Opinion Polls: Delphi's Polling Place
Hosted by Showtalk
Opinion polls on all subjects. Opinions? Heck yes, we have opinions - but we're *always* nice about it, even when ours are diametrically opposed to yours. Register your vote today!
- 5001
MEMBERS - 130130
MESSAGES - 2
POSTS TODAY
Discussions
In light of recent info are vaccines ... The Healthy You: Health and Fitness Polls
Started 10/24/22 by WALTER784; 50433 views.
Staff
From: WALTER784
2/27/23
What SPREADS CANCER faster: Chemotherapy, radiation or Covid vaccines?
Monday, January 30, 2023
by: S.D. Wells
(Natural News) There are already enough commonplace causes of cancer in the world that we certainly do not need forms of medicine to also cause the uncontrolled mutation, division, and multiplication of our own cells, that turn and attack our body. Consumers already have to sift through every product they buy, including food, beverages, personal care items, and cleaning supplies, searching for chemicals that cause cancer. If they don’t, it’s easy to wind up like one out of every three Americans, who gets cancer and has about a 50 percent chance of surviving it past five years.
It’s a sad state of affairs in America, that when a patient goes to the doctor for medicine, treatments, vaccines, or even just diagnostic testing, their chances of getting cancer or spreading the cancer they already have greatly increase, and it’s all thanks to “modern medicine.” Allopathic is a bad, bad word in these parts, and if you don’t know what causes cancer, that comes highly recommended by doctors as “safe and effective,” then it’s like walking blindly into the forest at night. You’re just prey for the predators, and bad things happen.
What spreads cancer faster, the drip, medical imaging scans, or the Wuhan virus clot shots?
Physicians, scientists, and oncologists love to say everything they recommend or prescribe is “science-based,” so then let’s take a look at the science behind some treatments, medicines, and testing where the evidence-based research is clear that the risks far outweigh any benefits. We start this off with research conducted at the Albert Einstein College of Medicine of Yeshiva University that reveals chemotherapy spreads cancer throughout the body, causing an alarmingly high increase in cancer cells that circulate throughout the body, infesting new areas.
Brighteon.TV
That means that doctors find cancer somewhere in the body, and their first line of treatment is flooding the body with chemicals that create new cancers and spread them throughout the body at a high rate. How is this “science-based” medicine? If there were a natural remedy that did that, it would certainly be banned from all use by the FDA, CDC, and AMA. Here’s a quote from the summary of the study: “the authors discovered that several types of chemotherapy can increase the amounts of TMEM complexes and circulating tumor cells in the bloodstream.”
Also, “chemotherapy, despite decreasing tumor size, increases the risk of metastatic dissemination.” That’s just repeat business for the cancer industrial complex. You can just hear the oncologist a few months later saying, “the cancer came back sir/ma’am, looks like you need stronger doses of chemo.”
Did you know that at least 25,000 Americans get cancer from medical radiation exposure every year?
Imagine, you go to the doctor or hospital to get medical scans for cancer, and those scans are exactly what give you cancer, even if you don’t have it yet. Medical imaging radiation causes DNA damage that leads to cancer, but doctors keep on with the keep on. Do they even care?
These health risks happen for the short term and in the long run. So whether the doctors have you undergo computed tomography (CT), positron emission tomography (PET), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), or X-ray scans, your body is experiencing ionizing radiation. In fact, one single CT scan can expose the body to 500 times the amount of radiation released by a single x-ray.
According to data, radiation exposure from medical scans accounts for 1.5 percent of all cancer cases in the United States, and CT scans (radiology and biomedical imaging) are responsible for the bulk of this high radiation exposure.
The most surprising cause of cancer? The Covid clot shots
Cancer cells feed off of toxins in the blood. They feed off sugar, alcohol, nicotine, GMOs, nitrates, artificial sweeteners, prescription drugs, heavy metal toxins, industrial chemicals, glyphosate, pesticides, fluoride, chlorine, and yes, virus-mimicking spike protein prions from the Fauci Flu jabs. As the spike proteins clog and clot the vascular system, less oxygen and nutrients are being delivered throughout the body.
