that cause cancer. If they don’t, it’s easy to wind up like one out of every three Americans, who gets cancer and has about a 50 percent chance of surviving it past five years.
 
It’s a sad state of affairs in America, that when a patient goes to the doctor for medicine, treatments, vaccines, or even just diagnostic testing, their chances of getting cancer or spreading the cancer they already have greatly increase, and it’s all thanks to “modern medicine.” Allopathic is a bad, bad word in these parts, and if you don’t know what causes cancer, that comes highly recommended by doctors as “safe and effective,” then it’s like walking blindly into the forest at night. You’re just prey for the predators, and bad things happen.
 
What spreads cancer faster, the drip, medical imaging scans, or the Wuhan virus clot shots?
 
Physicians, scientists, and oncologists love to say everything they recommend or prescribe is “science-based,” so then let’s take a look at the science behind some treatments, medicines, and testing where the evidence-based research is clear that the risks far outweigh any benefits. We start this off with research conducted at the Albert Einstein College of Medicine of Yeshiva University that reveals chemotherapy spreads cancer throughout the body, causing an alarmingly high increase in cancer cells that circulate throughout the body, infesting new areas.
 
Brighteon.TV
 
That means that doctors find cancer somewhere in the body, and their first line of treatment is flooding the body with chemicals that create new cancers and spread them throughout the body at a high rate. How is this “science-based” medicine? If there were a natural remedy that did that, it would certainly be banned from all use by the FDA, CDC, and AMA. Here’s a quote from the summary of the study: “the authors discovered that several types of chemotherapy can increase the amounts of TMEM complexes and circulating tumor cells in the bloodstream.”
 
Also, “chemotherapy, despite decreasing tumor size, increases the risk of metastatic dissemination.” That’s just repeat business for the cancer industrial complex. You can just hear the oncologist a few months later saying, “the cancer came back sir/ma’am, looks like you need stronger doses of chemo.”
 
Did you know that at least 25,000 Americans get cancer from medical radiation exposure every year?
 
Imagine, you go to the doctor or hospital to get medical scans for cancer, and those scans are exactly what give you cancer, even if you don’t have it yet. Medical imaging radiation causes DNA damage that leads to cancer, but doctors keep on with the keep on. Do they even care?
 
These health risks happen for the short term and in the long run. So whether the doctors have you undergo computed tomography (CT), positron emission tomography (PET), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), or X-ray scans, your body is experiencing ionizing radiation. In fact, one single CT scan can expose the body to 500 times the amount of radiation released by a single x-ray.
 
According to data, radiation exposure from medical scans accounts for 1.5 percent of all cancer cases in the United States, and CT scans (radiology and biomedical imaging) are responsible for the bulk of this high radiation exposure.
 
The most surprising cause of cancer? The Covid clot shots
 
Cancer cells feed off of toxins in the blood. They feed off sugar, alcohol, nicotine, GMOs, nitrates, artificial sweeteners, prescription drugs, heavy metal toxins, industrial chemicals, glyphosate, pesticides, fluoride, chlorine, and yes, virus-mimicking spike protein prions from the Fauci Flu jabs. As the spike proteins clog and clot the vascular system, less oxygen and nutrients are being delivered throughout the body.
 
Plus, spike proteins can prevent your own immune system from recognizing mutations of your cells when they divide, enabling cancer cells to develop and multiply uncontrollably and under the radar of your natural defense system. Research reveals that the Covid clot shots turn off your P-53 gene so your body can no longer fight
...[Message truncated]
View Full Message
In reply toRe: msg 347
WALTER784
Staff

From: WALTER784 

2/27/23

Even Bill Gates admits the vaccines don't work!

Covid injections are ineffective and don’t block transmission, says Bill Gates AFTER selling his shares in BioNTech for a massive profit

BY RHODA WILSON
FEBRUARY 11, 2023

In 2021, Bill Gates called mRNA injections “game changers.” Contrast that with his latest statements, after turning his $55 million investment into $550 million, acknowledging the injections’ failures. What evil plan is he hatching next?
 
In 2019, Bill Gates invested $55 million in BioNtech – which developed the covid injection for Pfizer – it’s now worth $550 million.
 
Gates sold some of the stock at the end of 2022 when the share price was over $300.  After reaping huge profits, Gates criticised covid injections, stating they don’t block infection, aren’t effective against variants and have “very short duration.”
 
Gates’ motivations run far deeper than making money off shrewd investments. By funding the World Health Organisation (“WHO”), Gates is able to ensure that the decisions it makes end up profiting his own interests and those of his Big Pharma partners.  Gates – via collaborations with WHO, Anthony Fauci and others – is aiming to have absolute power to control pandemic declarations and responses worldwide.
 