Plus, spike proteins can prevent your own immune system from recognizing mutations of your cells when they divide, enabling cancer cells to develop and multiply uncontrollably and under the radar of your natural defense system. Research reveals that the Covid clot shots turn off your P-53 gene so your body can no longer fight
...[Message truncated]
Staff
From: WALTER784
2/27/23
Even Bill Gates admits the vaccines don't work!
Covid injections are ineffective and don’t block transmission, says Bill Gates AFTER selling his shares in BioNTech for a massive profit
BY RHODA WILSON
FEBRUARY 11, 2023
In 2021, Bill Gates called mRNA injections “game changers.” Contrast that with his latest statements, after turning his $55 million investment into $550 million, acknowledging the injections’ failures. What evil plan is he hatching next?
In 2019, Bill Gates invested $55 million in BioNtech – which developed the covid injection for Pfizer – it’s now worth $550 million.
Gates sold some of the stock at the end of 2022 when the share price was over $300. After reaping huge profits, Gates criticised covid injections, stating they don’t block infection, aren’t effective against variants and have “very short duration.”
Gates’ motivations run far deeper than making money off shrewd investments. By funding the World Health Organisation (“WHO”), Gates is able to ensure that the decisions it makes end up profiting his own interests and those of his Big Pharma partners. Gates – via collaborations with WHO, Anthony Fauci and others – is aiming to have absolute power to control pandemic declarations and responses worldwide.
The Hill: Bill Gates MRNA Grift EXPOSED? Billionaire TRASHES Jab Despite Reaping MASSIVE Profits, 25 January 2023 (9 mins)
By Dr. Joseph Mercola
In The Hill video above, Bill Gates trashes mRNA covid-19 injections, naming three problems with them that need to be fixed. “The current vaccines are not infection-blocking,” Gates says, “They’re not broad – so when new variants come up you lose protection – and they have very short duration, particularly in the people who matter, which are old people.”1
Covid-19 injections’ lack of efficacy and safety is not news, so why is this a remarkable statement coming from Gates? He’s been a major proponent of mRNA technology and invested heavily in BioNTech, which developed the covid-19 injection for Pfizer. He’s since sold a lot of those shares, earning a 10x profit.
Gates Reaps Windfall Profits From mRNA Injection Investment
As reported by The Hill’s co-host Briahna Joy Gray, Gates invested $55 million in BioNtech in 2019, and it’s now worth $550 million. He sold some of the stock at the end of 2022 when the share price was over $300 – representing a massive gain. Co-host Robby Soave then states:2
Let’s follow that trajectory: [Gates] invests heavily in BioNTech, “mRNA vaccines are great, this is the future,” he talks about the vaccine timeline and how we can develop it faster, “we might have to cut some corners on safety” … All in … sells it … makes a huge amount of money … but now it’s “yeah, it’s okay, it could be better, but what we really need is this breath spray.”
Soave is referring to a statement Gates made regarding a type of inhaler that could be used “very early in an epidemic” to block people from becoming infected.3 The glaring conflict of interest is only highlighted by Gates’ about-face regarding the injections.
In 2021, Gates called mRNA injections “magic” and “game changers.” He’s also said: “Everyone who takes the vaccine is not just protecting themselves but reducing their transmission to other people and allowing society to get back to normal.”4 Contrast that with his latest statements acknowledging the injections’ failures. Investigative journalist Jordan Schachtel explained:5
Microsoft founder Bill Gates, who served as one of the architects of covid hysteria and had more of an impact than any other individual on the disastrous global pandemic policies, has finally acknowledged that the mRNA shots he’s been promoting for two years are nothing more than expired pharma junk.
Translation: Gates admits that the shots are impossible to align with rapidly developing variants, they expire in lightning speed, and they don’t stop transmission. And they don’t work for the only at-risk portion of the population.