 
The Hill: Bill Gates MRNA Grift EXPOSED? Billionaire TRASHES Jab Despite Reaping MASSIVE Profits, 25 January 2023 (9 mins)
 
By Dr. Joseph Mercola
 
In The Hill video above, Bill Gates trashes mRNA covid-19 injections, naming three problems with them that need to be fixed. “The current vaccines are not infection-blocking,” Gates says, “They’re not broad – so when new variants come up you lose protection – and they have very short duration, particularly in the people who matter, which are old people.”1
 
Covid-19 injections’ lack of efficacy and safety is not news, so why is this a remarkable statement coming from Gates? He’s been a major proponent of mRNA technology and invested heavily in BioNTech, which developed the covid-19 injection for Pfizer. He’s since sold a lot of those shares, earning a 10x profit.
 
Gates Reaps Windfall Profits From mRNA Injection Investment
 
As reported by The Hill’s co-host Briahna Joy Gray, Gates invested $55 million in BioNtech in 2019, and it’s now worth $550 million. He sold some of the stock at the end of 2022 when the share price was over $300 – representing a massive gain. Co-host Robby Soave then states:2
 
Let’s follow that trajectory: [Gates] invests heavily in BioNTech, “mRNA vaccines are great, this is the future,” he talks about the vaccine timeline and how we can develop it faster, “we might have to cut some corners on safety” … All in … sells it … makes a huge amount of money … but now it’s “yeah, it’s okay, it could be better, but what we really need is this breath spray.”
 
Soave is referring to a statement Gates made regarding a type of inhaler that could be used “very early in an epidemic” to block people from becoming infected.3 The glaring conflict of interest is only highlighted by Gates’ about-face regarding the injections.
 
In 2021, Gates called mRNA injections “magic” and “game changers.” He’s also said: “Everyone who takes the vaccine is not just protecting themselves but reducing their transmission to other people and allowing society to get back to normal.”4 Contrast that with his latest statements acknowledging the injections’ failures. Investigative journalist Jordan Schachtel explained:5
 
Microsoft founder Bill Gates, who served as one of the architects of covid hysteria and had more of an impact than any other individual on the disastrous global pandemic policies, has finally acknowledged that the mRNA shots he’s been promoting for two years are nothing more than expired pharma junk.
 
Translation: Gates admits that the shots are impossible to align with rapidly developing variants, they expire in lightning speed, and they don’t stop transmission. And they don’t work for the only at-risk portion of the population.
 
Gates’ major reversal on the injections comes too late, however, as his prior praises were instrumental in dictating government policy, despite his massive financial conflicts of interest. Soave adds:
 
...[Message truncated]
View Full Message
In reply toRe: msg 348
WALTER784
Staff

From: WALTER784 

2/27/23

New Onset Type 1 Diabetes after COVID-19 Vaccination

Lifelong Problem Will Be Great Regret for Unfortunate Victims

Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH™
Feb 2, 2023

New Onset Type 1 Diabetes after COVID-19 Vaccination
 
Lifelong Problem Will Be Great Regret for Unfortunate Victims
 
It has been said we are in a chronic disease epidemic of diabetes mellitus. Before COVID-19, approximately 10% of diabetes was juvenile Type 1, which is an auto-immune illness characterized by auto-antibodies against pancreatic islet cells. The remaining 90% is adult onset type 2 diabetes characterized by lifelong excess in adiposity and insulin resistance. Mass vaccination with mRNA and adenoviral DNA vaccines may change the epidemiology of diabetes as we know it. There are several papers emerging concerning new onset diabetes and diabetic ketoacidosis after taking a COVID-19 shot. Moon and colleagues reported a well characterized case of new onset type 1 diabetes in an adult temporally related to COVID-19 vaccination.
 
Courageous Discourse™ with Dr. Peter McCullough & John Leake is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.
 
Moon H, Suh S, Park MK. Adult-Onset Type 1 Diabetes Development Following COVID-19 mRNA Vaccination. J Korean Med Sci. 2023 Jan 9;38(2):e12. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2023.38.e12. PMID: 36625174; PMCID: PMC9829515.
 
The rapid depletion of endogenous insulin (C-peptide) and detectable auto-antibodies suggests this new condition for the vaccine recipient will be permanent. This means lifelong insulin and glucose monitoring as a regrettable consequence of accepting a vaccine. This case and the others calls for a sweep of vaccine safety databases and clinical trials looking for hyperglycemia, diabetic ketoacidosis, and well-documented new onset diabetes. This will be only way for epidemiologists and diabetologists to develop risk stratification and detection methods. Because the auto-immune attack on the pancreas can be insidious and take time, I am concerned that months or years later the chronic disease epidemic of diabetes mellitus could be intensified by mass vaccination.
 