Gates’ major reversal on the injections comes too late, however, as his prior praises were instrumental in dictating government policy, despite his massive financial conflicts of interest. Soave adds:
...[Message truncated]
Staff
From: WALTER784
2/27/23
New Onset Type 1 Diabetes after COVID-19 Vaccination
Lifelong Problem Will Be Great Regret for Unfortunate Victims
Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH™
Feb 2, 2023
New Onset Type 1 Diabetes after COVID-19 Vaccination
Lifelong Problem Will Be Great Regret for Unfortunate Victims
It has been said we are in a chronic disease epidemic of diabetes mellitus. Before COVID-19, approximately 10% of diabetes was juvenile Type 1, which is an auto-immune illness characterized by auto-antibodies against pancreatic islet cells. The remaining 90% is adult onset type 2 diabetes characterized by lifelong excess in adiposity and insulin resistance. Mass vaccination with mRNA and adenoviral DNA vaccines may change the epidemiology of diabetes as we know it. There are several papers emerging concerning new onset diabetes and diabetic ketoacidosis after taking a COVID-19 shot. Moon and colleagues reported a well characterized case of new onset type 1 diabetes in an adult temporally related to COVID-19 vaccination.
Courageous Discourse™ with Dr. Peter McCullough & John Leake is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.
Moon H, Suh S, Park MK. Adult-Onset Type 1 Diabetes Development Following COVID-19 mRNA Vaccination. J Korean Med Sci. 2023 Jan 9;38(2):e12. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2023.38.e12. PMID: 36625174; PMCID: PMC9829515.
The rapid depletion of endogenous insulin (C-peptide) and detectable auto-antibodies suggests this new condition for the vaccine recipient will be permanent. This means lifelong insulin and glucose monitoring as a regrettable consequence of accepting a vaccine. This case and the others calls for a sweep of vaccine safety databases and clinical trials looking for hyperglycemia, diabetic ketoacidosis, and well-documented new onset diabetes. This will be only way for epidemiologists and diabetologists to develop risk stratification and detection methods. Because the auto-immune attack on the pancreas can be insidious and take time, I am concerned that months or years later the chronic disease epidemic of diabetes mellitus could be intensified by mass vaccination.
COVID-19 vaccine side effects that occur way less than one percent of the time can be a large problem for the community since nearly the entire population was duped or forced into vaccination. For so many reasons, any novel EUA vaccine campaign should be targeted on a small group at the highest risk so large numbers are not exposed to permanent side effects such as insulin-dependent type 1 diabetes.
New Onset Type 1 Diabetes after COVID-19 Vaccination (substack.com)
FWIW
Staff
From: WALTER784
2/28/23
So many people recently ‘died suddenly’ – What’s going on?
February 13, 2023
By Brian C. Joondeph, M.D.
A new and increasingly popular Twitter hashtag is “#diedsuddenly” in response to a surge of sudden unexplained deaths among mostly young and healthy individuals, including athletes, occurring over the past 2 years. Here are but a few recent news stories.
In Australia, “Fit and healthy 21 year old son dies suddenly in his sleep.” From the University of Arizona, “A recent member of Arizona’s men’s swim team has unexpectedly passed away.” In Detroit, a high school basketball player suffered a cardiac arrest during a basketball game. While they restarted his heart, he hasn’t woken up.
Or this athlete in his early 20’s, “A former Florida Gators offensive lineman died suddenly on Thursday night according to multiple media reports.” From the US Army, “A soldier stationed at Fort Stewart died Tuesday while traveling to California for a training exercise.” Is this some type of black magic? Not likely, “America’s Got Talent magician suddenly dies at just 52.”
Let’s not forget Buffalo Bills player Damar Hamlin going into cardiac arrest after an unremarkable tackle during a January NFL game. These are anecdotes, and while compelling are not the same as collected data.
Several brave researchers recorded these “sudden” and “unexplained” deaths, as they are described in the media. Here is one report, “An investigation of official statistics has found that the number of athletes who have died since the beginning of 2021 has risen exponentially compared to the yearly number of deaths of athletes officially recorded between 1966 and 2004.”
This trend was quite worrisome, “So much so that the monthly average number of deaths between January 2021 and April 2022 is 1,700% higher than the monthly average between 1966 and 2004.”
Where are the 3-letter health agencies? Why haven’t the FDA, NIH, or CDC offered their own data to refute this alleged increase in sudden deaths? If this is all “misinformation” as big tech and the corporate media describes it, the health agencies should easily be able to disprove it, rather than calling on social media giants to censor or ban anything contrary to their “safe and effective” mantra.