COVID-19 vaccine side effects that occur way less than one percent of the time can be a large problem for the community since nearly the entire population was duped or forced into vaccination. For so many reasons, any novel EUA vaccine campaign should be targeted on a small group at the highest risk so large numbers are not exposed to permanent side effects such as insulin-dependent type 1 diabetes.

New Onset Type 1 Diabetes after COVID-19 Vaccination (substack.com)

FWIW

In reply toRe: msg 349
WALTER784
Staff

From: WALTER784 

2/28/23

So many people recently ‘died suddenly’ – What’s going on?

February 13, 2023
By Brian C. Joondeph, M.D.

A new and increasingly popular Twitter hashtag is “#diedsuddenly” in response to a surge of sudden unexplained deaths among mostly young and healthy individuals, including athletes, occurring over the past 2 years. Here are but a few recent news stories.
 
In Australia, “Fit and healthy 21 year old son dies suddenly in his sleep.” From the University of Arizona, “A recent member of Arizona’s men’s swim team has unexpectedly passed away.” In Detroit, a high school basketball player suffered a cardiac arrest during a basketball game. While they restarted his heart, he hasn’t woken up.
 
Or this athlete in his early 20’s, “A former Florida Gators offensive lineman died suddenly on Thursday night according to multiple media reports.” From the US Army, “A soldier stationed at Fort Stewart died Tuesday while traveling to California for a training exercise.” Is this some type of black magic? Not likely, “America’s Got Talent magician suddenly dies at just 52.”
 
Let’s not forget Buffalo Bills player Damar Hamlin going into cardiac arrest after an unremarkable tackle during a January NFL game. These are anecdotes, and while compelling are not the same as collected data.
 
Several brave researchers recorded these “sudden” and “unexplained” deaths, as they are described in the media. Here is one report, “An investigation of official statistics has found that the number of athletes who have died since the beginning of 2021 has risen exponentially compared to the yearly number of deaths of athletes officially recorded between 1966 and 2004.”
 
This trend was quite worrisome, “So much so that the monthly average number of deaths between January 2021 and April 2022 is 1,700% higher than the monthly average between 1966 and 2004.”
 
Where are the 3-letter health agencies? Why haven’t the FDA, NIH, or CDC offered their own data to refute this alleged increase in sudden deaths? If this is all “misinformation” as big tech and the corporate media describes it, the health agencies should easily be able to disprove it, rather than calling on social media giants to censor or ban anything contrary to their “safe and effective” mantra.
 
Big Medicine and the media attempt to play this all off as normal but average Americans are noticing and are understandably concerned. Since when is it “normal” for high school and college athletes to have heart attacks and blood clots, often fatal? Why are these daily news stories now compared to years ago when one might hear of only a few cases per year, typically attributed to a previously undiagnosed congenital heart defect? Why are these deaths frequently “unexplained” leaving “doctors mystified”?
 
America has the best medical care in the world and few medical maladies remain “unexplained” in 2023, other than the recent surge in sudden deaths among the young and healthy.
 
Are people noticing? Rasmussen Reports asked Americans what they think about all of this. In a national telephone and online survey of 1000 adult Americans published a month ago, four questions were asked.
 
Have you received a COVID-19 vaccination?
 
How likely is it that side effects of COVID-19 vaccines have caused a significant number of unexplained deaths?
 
Do you personally know anyone whose death you think may have been caused by side effects of COVID-19 vaccines?
 
Which is closer to your belief, that there are legitimate reasons to be concerned about the safety of COVID-19 vaccines, or that people who worry about vaccine safety are spreading conspiracy theories?
 
How did they answer? 71% of those surveyed were vaccinated, comparable to the national average. Virtually half of respondents don’t believe the “disinformation” mantra propagated by “fact checkers”, mainstream media, and the government. “49% of American adults believe it is likely that side effects of COVID-19 vaccines have caused a significant number of unexplained deaths, including 28% who think it’s very likely.”
 
Furthermore, “28% of adults say they personally know someone whose death they think may have been caused by side effects of COVID-19 vaccines.” And “48% of Americans believe there are legitimate reasons to be concerned about the
...[Message truncated]
View Full Message
In reply toRe: msg 350
WALTER784
Staff

From: WALTER784 

3/1/23

Why would they shut down a WHO presentation unless they had something to hide?