Big Medicine and the media attempt to play this all off as normal but average Americans are noticing and are understandably concerned. Since when is it “normal” for high school and college athletes to have heart attacks and blood clots, often fatal? Why are these daily news stories now compared to years ago when one might hear of only a few cases per year, typically attributed to a previously undiagnosed congenital heart defect? Why are these deaths frequently “unexplained” leaving “doctors mystified”?
America has the best medical care in the world and few medical maladies remain “unexplained” in 2023, other than the recent surge in sudden deaths among the young and healthy.
Are people noticing? Rasmussen Reports asked Americans what they think about all of this. In a national telephone and online survey of 1000 adult Americans published a month ago, four questions were asked.
Have you received a COVID-19 vaccination?
How likely is it that side effects of COVID-19 vaccines have caused a significant number of unexplained deaths?
Do you personally know anyone whose death you think may have been caused by side effects of COVID-19 vaccines?
Which is closer to your belief, that there are legitimate reasons to be concerned about the safety of COVID-19 vaccines, or that people who worry about vaccine safety are spreading conspiracy theories?
How did they answer? 71% of those surveyed were vaccinated, comparable to the national average. Virtually half of respondents don’t believe the “disinformation” mantra propagated by “fact checkers”, mainstream media, and the government. “49% of American adults believe it is likely that side effects of COVID-19 vaccines have caused a significant number of unexplained deaths, including 28% who think it’s very likely.”
Furthermore, “28% of adults say they personally know someone whose death they think may have been caused by side effects of COVID-19 vaccines.” And “48% of Americans believe there are legitimate reasons to be concerned about the
...[Message truncated]
Staff
From: WALTER784
3/1/23
Why would they shut down a WHO presentation unless they had something to hide?
WHO whistle-blower shut down at Stockholm conference while presenting her research on the “virus fear to digital control” agenda
BY RHODA WILSON
FEBRUARY 15, 2023
The organisers of the international conference held in Stockholm, Sweden, cut off Dr. Astrid Stuckelberger’s microphone two-thirds of the way through her presentation. It was at the point Dr. Stuckelberger moved into discussing graphene oxide found in covid injection vials that she said her microphone was cut off.
Dr. Stuckelberger is a scientist, international health expert, author and public speaker. The international conference ‘Pandemic Strategies: Lessons and Consequences’ was held at the Stockholm Waterfront on 21-22 January 2023. A copy of the programme can be found HERE. Dr. Astrid Stuckelberger was allotted 40 minutes at the end of the second day to give her presentation.
Unfortunately, Dr. Stuckleberger’s presentation was cut short. She explained in a Telegram post:
Ryan Cole encouraged by the organisers stepped up on stage to stop my conference, to discredit me on nanotech/oxyde graphene…cut my talk off 15 minutes, even cut my microphone and said it was because of time …. but then they took 5 minutes to say there was no oxyde graphene in the vials … they also tried to censor me during the debate that followed…
Her presentation was titled ‘From Biology to Population: Evidenced-Based Public Health Situation Analysis, Lessons and Next Steps’. “Censorship occurred at point C when I presented the results of nanotech and oxyde graphene in the vials,” she said.
Source: Dr. Astrid Stuckelberger on Telegram
“[Below is] one of the slides that made them jump off their chairs,” Dr. Stuckelberger posted on her Telegram channel. “The slide that provoked the opposition of Ryan Cole, Sven Román & co in Stockholm on Sunday.”
After Dr. Stuckelberger’s presentation, there was time allocated for a panel discussion. Dr. Ryan Cole, who had made a presentation in the morning, was not part of this panel. However, during the discussion, he jumped up onto the stage, took over the microphone and declared that in all the vials he had tested he had not found evidence of graphene oxide.
Dr. Glenn Dormer attended the conference. He stood up and yelled out in defence of Dr. Stuckelberger. According to Dr. Ana Maria Mihalcea, Dr. Dormer said: “[Dr. Stuckelberger] is risking her life to tell more truth than we have heard in the last 2 days in this congregation … They had to have a reason why they had to demic her after only 40 [minutes].” Which is slightly confusing as 40 minutes was Dr. Stuckelberger’s allotted time. Some accounts state Dr. Dormer said “they had to demic her after only 30 [minutes].“ Unfortunately, we weren’t able to find Dr. Dormer’s original statement to verify which version is correct.
Dr. Astrid Stuckelberger Silenced by Dr. Ryan Cole at Pandemic Strategies Conference 1-22-23 (1 min)
In the video below, Dr. Dormer recalled what Dr. Stuckelberger revealed in her presentation before she was cut off.
Dr. Jane Ruby: Aftertalk – Dr. Glenn Dormer, 31 January 2023 (18 mins)
We hope that the organisers of the event and Dr. Ryan Cole will explain why Dr. Stuckelberger’s presentation was curtailed. It is important to hear all sides of a story before making a judgement. We have not seen an explanation from Dr. Cole or the organisers and we would appreciate it if any of our readers come across one to post a link to it in the comments section below this article.
Sage’s Newsletter noted remarks from Dr. Meryl Nass and Dr. Jessica Rose who both felt that Dr. Stuckelberger’s presentation had not been stopped early. Dr. Rose said that Dr. Stuckelberger in fact ran over the time allocated.
Until the video of her presentation is released, we are unable to gauge for ourselves. If Dr. Stuckelberger’s and Dr. Dormer’s account of events is correct then we need to face up to the reality of censorship occurring within the freedom movement.
We do not agree with curtailing or controlling information scientists and researchers want to present to the world. Scientists and researchers will frequently disagree with each other. These disagreements are healthy in
...[Message truncated]
Staff
From: WALTER784
3/1/23
Dozens of Scientists around the World claim to have discovered Graphene & Nanotechnology in the COVID-19 Vaccines
BY THE EXPOSÉ
DECEMBER 1, 2022
Scientists have published an urgent review of the Covid-19 injections in which they claim to have discovered nanotechnology and Graphene Oxide in both the Pfizer and Moderna mRNA injections, and both the AstraZeneca and Janssen viral vector injections. The new review backs up the findings of numerous other scientists from around the world.
Nanoscience and nanotechnology involve the ability to see and control individual atoms and molecules. Everything on Earth is made up of atoms—the food we eat, the clothes we wear, the buildings and houses we live in, and our own bodies.
But something as small as an atom is impossible to see with the naked eye. In fact, it’s impossible to see with the microscopes typically used in high school science classes. The microscopes needed to see things at the nanoscale were invented in the early 1980s.
Once scientists had the right tools, such as the scanning tunnelling microscope (STM) and the atomic force microscope (AFM), the age of nanotechnology was born.
And now scientists from Spain, have declared that nanotechnology, which has the ability to control atoms in your body, has been found in all of the Covid-19 injections alongside Graphene Oxide.
According to scientists, Graphene Oxide is detected in the immune system as if it were a pathogen. Once injected it has an affinity for the central nervous system, potentially causing paralysis, strokes and alteration of the nervous system.
The scientists also explain that Graphene Oxide has the potential to cause blood clots, which explains why the Covid-19 injections increase the risk of suffering thrombosis with thrombocytopenia.
It is not just scientists from Spain making these claims though. Numerous scientists around the world have now published findings where they allege they have discovered both nanotechnology and Graphene Oxide in the Covid-19 injections.
Scientists discover ‘Carbon Nanotech’ & ‘Radioactive Thulium’ in Pfizer & Moderna COVID Vaccines
After reviewing electron microscope images of elements contained in the Covid Pfizer and Moderna injections, Dr Daniel Nagase, a Canadian emergency room doctor, revealed that, strangely, the contents of the Pfizer and Moderna “vaccines” show no signs of biological material, including mRNA or DNA. (Read more here).
Dr Nagase’s research group looked at these Moderna and Pfizer samples under a regular microscope. Although there were a lot of very interesting images, they were unable to be conclusive about what exactly they were seeing. So, they used an electron microscope to determine what elements the “vaccines” contained.
Here are some of the images of what they found –
Found in a Moderna Covid “vaccine” sample
Dr. Nagase examined a “ball with the legs growing out of it” found inside a Moderna sample. “This shape, this ball with the legs growing out of it, for some reason has aluminium in it. And I can say with certainty that this isn’t a mould spore or some other type of biological contamination, because the only thing in it is carbon, oxygen, and no signs of nitrogen, no signs of phosphorus, which would indicate something biological of origin. So, this thing that’s growing is non-biological.”