WHO whistle-blower shut down at Stockholm conference while presenting her research on the “virus fear to digital control” agenda

BY RHODA WILSON
FEBRUARY 15, 2023

The organisers of the international conference held in Stockholm, Sweden, cut off Dr. Astrid Stuckelberger’s microphone two-thirds of the way through her presentation.  It was at the point Dr. Stuckelberger moved into discussing graphene oxide found in covid injection vials that she said her microphone was cut off.
 
Dr. Stuckelberger is a scientist, international health expert, author and public speaker.  The international conference ‘Pandemic Strategies: Lessons and Consequences’ was held at the Stockholm Waterfront on 21-22 January 2023.  A copy of the programme can be found HERE. Dr. Astrid Stuckelberger was allotted 40 minutes at the end of the second day to give her presentation.
 
Unfortunately, Dr. Stuckleberger’s presentation was cut short.  She explained in a Telegram post:
 
Ryan Cole encouraged by the organisers stepped up on stage to stop my conference, to discredit me on nanotech/oxyde graphene…cut my talk off 15 minutes, even cut my microphone and said it was because of time …. but then they took 5 minutes to say there was no oxyde graphene in the vials … they also tried to censor me during the debate that followed…
 
Her presentation was titled ‘From Biology to Population: Evidenced-Based Public Health Situation Analysis, Lessons and Next Steps’. “Censorship occurred at point C when I presented the results of nanotech and oxyde graphene in the vials,” she said.
 
Source: Dr. Astrid Stuckelberger on Telegram
 
“[Below is] one of the slides that made them jump off their chairs,” Dr. Stuckelberger posted on her Telegram channel. “The slide that provoked the opposition of Ryan Cole, Sven Román & co in Stockholm on Sunday.”
 
After Dr. Stuckelberger’s presentation, there was time allocated for a panel discussion.  Dr. Ryan Cole, who had made a presentation in the morning, was not part of this panel.  However, during the discussion, he jumped up onto the stage, took over the microphone and declared that in all the vials he had tested he had not found evidence of graphene oxide.
 
Dr. Glenn Dormer attended the conference.  He stood up and yelled out in defence of Dr. Stuckelberger.  According to Dr. Ana Maria Mihalcea, Dr. Dormer said: “[Dr. Stuckelberger] is risking her life to tell more truth than we have heard in the last 2 days in this congregation … They had to have a reason why they had to demic her after only 40 [minutes].” Which is slightly confusing as 40 minutes was Dr. Stuckelberger’s allotted time.  Some accounts state Dr. Dormer said “they had to demic her after only 30 [minutes].“  Unfortunately, we weren’t able to find Dr. Dormer’s original statement to verify which version is correct.
 
Dr. Astrid Stuckelberger Silenced by Dr. Ryan Cole at Pandemic Strategies Conference 1-22-23 (1 min)
 
In the video below, Dr. Dormer recalled what Dr. Stuckelberger revealed in her presentation before she was cut off.
 
Dr. Jane Ruby: Aftertalk – Dr. Glenn Dormer, 31 January 2023 (18 mins)
 
We hope that the organisers of the event and Dr. Ryan Cole will explain why Dr. Stuckelberger’s presentation was curtailed.  It is important to hear all sides of a story before making a judgement.  We have not seen an explanation from Dr. Cole or the organisers and we would appreciate it if any of our readers come across one to post a link to it in the comments section below this article. 
 
Sage’s Newsletter noted remarks from Dr. Meryl Nass and Dr. Jessica Rose who both felt that Dr. Stuckelberger’s presentation had not been stopped early.  Dr. Rose said that Dr. Stuckelberger in fact ran over the time allocated.
 
Until the video of her presentation is released, we are unable to gauge for ourselves.   If Dr. Stuckelberger’s and Dr. Dormer’s account of events is correct then we need to face up to the reality of censorship occurring within the freedom movement.
 
We do not agree with curtailing or controlling information scientists and researchers want to present to the world.  Scientists and researchers will frequently disagree with each other.  These disagreements are healthy in
...[Message truncated]
View Full Message
In reply toRe: msg 351
WALTER784
Staff

From: WALTER784 

3/1/23

Dozens of Scientists around the World claim to have discovered Graphene & Nanotechnology in the COVID-19 Vaccines

BY THE EXPOSÉ
DECEMBER 1, 2022

Scientists have published an urgent review of the Covid-19 injections in which they claim to have discovered nanotechnology and Graphene Oxide in both the Pfizer and Moderna mRNA injections, and both the AstraZeneca and Janssen viral vector injections. The new review backs up the findings of numerous other scientists from around the world.
 