Dr. Nagase and the researchers also discovered an unusual element from the lanthanide series – thulium – in a fibre-like structure found in a Pfizer sample –
Found in a Pfizer Covid “vaccine” sample
Dr. Nagase and the researchers found a variety of shapes and structures inside the “vaccine” samples they tested – crystals, chips, strands, bulbs, spheres, fibres and balls with legs growing out of them – “we have polymorphic, which is many different forms,” he said.
“They all seem to be made predominantly out of carbon and oxygen and they were in both the Moderna and Pfizer samples, and they seem to be in fibre forms. In the Moderna sample, the carbon-oxygen structures seem to be taking nanosphere forms and crystalline forms. And in the Pfizer sample … seem to only be forming fibres and crystals.
...[Message truncated]
Staff
From: WALTER784
3/1/23
This Is Big: Naomi Wolf Confirms Big Pharma Was Adding Varying Amounts of Active Ingredient to Batches of COVID Vaccine (VIDEO)
By Jim Hoft
Mar. 14, 2022 12:12 pm
Former Clinton adviser and COVID Vaccine critic Naomi Wolf joined Steve Bannon on The War Room on Monday morning. Naomi shared her latest bombshell from her investigation into the Pfizer vaccine documents released by the US government on their COVID vaccine testing. Naomi’s team of investigators, doctors and attorneys identified several US government documents that confirm that Pfizer was adding varying amounts of active ingredient to their experimental COVID vaccines. According to the data, the range of dangerous active ingredient went from 3μg, to 10μg, to 30μg, to 100μg depending on the batch they happened to inject you with.
As Naomi mentioned, this ties in directly with the website “How Bad Is My Batch” that was created so you could track how many adverse reaction incidents were linked to the vaccine batch you were given.
Now there is proof via AMA documents that they are distributing different doses of the active ingredient in the COVID vaccines based on batch number.
What the hell?
FWIW
Staff
From: WALTER784
3/1/23
Over 60 Scientists & Drs. confirm Covid Vaccines contain ‘Toxic Substances’ that cause strange & dangerous changes to Blood
BY THE EXPOSÉ
FEBRUARY 15, 2023
The German Working Group for Covid Vaccine Analysis has made its ‘Summary of Preliminary Findings’ publicly available. In a wide-ranging report, the Group described the toxic substances found in all Covid “vaccine” samples analysed and the marked changes seen in blood samples taken from vaccinated people. The Group also found that the greater the stability of the envelope of lipid nanoparticles, the more frequent the vaccine side effects.
“In order to avert a direct and imminent danger to human life and public safety, we ask that the Covid-19 vaccination programmes be discontinued immediately,” the Group’s report stated.
According to WG Vaccines Education, this report was sent to all members of the Bundestag (Lower House of Parliament in Germany) and then to authorities and media – a total of over 4000 people.
The Working Group for Covid Vaccine Analysis is an interdisciplinary working group that has undertaken the task of analysing the contents and the effects of the novel Covid-19 “vaccines.” The group is an internationally networked working group with a core team of more than 60 doctors, physicians, pharmacists, scientists, mathematicians, alternative health practitioners, lawyers and journalists.
The Group noted that due to the unprecedented political situation that they have found themselves in since March 2020, the contents of their report have not been subjected to the customary peer-review process. However, “several highly qualified colleagues in our international network have taken a critical look at our presentations and provided feedback.”
This summary is a preliminary, continuously evolving presentation of our research and findings on the so-called Covid-19 vaccines, as well as the effects we found on the human body and the blood in particular. The summary is intended for the public interest and to encourage further scientific discussion.
The Working Group for Covid Vaccine Analysis continues to work in close cooperation with several international groups that are carrying out similar investigations and who have obtained results consistent with our own. The results from our analysis of the vaccines can, consequently, be regarded as cross-validated.
There are questions that need to be satisfactorily answered by the vaccine manufacturers and, in Germany, by the Paul Ehrlich Institute (the agency of the German Federal Ministry of Health responsible for the regulation of vaccines in that country). Possible causal links between the vaccines and fatalities need to be investigated.
Summary of Preliminary Findings, Working Group for Covid Vaccine Analysis, 6 July 2022, pg.3
Blood Samples Examined
The Group examined blood samples from 48 vaccinated people.
The comparison of blood samples from unvaccinated and vaccinated individuals by means of dark-field microscopy showed noticeable changes in the blood of each person who had been vaccinated with the Covid-19 vaccines. This was evident even if those people hadn’t at that point displayed any visible reaction to the vaccinations. Complex structures similar to those in the vaccines were found in the blood samples of the vaccinated. Using artificial intelligence (AI) image analysis, the difference between the blood of vaccinated and unvaccinated people was confirmed.
Summary of Preliminary Findings, Working Group for Covid Vaccine Analysis, 6 July 2022, pg.3
Using a small sample of live blood analyses from both vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals, they determined that artificial intelligence (AI) can distinguish with 100% reliability between the blood of the vaccinated and the unvaccinated. This indicates that the Covid-19 vaccines can effect long-term changes in the composition of the blood of the person vaccinated without that person being aware of these changes.
Crystalline formations were found in all of the blood samples taken from vaccinated people. “We are continuing to analyse these formations,” the authors noted. The Group also observed rouleaux formations of red blood cells in all vaccinated samples and “frequently observed an unusually rapid disintegration of the different types of cells in the vaccinated blood.”
Below are a few of the numerous images included in the report. The image descriptions are self-explanatory.
...[Message truncated]
Staff
From: WALTER784
3/2/23
Why is the US government keeping track of the unvaccinated?
US government has been secretly tracking those who are not covid injected through health records
BY RHODA WILSON
FEBRUARY 16, 2023
The US government has secretly been tracking those who didn’t get the covid injection, or are only partially “vaccinated,” through a previously unknown surveillance program designed by the US National Centre for Health Statistics (“NCHS”), a division of the Centres for Disease Control and Prevention.
The program was implemented on 1 April 2022 and adopted by most medical clinics and hospitals across the US by January 2023.
Under this programme, doctors at clinics and hospitals have been instructed to ask patients about their vaccination status, which is then added to their electronic medical records as a diagnostic code, known as the ICD-10 code, so that they can be tracked inside and outside of the medical system.
These new ICD-10 codes are part of the government’s plan to implement medical tyranny using vaccine passports and digital IDs.
They’re also tracking noncompliance with all other recommended vaccines using new ICD-10 codes, and have implemented codes to describe WHY you didn’t get a recommended vaccine. They’ve also added a billable ICD code for “vaccine safety counselling.”
As ICD codes are widely used by countries that are following the diktats of the World Health Organisation (“WHO”), before we detail what is being implemented in the USA, we divert a little to try to establish if similar tracking of covid “unvaccinated” is happening elsewhere.
Has the ICD-10 changes been implemented in England?
In England, OPCS-4 and ICD-10 are fully implemented and embedded in NHS standards and mandated for use by Health Care Providers. They form part of the National Health Service (“NHS”) Standard Contracts and have been approved as NHS Fundamental Information Standards.
Classification of Interventions and Procedures version 4 (“OPCS-4”) is a statistical classification for clinical coding of hospital interventions and procedures undertaken by the NHS. International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Health Related Problems (“ICD-10”) is a comprehensive classification of causes of morbidity and mortality and is published by WHO. So, OPCS-4 is used to classify interventions and surgical procedures, while ICD-10 is used to classify diseases and other health conditions.
As of 1 February 2023, NHS Digital merged with NHS England to bring together one single organisation, referred to as NHS England. NHS Digital develops, maintains and licenses OPCS-4 on behalf of the Department of Health. NHS Digital, as the UK WHO-Family of International Classifications Collaborating Centre, contributes to the development and maintenance of ICD-10, which is owned by WHO. NHS Digital has been granted a licence by WHO, to make ICD-10 available for use across the NHS.
The NHS is currently using ICD-10 5th Edition which was released on 18 September 2015. The ICD-10 5th Edition does not contain codes for “underimmunised COVID-19 status.”
Source: NHS Digital, Classifications Browser ICD-10 5th Edition, retrieved 15 February 2023
Similarly, a search through the summary changes of the updated OPCS shows that the Z28 code relating to under immunisation or immunisation not carried out has not been amended either in the latest update in November 2022 or the previous update in October 2019. You can see the summary of changes made in November 2022 HERE.