Nanoscience and nanotechnology involve the ability to see and control individual atoms and molecules. Everything on Earth is made up of atoms—the food we eat, the clothes we wear, the buildings and houses we live in, and our own bodies.
 
But something as small as an atom is impossible to see with the naked eye. In fact, it’s impossible to see with the microscopes typically used in high school science classes. The microscopes needed to see things at the nanoscale were invented in the early 1980s.
 
Once scientists had the right tools, such as the scanning tunnelling microscope (STM) and the atomic force microscope (AFM), the age of nanotechnology was born.
 
And now scientists from Spain, have declared that nanotechnology, which has the ability to control atoms in your body, has been found in all of the Covid-19 injections alongside Graphene Oxide.
 
According to scientists, Graphene Oxide is detected in the immune system as if it were a pathogen. Once injected it has an affinity for the central nervous system, potentially causing paralysis, strokes and alteration of the nervous system.
 
The scientists also explain that Graphene Oxide has the potential to cause blood clots, which explains why the Covid-19 injections increase the risk of suffering thrombosis with thrombocytopenia.
 
It is not just scientists from Spain making these claims though. Numerous scientists around the world have now published findings where they allege they have discovered both nanotechnology and Graphene Oxide in the Covid-19 injections.
 
Scientists discover ‘Carbon Nanotech’ & ‘Radioactive Thulium’ in Pfizer & Moderna COVID Vaccines
 
After reviewing electron microscope images of elements contained in the Covid Pfizer and Moderna injections, Dr Daniel Nagase, a Canadian emergency room doctor, revealed that, strangely, the contents of the Pfizer and Moderna “vaccines” show no signs of biological material, including mRNA or DNA. (Read more here).
 
Dr Nagase’s research group looked at these Moderna and Pfizer samples under a regular microscope. Although there were a lot of very interesting images, they were unable to be conclusive about what exactly they were seeing. So, they used an electron microscope to determine what elements the “vaccines” contained.
 
Here are some of the images of what they found –
 
Found in a Moderna Covid “vaccine” sample
 
Dr. Nagase examined a “ball with the legs growing out of it” found inside a Moderna sample. “This shape, this ball with the legs growing out of it, for some reason has aluminium in it. And I can say with certainty that this isn’t a mould spore or some other type of biological contamination, because the only thing in it is carbon, oxygen, and no signs of nitrogen, no signs of phosphorus, which would indicate something biological of origin. So, this thing that’s growing is non-biological.”
 
Dr. Nagase and the researchers also discovered an unusual element from the lanthanide series – thulium – in a fibre-like structure found in a Pfizer sample –
 
Found in a Pfizer Covid “vaccine” sample
 
Dr. Nagase and the researchers found a variety of shapes and structures inside the “vaccine” samples they tested – crystals, chips, strands, bulbs, spheres, fibres and balls with legs growing out of them – “we have polymorphic, which is many different forms,” he said.
 
“They all seem to be made predominantly out of carbon and oxygen and they were in both the Moderna and Pfizer samples, and they seem to be in fibre forms. In the Moderna sample, the carbon-oxygen structures seem to be taking nanosphere forms and crystalline forms. And in the Pfizer sample … seem to only be forming fibres and crystals.
 
...[Message truncated]
View Full Message
In reply toRe: msg 352
WALTER784
Staff

From: WALTER784 

3/1/23

This Is Big: Naomi Wolf Confirms Big Pharma Was Adding Varying Amounts of Active Ingredient to Batches of COVID Vaccine (VIDEO)

By Jim Hoft
Mar. 14, 2022 12:12 pm

Former Clinton adviser and COVID Vaccine critic Naomi Wolf joined Steve Bannon on The War Room on Monday morning. Naomi shared her latest bombshell from her investigation into the Pfizer vaccine documents released by the US government on their COVID vaccine testing. Naomi’s team of investigators, doctors and attorneys identified several US government documents that confirm that Pfizer was adding varying amounts of active ingredient to their experimental COVID vaccines. According to the data, the range of dangerous active ingredient went from 3μg, to 10μg, to 30μg, to 100μg depending on the batch they happened to inject you with.
 
As Naomi mentioned, this ties in directly with the website “How Bad Is My Batch” that was created so you could track how many adverse reaction incidents were linked to the vaccine batch you were given.
 
Now there is proof via AMA documents that they are distributing different doses of the active ingredient in the COVID vaccines based on batch number.
 
What the hell?

This Is Big: Naomi Wolf Confirms Big Pharma Was Adding Varying Amounts of Active Ingredient to Batches of COVID Vaccine (VIDEO) | The Gateway Pundit

FWIW

TOP