Currently, as it appears on paper at least, the additional ICD-10 codes to record and track those who have chosen not to be injected with a covid “vaccine” are specific to the USA. By 2011, WHO’s ICD was being used by more than 100 countries. However, countries other than the USA do not code further than the 5th character, so no other country gets close to the 69,000 codes used in the USA.
For example “immunisation not carried out” in the image above has a code of three characters – Z28. “Immunisation not carried out because of contraindication” has a code with four characters – Z28.0. As you will see below, in the USA the code for “Unvaccinated for COVID-19” has six characters – Z28.310. At this time it seems the USA is the only country that has codes to the six character level. Whether other countries adopt the coding system being implemented in the USA in the future remains to be se
...[Message truncated]
Staff
From: WALTER784
3/2/23
BOMBSHELL: The FDA’s emergency use authorization (EUA) for covid “vaccines” was FAKED
Wednesday, February 15, 2023
by: Ethan Huff
BOMBSHELL: The FDA’s emergency use authorization (EUA) for covid “vaccines” was FAKED
Wednesday, February 15, 2023 by: Ethan Huff
Tags: badhealth, badmedicine, big government, Big Pharma, Censored Science, corruption, COVID, Dangerous Medicine, deception, EUA, Fake, faked, FDA, pharma fraud, PREP Act, research, science deception, vaccination, vaccine wars, vaccines, whistle-blower
This article may contain statements that reflect the opinion of the author
Image: BOMBSHELL: The FDA’s emergency use authorization (EUA) for covid “vaccines” was FAKED
(Natural News) After Congress passed the Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act (PREP Act) back in 2020, things changed for the worse at the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in terms of the standards used to authorize and approve vaccines, biologics, and other pharmaceutical drugs.
All of the certified Good Clinical Practices (GCP) that were followed prior to 2020 went out the window at the height of the Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) scamdemic to pave the way for warp speed drug approvals on the fly, which is exactly what happened with Operation Warp Speed.
(Related: Check out our earlier coverage about the PREP Act to learn more about this heinous law and what it did to exempt the vaccine industry from legal liability for injuries and deaths caused by covid “vaccines”.)
Whistleblower Brook Jackson brought to light many of the blatant violations of GCP in Pfizer’s human clinical “trials” for its messenger RNA (mRNA) shot, which we now know is both dangerous and ineffective. Ventavia, the Pfizer partner that held the trials, knew full well about the violations at the time of the trials.
After Jackson blew the lid on the whole operation, Ventavia went into attack mode. It vilified the victims of Pfizer’s lethal injections who are now suffering or dead because of getting jabbed, as well as arranged for Jackson to be fired for telling the truth.
The following bullet points highlight the observations that Jackson made while at Ventavia, which she included in her whistleblower complaint:
fabrication and falsification of blood draw information, vital signs, signatures and other essential clinical trial data; enrollment and injection of ineligible clinical trial participants, including Ventavia employees’ family members;
failure to timely remove ineligible patients’ data from the trial; failure to maintain temperature control for the vaccine at issue; failure to monitor patients after injection as required by the trial protocol; principal investigator oversight failures;
use of unqualified and untrained personnel as vaccinators and laboratory personnel; failure to maintain the “blind” as required, which is essential to the credibility and validity of the observer-blinded clinical trial;
ethical violations, such as failure to secure informed consent and giving patients unapproved compensation;
improper injection of the vaccine (i.e., by over-diluting vaccine concentrate or using the wrong needle size);
failure to ensure that trial site staff were properly trained as required by good clinical practices;
safety and confidentiality issues, including HIPAA violations; and other violations of the clinical trial protocol, FDA regulations, and Federal Acquisition Regulations and their DoD supplements.
Pfizer and the DoD committed FRAUD by submitting sham trials to fake FDA reviewers
Had the old, pre-PREP Act rules still been valid at the times of these fraudulent trials, none of the aforementioned issues would have been tolerated. In fact, the entire clinical trial operation would have been halted immediately.
Brighteon.TV
Instead, the trials proceeded as normal, despite all the corruption, and were used to later justify mandating covid injections on millions of Americans who otherwise would have just said no to these deadly drugs, as the late First Lady Nancy Reagan once urged.
During the emergency use authorization (EUA) farce, Pfizer, in conjunction with the Department of De
...[Message truncated]
TOP